BradGuth wrote:
> Yes it does. It all counts towards getting the most empg out of of
> whatever fossil or synfuel, and thereby contributing the least per
> mile CO2 and NOx into our badly polluted environment. It's a win-win,
> not half bad looking and affordable.
>
> - Brad Guth
>
>
> MadDog...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> On Jan 11, 7:25 pm, Joe <useful_in...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> More athttp://Muvy.org
>> Why do you endorse these fraudulentt claims?
>> Range with part of the energy coming from an initial charge
>> does not have anything to do with MPG.


Over the road travel the Generator will use 1- 1.5gal of fuel per
hour.... at 60 mph thats still only ~60 mpg... on a 10 hour trip you
only get the first 30 miles or so on the over night charge.

 

On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:56:33 -0500, Talk-n-Dog
<WatchDog@talk-n-dog..com> wrote:

>BradGuth wrote:
>> Yes it does. It all counts towards getting the most empg out of of
>> whatever fossil or synfuel, and thereby contributing the least per
>> mile CO2 and NOx into our badly polluted environment. It's a win-win,
>> not half bad looking and affordable.
>>
>> - Brad Guth
>>
>>
>> MadDog...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>> On Jan 11, 7:25 pm, Joe <useful_in...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> More athttp://Muvy.org
>>> Why do you endorse these fraudulentt claims?
>>> Range with part of the energy coming from an initial charge
>>> does not have anything to do with MPG.
>
>
>Over the road travel the Generator will use 1- 1.5gal of fuel per
>hour.... at 60 mph thats still only ~60 mpg... on a 10 hour trip you
>only get the first 30 miles or so on the over night charge.

True, although 60 mpg isn't bad. The big savings comes from the fact
that most cars are driven only 30 to 40 miles per day starting at and
returning to home where they could be charged overnight. If most of
your driving is 10 hour trips, a plug-in probably isn't a good choice.