Dave L wrote:

> My concern is the dealership downgraded the factory recommended tires for
> your car. It's riding on a harder rubber so you'll probably get a few more
> miles out of it but you're sacrificing the handling and performance
> characteristics of the car. As someone else mentioned it affects safety as
> well.
>
> True the speed rating determines how fast you can safely drive with those
> tires but it will also affect the heat index and often wet weather traction
> (the traction rating on the tires). Most people will never drive as fast as
> the speed rating on the V and Z rated tires but they still make them for
> performance reasons since it will affect slower speeds as well. The tires
> will still work and you can drive safely on them. It's just a trade off.

Also good points. My plan was to ride out the Insignia's for the next month
or so before I put my winter tires on. The winter tires I used on my '93
Accord last winter will fit on my Civic, although I have to change the rims
due to different bolt setups between the two cars. Come next spring, I will
likely look for good H-rated all-season tires to replace the Insignia's.

For the record, I am not an aggressive, performance-minded driver, even
though I do tend to go about 5-10mph above the speed limit. :-)

 

"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:1xm1xypirq2uh.dlg@hightech.misfit...
> Dave L wrote:
>
>> My concern is the dealership downgraded the factory recommended tires for
>> your car. It's riding on a harder rubber so you'll probably get a few
>> more
>> miles out of it but you're sacrificing the handling and performance
>> characteristics of the car. As someone else mentioned it affects safety
>> as
>> well.
>>
>> True the speed rating determines how fast you can safely drive with those
>> tires but it will also affect the heat index and often wet weather
>> traction
>> (the traction rating on the tires). Most people will never drive as fast
>> as
>> the speed rating on the V and Z rated tires but they still make them for
>> performance reasons since it will affect slower speeds as well. The
>> tires
>> will still work and you can drive safely on them. It's just a trade off.
>
> Also good points. My plan was to ride out the Insignia's for the next
> month
> or so before I put my winter tires on. The winter tires I used on my '93
> Accord last winter will fit on my Civic, although I have to change the
> rims
> due to different bolt setups between the two cars. Come next spring, I
> will
> likely look for good H-rated all-season tires to replace the Insignia's.

Sounds like a plan.

> For the record, I am not an aggressive, performance-minded driver, even
> though I do tend to go about 5-10mph above the speed limit. :-)

You'll be fine. If you were an aggressive driver and had the car with
H-rated tires and decided to switch to S-rated, there's something to worry
about! If you're happy with the car and not an aggressive driver I wouldn't
worry. When you switch to H-rated I'm sure you'll notice a difference.

 

"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:1xm1xypirq2uh.dlg@hightech.misfit...
> Dave L wrote:
>
>> My concern is the dealership downgraded the factory recommended tires for
>> your car. It's riding on a harder rubber so you'll probably get a few
>> more
>> miles out of it but you're sacrificing the handling and performance
>> characteristics of the car. As someone else mentioned it affects safety
>> as
>> well.
>>
>> True the speed rating determines how fast you can safely drive with those
>> tires but it will also affect the heat index and often wet weather
>> traction
>> (the traction rating on the tires). Most people will never drive as fast
>> as
>> the speed rating on the V and Z rated tires but they still make them for
>> performance reasons since it will affect slower speeds as well. The
>> tires
>> will still work and you can drive safely on them. It's just a trade off.
>
> Also good points. My plan was to ride out the Insignia's for the next
> month
> or so before I put my winter tires on. The winter tires I used on my '93
> Accord last winter will fit on my Civic, although I have to change the
> rims
> due to different bolt setups between the two cars. Come next spring, I
> will
> likely look for good H-rated all-season tires to replace the Insignia's.

Sounds like a plan.

> For the record, I am not an aggressive, performance-minded driver, even
> though I do tend to go about 5-10mph above the speed limit. :-)

You'll be fine. If you were an aggressive driver and had the car with
H-rated tires and decided to switch to S-rated, there's something to worry
about! If you're happy with the car and not an aggressive driver I wouldn't
worry. When you switch to H-rated I'm sure you'll notice a difference.

 

"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:1xm1xypirq2uh.dlg@hightech.misfit...
> Dave L wrote:
>
>> My concern is the dealership downgraded the factory recommended tires for
>> your car. It's riding on a harder rubber so you'll probably get a few
>> more
>> miles out of it but you're sacrificing the handling and performance
>> characteristics of the car. As someone else mentioned it affects safety
>> as
>> well.
>>
>> True the speed rating determines how fast you can safely drive with those
>> tires but it will also affect the heat index and often wet weather
>> traction
>> (the traction rating on the tires). Most people will never drive as fast
>> as
>> the speed rating on the V and Z rated tires but they still make them for
>> performance reasons since it will affect slower speeds as well. The
>> tires
>> will still work and you can drive safely on them. It's just a trade off.
>
> Also good points. My plan was to ride out the Insignia's for the next
> month
> or so before I put my winter tires on. The winter tires I used on my '93
> Accord last winter will fit on my Civic, although I have to change the
> rims
> due to different bolt setups between the two cars. Come next spring, I
> will
> likely look for good H-rated all-season tires to replace the Insignia's.

Sounds like a plan.

> For the record, I am not an aggressive, performance-minded driver, even
> though I do tend to go about 5-10mph above the speed limit. :-)

You'll be fine. If you were an aggressive driver and had the car with
H-rated tires and decided to switch to S-rated, there's something to worry
about! If you're happy with the car and not an aggressive driver I wouldn't
worry. When you switch to H-rated I'm sure you'll notice a difference.

 

"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:fnsudr0fzh3v$.dlg@hightech.misfit...
> Apologies for the double post - I was lurking in a KISS newsgroup for some
> strange reason and inadvertently x-posted to it instead of
> rec.autos.makers.honda. :-/
>
> Again...
>
> I've had my 2004 Civic LX for a few days now and I really like it. I do
> have one concern, however. The dealer replaced the original Firestone
tires
> with Bridgestone Insignia's, which I know are low end OEM-type tires. My
> concern is that these tires are S-rated, but my manual says that H-rated
> tires are recommended for the LX model (S is acceptable for the base DX).
>
> I know that the maximum speed capability for an S-rated tire is 180km/h
> (112mph). Because I never approach anywhere near that speed, I figure the
> S-rated tires should be OK on my LX, notwithstanding that they probably
> won't last long with all the driving I have been doing as of late. But
what
> I would like to know is if I could use a Q-rated winter tire on the car
> during the winter months, or if this is too big of a drop from the
> recommended H.
>
> Thanks in advance.

Don't know where you are located, but the Civic LX in the US (my son has
one) came with a low end Firestone S rated tire. A H rated tire was tested
and rated for a max of 130 as I recall and is stiffer which would give you
better handling. Some cars such as the Prelude you would not want to run
anything below a V rating given the suspension and capability of the car
which most owners would use. I have tended to go with higher ratings than
stock simply because of the better handling involved. But, then the Civic
LX in the US though the 03 model did not require anything more than an S
rating.

 

"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:fnsudr0fzh3v$.dlg@hightech.misfit...
> Apologies for the double post - I was lurking in a KISS newsgroup for some
> strange reason and inadvertently x-posted to it instead of
> rec.autos.makers.honda. :-/
>
> Again...
>
> I've had my 2004 Civic LX for a few days now and I really like it. I do
> have one concern, however. The dealer replaced the original Firestone
tires
> with Bridgestone Insignia's, which I know are low end OEM-type tires. My
> concern is that these tires are S-rated, but my manual says that H-rated
> tires are recommended for the LX model (S is acceptable for the base DX).
>
> I know that the maximum speed capability for an S-rated tire is 180km/h
> (112mph). Because I never approach anywhere near that speed, I figure the
> S-rated tires should be OK on my LX, notwithstanding that they probably
> won't last long with all the driving I have been doing as of late. But
what
> I would like to know is if I could use a Q-rated winter tire on the car
> during the winter months, or if this is too big of a drop from the
> recommended H.
>
> Thanks in advance.

Don't know where you are located, but the Civic LX in the US (my son has
one) came with a low end Firestone S rated tire. A H rated tire was tested
and rated for a max of 130 as I recall and is stiffer which would give you
better handling. Some cars such as the Prelude you would not want to run
anything below a V rating given the suspension and capability of the car
which most owners would use. I have tended to go with higher ratings than
stock simply because of the better handling involved. But, then the Civic
LX in the US though the 03 model did not require anything more than an S
rating.

 

"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:fnsudr0fzh3v$.dlg@hightech.misfit...
> Apologies for the double post - I was lurking in a KISS newsgroup for some
> strange reason and inadvertently x-posted to it instead of
> rec.autos.makers.honda. :-/
>
> Again...
>
> I've had my 2004 Civic LX for a few days now and I really like it. I do
> have one concern, however. The dealer replaced the original Firestone
tires
> with Bridgestone Insignia's, which I know are low end OEM-type tires. My
> concern is that these tires are S-rated, but my manual says that H-rated
> tires are recommended for the LX model (S is acceptable for the base DX).
>
> I know that the maximum speed capability for an S-rated tire is 180km/h
> (112mph). Because I never approach anywhere near that speed, I figure the
> S-rated tires should be OK on my LX, notwithstanding that they probably
> won't last long with all the driving I have been doing as of late. But
what
> I would like to know is if I could use a Q-rated winter tire on the car
> during the winter months, or if this is too big of a drop from the
> recommended H.
>
> Thanks in advance.

Don't know where you are located, but the Civic LX in the US (my son has
one) came with a low end Firestone S rated tire. A H rated tire was tested
and rated for a max of 130 as I recall and is stiffer which would give you
better handling. Some cars such as the Prelude you would not want to run
anything below a V rating given the suspension and capability of the car
which most owners would use. I have tended to go with higher ratings than
stock simply because of the better handling involved. But, then the Civic
LX in the US though the 03 model did not require anything more than an S
rating.

 

tww wrote:

> Don't know where you are located, but the Civic LX in the US (my son has
> one) came with a low end Firestone S rated tire. A H rated tire was tested
> and rated for a max of 130 as I recall and is stiffer which would give you
> better handling. Some cars such as the Prelude you would not want to run
> anything below a V rating given the suspension and capability of the car
> which most owners would use. I have tended to go with higher ratings than
> stock simply because of the better handling involved. But, then the Civic
> LX in the US though the 03 model did not require anything more than an S
> rating.

I am in Canada, but the manual that came with my car covers both Canadian
and U.S. versions of the '04 Civic. For Civics in both countries, the
manual specifies S for the DX only and H for other trim levels.

When I test-drove my Civic before buying it, it had the Firestones and they
looked quite worn. I didn't get around to checking the model and speed
rating of those tires.

 

tww wrote:

> Don't know where you are located, but the Civic LX in the US (my son has
> one) came with a low end Firestone S rated tire. A H rated tire was tested
> and rated for a max of 130 as I recall and is stiffer which would give you
> better handling. Some cars such as the Prelude you would not want to run
> anything below a V rating given the suspension and capability of the car
> which most owners would use. I have tended to go with higher ratings than
> stock simply because of the better handling involved. But, then the Civic
> LX in the US though the 03 model did not require anything more than an S
> rating.

I am in Canada, but the manual that came with my car covers both Canadian
and U.S. versions of the '04 Civic. For Civics in both countries, the
manual specifies S for the DX only and H for other trim levels.

When I test-drove my Civic before buying it, it had the Firestones and they
looked quite worn. I didn't get around to checking the model and speed
rating of those tires.

 

tww wrote:

> Don't know where you are located, but the Civic LX in the US (my son has
> one) came with a low end Firestone S rated tire. A H rated tire was tested
> and rated for a max of 130 as I recall and is stiffer which would give you
> better handling. Some cars such as the Prelude you would not want to run
> anything below a V rating given the suspension and capability of the car
> which most owners would use. I have tended to go with higher ratings than
> stock simply because of the better handling involved. But, then the Civic
> LX in the US though the 03 model did not require anything more than an S
> rating.

I am in Canada, but the manual that came with my car covers both Canadian
and U.S. versions of the '04 Civic. For Civics in both countries, the
manual specifies S for the DX only and H for other trim levels.

When I test-drove my Civic before buying it, it had the Firestones and they
looked quite worn. I didn't get around to checking the model and speed
rating of those tires.

 

High Tech Misfit wrote:
> Apologies for the double post - I was lurking in a KISS newsgroup for some
> strange reason and inadvertently x-posted to it instead of
> rec.autos.makers.honda. :-/
>
> Again...
>
> I've had my 2004 Civic LX for a few days now and I really like it. I do
> have one concern, however. The dealer replaced the original Firestone tires
> with Bridgestone Insignia's, which I know are low end OEM-type tires.

If you are happy with the ride, handling and braking then don't worry
about it. For cars driving within the US speed limits and with properly
inflated tires and S or Q rating is fine.

John

 

High Tech Misfit wrote:
> Apologies for the double post - I was lurking in a KISS newsgroup for some
> strange reason and inadvertently x-posted to it instead of
> rec.autos.makers.honda. :-/
>
> Again...
>
> I've had my 2004 Civic LX for a few days now and I really like it. I do
> have one concern, however. The dealer replaced the original Firestone tires
> with Bridgestone Insignia's, which I know are low end OEM-type tires.

If you are happy with the ride, handling and braking then don't worry
about it. For cars driving within the US speed limits and with properly
inflated tires and S or Q rating is fine.

John

 

High Tech Misfit wrote:
> Apologies for the double post - I was lurking in a KISS newsgroup for some
> strange reason and inadvertently x-posted to it instead of
> rec.autos.makers.honda. :-/
>
> Again...
>
> I've had my 2004 Civic LX for a few days now and I really like it. I do
> have one concern, however. The dealer replaced the original Firestone tires
> with Bridgestone Insignia's, which I know are low end OEM-type tires.

If you are happy with the ride, handling and braking then don't worry
about it. For cars driving within the US speed limits and with properly
inflated tires and S or Q rating is fine.

John

 

High Tech Misfit wrote:
> Come next spring, I will
> likely look for good H-rated all-season tires to replace the Insignia's.
>
> For the record, I am not an aggressive, performance-minded driver, even
> though I do tend to go about 5-10mph above the speed limit. :-)

Given that there is no reason to throw away the Insignias. Use 'em up!

I would get a set of steel rims for the snow tires and leave the
Insignias on the rims they are already on and just swap 'em back on in
the spring.


John

 

High Tech Misfit wrote:
> Come next spring, I will
> likely look for good H-rated all-season tires to replace the Insignia's.
>
> For the record, I am not an aggressive, performance-minded driver, even
> though I do tend to go about 5-10mph above the speed limit. :-)

Given that there is no reason to throw away the Insignias. Use 'em up!

I would get a set of steel rims for the snow tires and leave the
Insignias on the rims they are already on and just swap 'em back on in
the spring.


John