Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
11-01-2007 | 10:15 PM
#136
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
> > A) Being the victim of a crime does not mean that you
> > perpetrated that crime. being mugged does not make you a mugger.
> Thanks for clearing that up.
>
> > However, if you have not been mugged and suspect everyone of wanting
> > to mug you, then the odds are, you are a mugger.
> More likely, they are off your meds.
That's another option.
> > B) righties do not accuse lefties of being "lazy moochers who
> > want to suckle the of the working class", they accuse them of
> > being exploitive of the blind stupidity of the common man and of
> > promising things they cannot deliver.
> I don't know where *you* stand (presumably far above the 'stupid common
> man') but you certainly are not a connoisseur of sarcasm.
In MANY respects, I am *exactly* the 'stupid common man' As are
you and everyone else. I know a few things that not everyone does, a
few things that very few do, and I can analyze alternatives when
presented to me, and sometimes detect bullshit. however, the number
of things I do know divided by the number of things I do not know is
zero, just like everyone else. I am generally capable of recognizing
sarcasm, however, you must remember, this is usenet, where absolute
stupidity is presented as serious analysis.
> > Ever looked at the promises of a vendor?
> Huh?
"righties" tend to be businessmen, or to put it another way,
"vendors". They make claims about what their company can do that are
as absurd as the claims the lefties make about what their company (the
US government) can do. Remember, when you hear a "rightie" politician
speak, you are hearing a *loser* of a rightie.
> > YES, righties are guilty of promising undeliverables, just not in
> > the same place as lefties. So, when they make that accusation,
> > believe them.
> Huh? I may need some examples in order to grasp your wisdom.
just read any product brochure and you will see an example of
lies perpetrated by "righties".
> > perpetrated that crime. being mugged does not make you a mugger.
> Thanks for clearing that up.
>
> > However, if you have not been mugged and suspect everyone of wanting
> > to mug you, then the odds are, you are a mugger.
> More likely, they are off your meds.
That's another option.
> > B) righties do not accuse lefties of being "lazy moochers who
> > want to suckle the of the working class", they accuse them of
> > being exploitive of the blind stupidity of the common man and of
> > promising things they cannot deliver.
> I don't know where *you* stand (presumably far above the 'stupid common
> man') but you certainly are not a connoisseur of sarcasm.
In MANY respects, I am *exactly* the 'stupid common man' As are
you and everyone else. I know a few things that not everyone does, a
few things that very few do, and I can analyze alternatives when
presented to me, and sometimes detect bullshit. however, the number
of things I do know divided by the number of things I do not know is
zero, just like everyone else. I am generally capable of recognizing
sarcasm, however, you must remember, this is usenet, where absolute
stupidity is presented as serious analysis.
> > Ever looked at the promises of a vendor?
> Huh?
"righties" tend to be businessmen, or to put it another way,
"vendors". They make claims about what their company can do that are
as absurd as the claims the lefties make about what their company (the
US government) can do. Remember, when you hear a "rightie" politician
speak, you are hearing a *loser* of a rightie.
> > YES, righties are guilty of promising undeliverables, just not in
> > the same place as lefties. So, when they make that accusation,
> > believe them.
> Huh? I may need some examples in order to grasp your wisdom.
just read any product brochure and you will see an example of
lies perpetrated by "righties".
11-01-2007 | 10:15 PM
#137
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
> > A) Being the victim of a crime does not mean that you
> > perpetrated that crime. being mugged does not make you a mugger.
> Thanks for clearing that up.
>
> > However, if you have not been mugged and suspect everyone of wanting
> > to mug you, then the odds are, you are a mugger.
> More likely, they are off your meds.
That's another option.
> > B) righties do not accuse lefties of being "lazy moochers who
> > want to suckle the of the working class", they accuse them of
> > being exploitive of the blind stupidity of the common man and of
> > promising things they cannot deliver.
> I don't know where *you* stand (presumably far above the 'stupid common
> man') but you certainly are not a connoisseur of sarcasm.
In MANY respects, I am *exactly* the 'stupid common man' As are
you and everyone else. I know a few things that not everyone does, a
few things that very few do, and I can analyze alternatives when
presented to me, and sometimes detect bullshit. however, the number
of things I do know divided by the number of things I do not know is
zero, just like everyone else. I am generally capable of recognizing
sarcasm, however, you must remember, this is usenet, where absolute
stupidity is presented as serious analysis.
> > Ever looked at the promises of a vendor?
> Huh?
"righties" tend to be businessmen, or to put it another way,
"vendors". They make claims about what their company can do that are
as absurd as the claims the lefties make about what their company (the
US government) can do. Remember, when you hear a "rightie" politician
speak, you are hearing a *loser* of a rightie.
> > YES, righties are guilty of promising undeliverables, just not in
> > the same place as lefties. So, when they make that accusation,
> > believe them.
> Huh? I may need some examples in order to grasp your wisdom.
just read any product brochure and you will see an example of
lies perpetrated by "righties".
> > perpetrated that crime. being mugged does not make you a mugger.
> Thanks for clearing that up.
>
> > However, if you have not been mugged and suspect everyone of wanting
> > to mug you, then the odds are, you are a mugger.
> More likely, they are off your meds.
That's another option.
> > B) righties do not accuse lefties of being "lazy moochers who
> > want to suckle the of the working class", they accuse them of
> > being exploitive of the blind stupidity of the common man and of
> > promising things they cannot deliver.
> I don't know where *you* stand (presumably far above the 'stupid common
> man') but you certainly are not a connoisseur of sarcasm.
In MANY respects, I am *exactly* the 'stupid common man' As are
you and everyone else. I know a few things that not everyone does, a
few things that very few do, and I can analyze alternatives when
presented to me, and sometimes detect bullshit. however, the number
of things I do know divided by the number of things I do not know is
zero, just like everyone else. I am generally capable of recognizing
sarcasm, however, you must remember, this is usenet, where absolute
stupidity is presented as serious analysis.
> > Ever looked at the promises of a vendor?
> Huh?
"righties" tend to be businessmen, or to put it another way,
"vendors". They make claims about what their company can do that are
as absurd as the claims the lefties make about what their company (the
US government) can do. Remember, when you hear a "rightie" politician
speak, you are hearing a *loser* of a rightie.
> > YES, righties are guilty of promising undeliverables, just not in
> > the same place as lefties. So, when they make that accusation,
> > believe them.
> Huh? I may need some examples in order to grasp your wisdom.
just read any product brochure and you will see an example of
lies perpetrated by "righties".
11-01-2007 | 10:38 PM
#138
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
bill wrote:
>>> A) Being the victim of a crime does not mean that you
>>> perpetrated that crime. being mugged does not make you a mugger.
>> Thanks for clearing that up.
>>
>>> However, if you have not been mugged and suspect everyone of wanting
>>> to mug you, then the odds are, you are a mugger.
>> More likely, they are off your meds.
>
> That's another option.
>
>>> B) righties do not accuse lefties of being "lazy moochers who
>>> want to suckle the of the working class", they accuse them of
>>> being exploitive of the blind stupidity of the common man and of
>>> promising things they cannot deliver.
>> I don't know where *you* stand (presumably far above the 'stupid common
>> man') but you certainly are not a connoisseur of sarcasm.
> In MANY respects, I am *exactly* the 'stupid common man' As are
> you and everyone else. I know a few things that not everyone does, a
> few things that very few do, and I can analyze alternatives when
> presented to me, and sometimes detect bullshit. however, the number
> of things I do know divided by the number of things I do not know is
> zero, just like everyone else. I am generally capable of recognizing
> sarcasm, however, you must remember, this is usenet, where absolute
> stupidity is presented as serious analysis.
LOL, truer words..................
>
>>> Ever looked at the promises of a vendor?
>> Huh?
> "righties" tend to be businessmen, or to put it another way,
> "vendors". They make claims about what their company can do that are
> as absurd as the claims the lefties make about what their company (the
> US government) can do. Remember, when you hear a "rightie" politician
> speak, you are hearing a *loser* of a rightie.
Over generalizations, IMO.
>>> A) Being the victim of a crime does not mean that you
>>> perpetrated that crime. being mugged does not make you a mugger.
>> Thanks for clearing that up.
>>
>>> However, if you have not been mugged and suspect everyone of wanting
>>> to mug you, then the odds are, you are a mugger.
>> More likely, they are off your meds.
>
> That's another option.
>
>>> B) righties do not accuse lefties of being "lazy moochers who
>>> want to suckle the of the working class", they accuse them of
>>> being exploitive of the blind stupidity of the common man and of
>>> promising things they cannot deliver.
>> I don't know where *you* stand (presumably far above the 'stupid common
>> man') but you certainly are not a connoisseur of sarcasm.
> In MANY respects, I am *exactly* the 'stupid common man' As are
> you and everyone else. I know a few things that not everyone does, a
> few things that very few do, and I can analyze alternatives when
> presented to me, and sometimes detect bullshit. however, the number
> of things I do know divided by the number of things I do not know is
> zero, just like everyone else. I am generally capable of recognizing
> sarcasm, however, you must remember, this is usenet, where absolute
> stupidity is presented as serious analysis.
LOL, truer words..................
>
>>> Ever looked at the promises of a vendor?
>> Huh?
> "righties" tend to be businessmen, or to put it another way,
> "vendors". They make claims about what their company can do that are
> as absurd as the claims the lefties make about what their company (the
> US government) can do. Remember, when you hear a "rightie" politician
> speak, you are hearing a *loser* of a rightie.
Over generalizations, IMO.
11-01-2007 | 10:38 PM
#139
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
bill wrote:
>>> A) Being the victim of a crime does not mean that you
>>> perpetrated that crime. being mugged does not make you a mugger.
>> Thanks for clearing that up.
>>
>>> However, if you have not been mugged and suspect everyone of wanting
>>> to mug you, then the odds are, you are a mugger.
>> More likely, they are off your meds.
>
> That's another option.
>
>>> B) righties do not accuse lefties of being "lazy moochers who
>>> want to suckle the of the working class", they accuse them of
>>> being exploitive of the blind stupidity of the common man and of
>>> promising things they cannot deliver.
>> I don't know where *you* stand (presumably far above the 'stupid common
>> man') but you certainly are not a connoisseur of sarcasm.
> In MANY respects, I am *exactly* the 'stupid common man' As are
> you and everyone else. I know a few things that not everyone does, a
> few things that very few do, and I can analyze alternatives when
> presented to me, and sometimes detect bullshit. however, the number
> of things I do know divided by the number of things I do not know is
> zero, just like everyone else. I am generally capable of recognizing
> sarcasm, however, you must remember, this is usenet, where absolute
> stupidity is presented as serious analysis.
LOL, truer words..................
>
>>> Ever looked at the promises of a vendor?
>> Huh?
> "righties" tend to be businessmen, or to put it another way,
> "vendors". They make claims about what their company can do that are
> as absurd as the claims the lefties make about what their company (the
> US government) can do. Remember, when you hear a "rightie" politician
> speak, you are hearing a *loser* of a rightie.
Over generalizations, IMO.
>>> A) Being the victim of a crime does not mean that you
>>> perpetrated that crime. being mugged does not make you a mugger.
>> Thanks for clearing that up.
>>
>>> However, if you have not been mugged and suspect everyone of wanting
>>> to mug you, then the odds are, you are a mugger.
>> More likely, they are off your meds.
>
> That's another option.
>
>>> B) righties do not accuse lefties of being "lazy moochers who
>>> want to suckle the of the working class", they accuse them of
>>> being exploitive of the blind stupidity of the common man and of
>>> promising things they cannot deliver.
>> I don't know where *you* stand (presumably far above the 'stupid common
>> man') but you certainly are not a connoisseur of sarcasm.
> In MANY respects, I am *exactly* the 'stupid common man' As are
> you and everyone else. I know a few things that not everyone does, a
> few things that very few do, and I can analyze alternatives when
> presented to me, and sometimes detect bullshit. however, the number
> of things I do know divided by the number of things I do not know is
> zero, just like everyone else. I am generally capable of recognizing
> sarcasm, however, you must remember, this is usenet, where absolute
> stupidity is presented as serious analysis.
LOL, truer words..................
>
>>> Ever looked at the promises of a vendor?
>> Huh?
> "righties" tend to be businessmen, or to put it another way,
> "vendors". They make claims about what their company can do that are
> as absurd as the claims the lefties make about what their company (the
> US government) can do. Remember, when you hear a "rightie" politician
> speak, you are hearing a *loser* of a rightie.
Over generalizations, IMO.
11-01-2007 | 10:44 PM
#140
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Nov 1, 10:38 pm, "F.H." <connec...@verizon.net> wrote:
> bill wrote:
> >>> A) Being the victim of a crime does not mean that you
> >>> perpetrated that crime. being mugged does not make you a mugger.
> >> Thanks for clearing that up.
>
> >>> However, if you have not been mugged and suspect everyone of wanting
> >>> to mug you, then the odds are, you are a mugger.
> >> More likely, they are off your meds.
>
> > That's another option.
>
> >>> B) righties do not accuse lefties of being "lazy moochers who
> >>> want to suckle the of the working class", they accuse them of
> >>> being exploitive of the blind stupidity of the common man and of
> >>> promising things they cannot deliver.
> >> I don't know where *you* stand (presumably far above the 'stupid common
> >> man') but you certainly are not a connoisseur of sarcasm.
> > In MANY respects, I am *exactly* the 'stupid common man' As are
> > you and everyone else. I know a few things that not everyone does, a
> > few things that very few do, and I can analyze alternatives when
> > presented to me, and sometimes detect bullshit. however, the number
> > of things I do know divided by the number of things I do not know is
> > zero, just like everyone else. I am generally capable of recognizing
> > sarcasm, however, you must remember, this is usenet, where absolute
> > stupidity is presented as serious analysis.
> LOL, truer words..................
>
> >>> Ever looked at the promises of a vendor?
> >> Huh?
> > "righties" tend to be businessmen, or to put it another way,
> > "vendors". They make claims about what their company can do that are
> > as absurd as the claims the lefties make about what their company (the
> > US government) can do. Remember, when you hear a "rightie" politician
> > speak, you are hearing a *loser* of a rightie.
>
> Over generalizations, IMO.
Probably. However, it is an over-generalization of an observable
phenomenon. Speak to *any* business owner, 9 times out of 10, he/she
will be pretty conservative (the 10th will be a government contracting
company of one stripe or another).
> bill wrote:
> >>> A) Being the victim of a crime does not mean that you
> >>> perpetrated that crime. being mugged does not make you a mugger.
> >> Thanks for clearing that up.
>
> >>> However, if you have not been mugged and suspect everyone of wanting
> >>> to mug you, then the odds are, you are a mugger.
> >> More likely, they are off your meds.
>
> > That's another option.
>
> >>> B) righties do not accuse lefties of being "lazy moochers who
> >>> want to suckle the of the working class", they accuse them of
> >>> being exploitive of the blind stupidity of the common man and of
> >>> promising things they cannot deliver.
> >> I don't know where *you* stand (presumably far above the 'stupid common
> >> man') but you certainly are not a connoisseur of sarcasm.
> > In MANY respects, I am *exactly* the 'stupid common man' As are
> > you and everyone else. I know a few things that not everyone does, a
> > few things that very few do, and I can analyze alternatives when
> > presented to me, and sometimes detect bullshit. however, the number
> > of things I do know divided by the number of things I do not know is
> > zero, just like everyone else. I am generally capable of recognizing
> > sarcasm, however, you must remember, this is usenet, where absolute
> > stupidity is presented as serious analysis.
> LOL, truer words..................
>
> >>> Ever looked at the promises of a vendor?
> >> Huh?
> > "righties" tend to be businessmen, or to put it another way,
> > "vendors". They make claims about what their company can do that are
> > as absurd as the claims the lefties make about what their company (the
> > US government) can do. Remember, when you hear a "rightie" politician
> > speak, you are hearing a *loser* of a rightie.
>
> Over generalizations, IMO.
Probably. However, it is an over-generalization of an observable
phenomenon. Speak to *any* business owner, 9 times out of 10, he/she
will be pretty conservative (the 10th will be a government contracting
company of one stripe or another).
11-01-2007 | 10:44 PM
#141
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Nov 1, 10:38 pm, "F.H." <connec...@verizon.net> wrote:
> bill wrote:
> >>> A) Being the victim of a crime does not mean that you
> >>> perpetrated that crime. being mugged does not make you a mugger.
> >> Thanks for clearing that up.
>
> >>> However, if you have not been mugged and suspect everyone of wanting
> >>> to mug you, then the odds are, you are a mugger.
> >> More likely, they are off your meds.
>
> > That's another option.
>
> >>> B) righties do not accuse lefties of being "lazy moochers who
> >>> want to suckle the of the working class", they accuse them of
> >>> being exploitive of the blind stupidity of the common man and of
> >>> promising things they cannot deliver.
> >> I don't know where *you* stand (presumably far above the 'stupid common
> >> man') but you certainly are not a connoisseur of sarcasm.
> > In MANY respects, I am *exactly* the 'stupid common man' As are
> > you and everyone else. I know a few things that not everyone does, a
> > few things that very few do, and I can analyze alternatives when
> > presented to me, and sometimes detect bullshit. however, the number
> > of things I do know divided by the number of things I do not know is
> > zero, just like everyone else. I am generally capable of recognizing
> > sarcasm, however, you must remember, this is usenet, where absolute
> > stupidity is presented as serious analysis.
> LOL, truer words..................
>
> >>> Ever looked at the promises of a vendor?
> >> Huh?
> > "righties" tend to be businessmen, or to put it another way,
> > "vendors". They make claims about what their company can do that are
> > as absurd as the claims the lefties make about what their company (the
> > US government) can do. Remember, when you hear a "rightie" politician
> > speak, you are hearing a *loser* of a rightie.
>
> Over generalizations, IMO.
Probably. However, it is an over-generalization of an observable
phenomenon. Speak to *any* business owner, 9 times out of 10, he/she
will be pretty conservative (the 10th will be a government contracting
company of one stripe or another).
> bill wrote:
> >>> A) Being the victim of a crime does not mean that you
> >>> perpetrated that crime. being mugged does not make you a mugger.
> >> Thanks for clearing that up.
>
> >>> However, if you have not been mugged and suspect everyone of wanting
> >>> to mug you, then the odds are, you are a mugger.
> >> More likely, they are off your meds.
>
> > That's another option.
>
> >>> B) righties do not accuse lefties of being "lazy moochers who
> >>> want to suckle the of the working class", they accuse them of
> >>> being exploitive of the blind stupidity of the common man and of
> >>> promising things they cannot deliver.
> >> I don't know where *you* stand (presumably far above the 'stupid common
> >> man') but you certainly are not a connoisseur of sarcasm.
> > In MANY respects, I am *exactly* the 'stupid common man' As are
> > you and everyone else. I know a few things that not everyone does, a
> > few things that very few do, and I can analyze alternatives when
> > presented to me, and sometimes detect bullshit. however, the number
> > of things I do know divided by the number of things I do not know is
> > zero, just like everyone else. I am generally capable of recognizing
> > sarcasm, however, you must remember, this is usenet, where absolute
> > stupidity is presented as serious analysis.
> LOL, truer words..................
>
> >>> Ever looked at the promises of a vendor?
> >> Huh?
> > "righties" tend to be businessmen, or to put it another way,
> > "vendors". They make claims about what their company can do that are
> > as absurd as the claims the lefties make about what their company (the
> > US government) can do. Remember, when you hear a "rightie" politician
> > speak, you are hearing a *loser* of a rightie.
>
> Over generalizations, IMO.
Probably. However, it is an over-generalization of an observable
phenomenon. Speak to *any* business owner, 9 times out of 10, he/she
will be pretty conservative (the 10th will be a government contracting
company of one stripe or another).
11-02-2007 | 01:15 AM
#142
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
<hhc314@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1193963413.853590.273640@o80g2000hse.googlegr oups.com...
> On Oct 27, 8:16 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "bill" <ford_prefec...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1193456816.362356.101020@z9g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com...
>>
>> > The most recent planned
>> > nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and
>> > never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to
>> > stop.
>>
>> It never went operational? Are you sure about that?
>
> Actually, "The construction permit for the plant was granted in 1976
> and construction on Unit 1 was completed in 1986. Full power operation
> of Unit 1 began in 1990."
>
> The "Clamshell Alliance" effective prevented the 3 additional reactors
> from being placed into operations, a terrible thing for the Northeast
> US.
>
> See this link:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seabroo...ar_Power_Plant
>
> If you really want to have some fun, try to find out what or who the
> "Clamshell Alliance" is. It will surprise you to learn who was in back
> of this terrible conspriacy perpretrated on the home owners and
> families here in New England.
>
> Harry C.
You already know. Save me the trip.
news:1193963413.853590.273640@o80g2000hse.googlegr oups.com...
> On Oct 27, 8:16 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "bill" <ford_prefec...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1193456816.362356.101020@z9g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com...
>>
>> > The most recent planned
>> > nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and
>> > never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to
>> > stop.
>>
>> It never went operational? Are you sure about that?
>
> Actually, "The construction permit for the plant was granted in 1976
> and construction on Unit 1 was completed in 1986. Full power operation
> of Unit 1 began in 1990."
>
> The "Clamshell Alliance" effective prevented the 3 additional reactors
> from being placed into operations, a terrible thing for the Northeast
> US.
>
> See this link:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seabroo...ar_Power_Plant
>
> If you really want to have some fun, try to find out what or who the
> "Clamshell Alliance" is. It will surprise you to learn who was in back
> of this terrible conspriacy perpretrated on the home owners and
> families here in New England.
>
> Harry C.
You already know. Save me the trip.
11-02-2007 | 01:15 AM
#143
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
<hhc314@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1193963413.853590.273640@o80g2000hse.googlegr oups.com...
> On Oct 27, 8:16 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "bill" <ford_prefec...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1193456816.362356.101020@z9g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com...
>>
>> > The most recent planned
>> > nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and
>> > never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to
>> > stop.
>>
>> It never went operational? Are you sure about that?
>
> Actually, "The construction permit for the plant was granted in 1976
> and construction on Unit 1 was completed in 1986. Full power operation
> of Unit 1 began in 1990."
>
> The "Clamshell Alliance" effective prevented the 3 additional reactors
> from being placed into operations, a terrible thing for the Northeast
> US.
>
> See this link:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seabroo...ar_Power_Plant
>
> If you really want to have some fun, try to find out what or who the
> "Clamshell Alliance" is. It will surprise you to learn who was in back
> of this terrible conspriacy perpretrated on the home owners and
> families here in New England.
>
> Harry C.
You already know. Save me the trip.
news:1193963413.853590.273640@o80g2000hse.googlegr oups.com...
> On Oct 27, 8:16 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "bill" <ford_prefec...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1193456816.362356.101020@z9g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com...
>>
>> > The most recent planned
>> > nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and
>> > never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to
>> > stop.
>>
>> It never went operational? Are you sure about that?
>
> Actually, "The construction permit for the plant was granted in 1976
> and construction on Unit 1 was completed in 1986. Full power operation
> of Unit 1 began in 1990."
>
> The "Clamshell Alliance" effective prevented the 3 additional reactors
> from being placed into operations, a terrible thing for the Northeast
> US.
>
> See this link:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seabroo...ar_Power_Plant
>
> If you really want to have some fun, try to find out what or who the
> "Clamshell Alliance" is. It will surprise you to learn who was in back
> of this terrible conspriacy perpretrated on the home owners and
> families here in New England.
>
> Harry C.
You already know. Save me the trip.
11-02-2007 | 07:46 AM
#146
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
"n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:du6dnYCn1YU_77fanZ2dnUVZ_t2inZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> Probably the same Communists that took over the student unions in the 60's
> and fed them all the bull they believed. And the same Communists that
> Teddy owes allegance to. (While his brother John turns over in his
> grave.)
Who told you to use the word "communists"?
news:du6dnYCn1YU_77fanZ2dnUVZ_t2inZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> Probably the same Communists that took over the student unions in the 60's
> and fed them all the bull they believed. And the same Communists that
> Teddy owes allegance to. (While his brother John turns over in his
> grave.)
Who told you to use the word "communists"?
11-02-2007 | 07:46 AM
#147
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
"n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:du6dnYCn1YU_77fanZ2dnUVZ_t2inZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> Probably the same Communists that took over the student unions in the 60's
> and fed them all the bull they believed. And the same Communists that
> Teddy owes allegance to. (While his brother John turns over in his
> grave.)
Who told you to use the word "communists"?
news:du6dnYCn1YU_77fanZ2dnUVZ_t2inZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> Probably the same Communists that took over the student unions in the 60's
> and fed them all the bull they believed. And the same Communists that
> Teddy owes allegance to. (While his brother John turns over in his
> grave.)
Who told you to use the word "communists"?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cake_and_eat_it_too@yahoo.com
Honda Mailing List
66
02-01-2009 01:06 AM
witfal
Honda Mailing List
0
10-26-2007 08:40 PM
Nobody
Honda Mailing List
19
03-15-2006 04:03 PM
John Horner
Honda Mailing List
18
07-16-2005 12:14 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)