Transmission Warranty
11-16-2006 | 01:35 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Transmission Warranty
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
news:elmop-D0CE76.13050516112006@nntp4.usenetserver.com...
> In article <hP%6h.8$LN6.6@newsfe11.lga>, "Matthew" <thew60@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> > The transmission on my 1998 Accord failed after a mere 70k miles. Honda
> > insisted mine was NOT covered by the extended warranty (knowing damn
well it
> > should have been!!)
>
> Why should it have been?
>
> Was it a 4 speed auto trans hooked to a V6 engine?
>
The new suit only applies to 2000 and newer
MLD
11-16-2006 | 03:46 PM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Transmission Warranty
Yes, the 98-02 EXV6 was a 4 AT hooked to a V6. How Honda could have left the
98 and 99's off the "recall" is absurd. The 98 was the FIRST model year of
that run and was prone to the same tranny probs as the 2000 and later.
"MLD" <MLD@verizon.net> wrote in message news
b27h.3997$xD.344@trndny08...
>
> "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
> news:elmop-D0CE76.13050516112006@nntp4.usenetserver.com...
> > In article <hP%6h.8$LN6.6@newsfe11.lga>, "Matthew" <thew60@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The transmission on my 1998 Accord failed after a mere 70k miles.
Honda
> > > insisted mine was NOT covered by the extended warranty (knowing damn
> well it
> > > should have been!!)
> >
> > Why should it have been?
> >
> > Was it a 4 speed auto trans hooked to a V6 engine?
> >
> The new suit only applies to 2000 and newer
> MLD
>
>
98 and 99's off the "recall" is absurd. The 98 was the FIRST model year of
that run and was prone to the same tranny probs as the 2000 and later.
"MLD" <MLD@verizon.net> wrote in message news
b27h.3997$xD.344@trndny08...>
> "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
> news:elmop-D0CE76.13050516112006@nntp4.usenetserver.com...
> > In article <hP%6h.8$LN6.6@newsfe11.lga>, "Matthew" <thew60@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The transmission on my 1998 Accord failed after a mere 70k miles.
Honda
> > > insisted mine was NOT covered by the extended warranty (knowing damn
> well it
> > > should have been!!)
> >
> > Why should it have been?
> >
> > Was it a 4 speed auto trans hooked to a V6 engine?
> >
> The new suit only applies to 2000 and newer
> MLD
>
>
11-16-2006 | 03:46 PM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Transmission Warranty
Yes, the 98-02 EXV6 was a 4 AT hooked to a V6. How Honda could have left the
98 and 99's off the "recall" is absurd. The 98 was the FIRST model year of
that run and was prone to the same tranny probs as the 2000 and later.
"MLD" <MLD@verizon.net> wrote in message newsb27h.3997$xD.344@trndny08...
>
> "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
> news:elmop-D0CE76.13050516112006@nntp4.usenetserver.com...
> > In article <hP%6h.8$LN6.6@newsfe11.lga>, "Matthew" <thew60@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The transmission on my 1998 Accord failed after a mere 70k miles.
Honda
> > > insisted mine was NOT covered by the extended warranty (knowing damn
> well it
> > > should have been!!)
> >
> > Why should it have been?
> >
> > Was it a 4 speed auto trans hooked to a V6 engine?
> >
> The new suit only applies to 2000 and newer
> MLD
>
>
98 and 99's off the "recall" is absurd. The 98 was the FIRST model year of
that run and was prone to the same tranny probs as the 2000 and later.
"MLD" <MLD@verizon.net> wrote in message news
b27h.3997$xD.344@trndny08...>
> "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
> news:elmop-D0CE76.13050516112006@nntp4.usenetserver.com...
> > In article <hP%6h.8$LN6.6@newsfe11.lga>, "Matthew" <thew60@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The transmission on my 1998 Accord failed after a mere 70k miles.
Honda
> > > insisted mine was NOT covered by the extended warranty (knowing damn
> well it
> > > should have been!!)
> >
> > Why should it have been?
> >
> > Was it a 4 speed auto trans hooked to a V6 engine?
> >
> The new suit only applies to 2000 and newer
> MLD
>
>
11-16-2006 | 03:46 PM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Transmission Warranty
Yes, the 98-02 EXV6 was a 4 AT hooked to a V6. How Honda could have left the
98 and 99's off the "recall" is absurd. The 98 was the FIRST model year of
that run and was prone to the same tranny probs as the 2000 and later.
"MLD" <MLD@verizon.net> wrote in message newsb27h.3997$xD.344@trndny08...
>
> "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
> news:elmop-D0CE76.13050516112006@nntp4.usenetserver.com...
> > In article <hP%6h.8$LN6.6@newsfe11.lga>, "Matthew" <thew60@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The transmission on my 1998 Accord failed after a mere 70k miles.
Honda
> > > insisted mine was NOT covered by the extended warranty (knowing damn
> well it
> > > should have been!!)
> >
> > Why should it have been?
> >
> > Was it a 4 speed auto trans hooked to a V6 engine?
> >
> The new suit only applies to 2000 and newer
> MLD
>
>
98 and 99's off the "recall" is absurd. The 98 was the FIRST model year of
that run and was prone to the same tranny probs as the 2000 and later.
"MLD" <MLD@verizon.net> wrote in message news
b27h.3997$xD.344@trndny08...>
> "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
> news:elmop-D0CE76.13050516112006@nntp4.usenetserver.com...
> > In article <hP%6h.8$LN6.6@newsfe11.lga>, "Matthew" <thew60@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The transmission on my 1998 Accord failed after a mere 70k miles.
Honda
> > > insisted mine was NOT covered by the extended warranty (knowing damn
> well it
> > > should have been!!)
> >
> > Why should it have been?
> >
> > Was it a 4 speed auto trans hooked to a V6 engine?
> >
> The new suit only applies to 2000 and newer
> MLD
>
>
11-16-2006 | 11:12 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
11-16-2006 | 11:12 PM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
11-16-2006 | 11:12 PM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
11-18-2006 | 11:11 AM
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Transmission Warranty
Thanks for the link. Mine was not covered (1998), however it shows that
Honda acted in good faith by working with me in replacing the tranny in my
98.
"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:kEa7h.4211$m72.2512@trnddc03...
> You can look up details at:
>
> http://www.hondatransmissionsettlement.com/
Honda acted in good faith by working with me in replacing the tranny in my
98.
"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:kEa7h.4211$m72.2512@trnddc03...
> You can look up details at:
>
> http://www.hondatransmissionsettlement.com/
11-18-2006 | 11:11 AM
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Transmission Warranty
Thanks for the link. Mine was not covered (1998), however it shows that
Honda acted in good faith by working with me in replacing the tranny in my
98.
"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:kEa7h.4211$m72.2512@trnddc03...
> You can look up details at:
>
> http://www.hondatransmissionsettlement.com/
Honda acted in good faith by working with me in replacing the tranny in my
98.
"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:kEa7h.4211$m72.2512@trnddc03...
> You can look up details at:
>
> http://www.hondatransmissionsettlement.com/
11-18-2006 | 11:11 AM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Transmission Warranty
Thanks for the link. Mine was not covered (1998), however it shows that
Honda acted in good faith by working with me in replacing the tranny in my
98.
"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:kEa7h.4211$m72.2512@trnddc03...
> You can look up details at:
>
> http://www.hondatransmissionsettlement.com/
Honda acted in good faith by working with me in replacing the tranny in my
98.
"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:kEa7h.4211$m72.2512@trnddc03...
> You can look up details at:
>
> http://www.hondatransmissionsettlement.com/
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SusanR
Honda Mailing List
3
07-03-2003 10:57 PM
Timothy J. Lee
Honda Mailing List
0
07-03-2003 06:57 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)