Repost: 1997 Tib. 1.8 & 2.0 Exhaust differences
11-05-2003 | 05:47 PM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Repost: 1997 Tib. 1.8 & 2.0 Exhaust differences
I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car is what
was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an exhaust
manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this purchase
because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin wall
tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an uncommon
problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my new
(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold, unlike the
thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much shorter
( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8 and 2.0
engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast into
it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly connect the
cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?
Thanks in advance for any help you provide.
Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car is what
was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an exhaust
manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this purchase
because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin wall
tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an uncommon
problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my new
(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold, unlike the
thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much shorter
( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8 and 2.0
engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast into
it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly connect the
cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?
Thanks in advance for any help you provide.
11-06-2003 | 08:21 AM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Repost: 1997 Tib. 1.8 & 2.0 Exhaust differences
In article <56fqb.12210$Mc.1019@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron" <tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
>I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
>Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car is what
>was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an exhaust
>manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this purchase
>because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin wall
>tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an uncommon
>problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my new
>(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold, unlike the
>thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much shorter
>( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
> Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8 and 2.0
>engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
>differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast into
>it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
> Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly connect the
>cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
>differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?
How many miles on it?
>I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
>Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car is what
>was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an exhaust
>manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this purchase
>because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin wall
>tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an uncommon
>problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my new
>(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold, unlike the
>thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much shorter
>( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
> Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8 and 2.0
>engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
>differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast into
>it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
> Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly connect the
>cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
>differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?
How many miles on it?
11-06-2003 | 01:14 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Repost: 1997 Tib. 1.8 & 2.0 Exhaust differences
It has over 221k miles and still running strong.
<theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bodhsu$2ko_006@west.earthlink.net...
> In article <56fqb.12210$Mc.1019@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"
<tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
> >I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
> >Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car is
what
> >was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an exhaust
> >manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this purchase
> >because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin
wall
> >tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an
uncommon
> >problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my new
> >(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold, unlike
the
> >thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much
shorter
> >( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
> > Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8 and
2.0
> >engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
> >differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast
into
> >it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
> > Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly connect
the
> >cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
> >differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?
>
> How many miles on it?
<theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bodhsu$2ko_006@west.earthlink.net...
> In article <56fqb.12210$Mc.1019@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"
<tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
> >I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
> >Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car is
what
> >was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an exhaust
> >manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this purchase
> >because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin
wall
> >tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an
uncommon
> >problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my new
> >(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold, unlike
the
> >thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much
shorter
> >( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
> > Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8 and
2.0
> >engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
> >differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast
into
> >it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
> > Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly connect
the
> >cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
> >differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?
>
> How many miles on it?
11-06-2003 | 02:06 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Repost: 1997 Tib. 1.8 & 2.0 Exhaust differences
In article <wcwqb.14447$Mc.4462@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron" <tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
>It has over 221k miles and still running strong.
OK, the manifold you got is for the what they call CCC(close couple
converter)-type exhaust of the Beta engine, so to answer your question, yes,
there are other differences besides the flex pipe and manifold.
><theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:bodhsu$2ko_006@west.earthlink.net...
>> In article <56fqb.12210$Mc.1019@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"
><tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
>> >I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
>> >Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car is
>what
>> >was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an exhaust
>> >manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this purchase
>> >because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin
>wall
>> >tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an
>uncommon
>> >problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my new
>> >(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold, unlike
>the
>> >thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much
>shorter
>> >( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
>> > Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8 and
>2.0
>> >engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
>> >differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast
>into
>> >it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
>> > Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly connect
>the
>> >cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
>> >differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?
>>
>> How many miles on it?
>
>
>It has over 221k miles and still running strong.
OK, the manifold you got is for the what they call CCC(close couple
converter)-type exhaust of the Beta engine, so to answer your question, yes,
there are other differences besides the flex pipe and manifold.
><theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:bodhsu$2ko_006@west.earthlink.net...
>> In article <56fqb.12210$Mc.1019@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"
><tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
>> >I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
>> >Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car is
>what
>> >was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an exhaust
>> >manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this purchase
>> >because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin
>wall
>> >tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an
>uncommon
>> >problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my new
>> >(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold, unlike
>the
>> >thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much
>shorter
>> >( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
>> > Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8 and
>2.0
>> >engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
>> >differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast
>into
>> >it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
>> > Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly connect
>the
>> >cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
>> >differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?
>>
>> How many miles on it?
>
>
11-06-2003 | 04:07 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Repost: 1997 Tib. 1.8 & 2.0 Exhaust differences
Thanks for the info. So what you're basically saying is I would need to
replace my complete exhaust system to use the new manifold, right?
<theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:boe634$398_002@west.earthlink.net...
> In article <wcwqb.14447$Mc.4462@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"
<tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
> >It has over 221k miles and still running strong.
>
> OK, the manifold you got is for the what they call CCC(close couple
> converter)-type exhaust of the Beta engine, so to answer your question,
yes,
> there are other differences besides the flex pipe and manifold.
>
> ><theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:bodhsu$2ko_006@west.earthlink.net...
> >> In article <56fqb.12210$Mc.1019@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"
> ><tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
> >> >I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
> >> >Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car
is
> >what
> >> >was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an
exhaust
> >> >manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this
purchase
> >> >because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin
> >wall
> >> >tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an
> >uncommon
> >> >problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my
new
> >> >(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold,
unlike
> >the
> >> >thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much
> >shorter
> >> >( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
> >> > Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8
and
> >2.0
> >> >engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
> >> >differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast
> >into
> >> >it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
> >> > Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly
connect
> >the
> >> >cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
> >> >differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?
> >>
> >> How many miles on it?
> >
> >
replace my complete exhaust system to use the new manifold, right?
<theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:boe634$398_002@west.earthlink.net...
> In article <wcwqb.14447$Mc.4462@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"
<tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
> >It has over 221k miles and still running strong.
>
> OK, the manifold you got is for the what they call CCC(close couple
> converter)-type exhaust of the Beta engine, so to answer your question,
yes,
> there are other differences besides the flex pipe and manifold.
>
> ><theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:bodhsu$2ko_006@west.earthlink.net...
> >> In article <56fqb.12210$Mc.1019@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"
> ><tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
> >> >I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
> >> >Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car
is
> >what
> >> >was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an
exhaust
> >> >manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this
purchase
> >> >because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin
> >wall
> >> >tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an
> >uncommon
> >> >problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my
new
> >> >(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold,
unlike
> >the
> >> >thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much
> >shorter
> >> >( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
> >> > Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8
and
> >2.0
> >> >engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
> >> >differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast
> >into
> >> >it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
> >> > Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly
connect
> >the
> >> >cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
> >> >differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?
> >>
> >> How many miles on it?
> >
> >
11-06-2003 | 09:49 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Repost: 1997 Tib. 1.8 & 2.0 Exhaust differences
In article <%Jyqb.15443$Mc.9618@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron" <tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
>Thanks for the info. So what you're basically saying is I would need to
>replace my complete exhaust system to use the new manifold, right?
Yes
><theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:boe634$398_002@west.earthlink.net...
>> In article <wcwqb.14447$Mc.4462@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"
><tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
>> >It has over 221k miles and still running strong.
>>
>> OK, the manifold you got is for the what they call CCC(close couple
>> converter)-type exhaust of the Beta engine, so to answer your question,
>yes,
>> there are other differences besides the flex pipe and manifold.
>>
>> ><theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >news:bodhsu$2ko_006@west.earthlink.net...
>> >> In article <56fqb.12210$Mc.1019@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"
>> ><tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
>> >> >I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
>> >> >Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car
>is
>> >what
>> >> >was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an
>exhaust
>> >> >manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this
>purchase
>> >> >because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin
>> >wall
>> >> >tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an
>> >uncommon
>> >> >problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my
>new
>> >> >(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold,
>unlike
>> >the
>> >> >thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much
>> >shorter
>> >> >( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
>> >> > Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8
>and
>> >2.0
>> >> >engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
>> >> >differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast
>> >into
>> >> >it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
>> >> > Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly
>connect
>> >the
>> >> >cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
>> >> >differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?
>> >>
>> >> How many miles on it?
>> >
>> >
>
>
>Thanks for the info. So what you're basically saying is I would need to
>replace my complete exhaust system to use the new manifold, right?
Yes
><theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:boe634$398_002@west.earthlink.net...
>> In article <wcwqb.14447$Mc.4462@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"
><tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
>> >It has over 221k miles and still running strong.
>>
>> OK, the manifold you got is for the what they call CCC(close couple
>> converter)-type exhaust of the Beta engine, so to answer your question,
>yes,
>> there are other differences besides the flex pipe and manifold.
>>
>> ><theta00k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >news:bodhsu$2ko_006@west.earthlink.net...
>> >> In article <56fqb.12210$Mc.1019@twister.austin.rr.com>, "Dan Caron"
>> ><tcg@hot.rr.com> wrote:
>> >> >I've got a question for the Tiburon experts out here. I bought a 1997
>> >> >Tiburon with 1.8 liter engine new, so I know that what is on the car
>is
>> >what
>> >> >was put in by the factory. I recently purchased, through Ebay, an
>exhaust
>> >> >manifold from a 1997 Tiburon FX (2.0 liter engine). I made this
>purchase
>> >> >because the original manifold on my car, which is constructed of thin
>> >wall
>> >> >tubing, had developed a lot of cracks ( I understand this is not an
>> >uncommon
>> >> >problem) and I was seeking an economical replacement. On receiving my
>new
>> >> >(read used) manifold, I found that it was a heavy, cast manifold,
>unlike
>> >the
>> >> >thin-walled manifold in my car. Also, the vertical length was much
>> >shorter
>> >> >( from engine flange to exhaust flange).
>> >> > Okay, now to the question(s). I had always believed that the 1.8
>and
>> >2.0
>> >> >engines were basically the same with bore and stroke being the primary
>> >> >differences. I know the head on my car has a 1.8/2.0 designation cast
>> >into
>> >> >it. Are the blocks, in fact, different?
>> >> > Can I purchase a flex pipe from Hyundai that would properly
>connect
>> >the
>> >> >cast iron manifold to my stock exhaust system, or were there other
>> >> >differences in the FX exhaust system that would preclude this?
>> >>
>> >> How many miles on it?
>> >
>> >
>
>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Eugene Galchenko
Honda Mailing List
0
01-06-2004 12:19 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)