New tire purchasing questions
12-04-2003 | 11:17 AM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
New tire purchasing questions
I've got a 99 Accord EX 4 cyl sedan 89,280 miles. I'm starting to look for
new tires. Currently I have Toyo Spectrums and I really like them. I
figure technology has changed so I should at least look at other
manufactures. Living in Colorado means there's a need for the tires to deal
with snow. Not the deep stuff but light fluff which unfortunately turns to
ice when driven on so there's really not much I can do about that. While
handling is very important to me having a quite tire is important too. I
drive to California 2-3 times a year. The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these tires
or have other recommendation? The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
aspects (MXV4 + energy). Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without messing
anything up?
TIA,
Rick
new tires. Currently I have Toyo Spectrums and I really like them. I
figure technology has changed so I should at least look at other
manufactures. Living in Colorado means there's a need for the tires to deal
with snow. Not the deep stuff but light fluff which unfortunately turns to
ice when driven on so there's really not much I can do about that. While
handling is very important to me having a quite tire is important too. I
drive to California 2-3 times a year. The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these tires
or have other recommendation? The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
aspects (MXV4 + energy). Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without messing
anything up?
TIA,
Rick
12-04-2003 | 12:52 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire purchasing questions
"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:76Jzb.8853
> The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these
tires
> or have other recommendation?
I've heard good things about the Turanza LS as well. Apparently very quiet,
too. As far as FZ4 - their winter traction is not so good - they're more
dry performance oriented, albeit still all-season.
The best all-season tire in terms of winter performance is currently Nokian
WR, in my opinion. I just got a set of those for my g/f's Jetta in
Wisconsin (she refuses to use dedicated winter tires, so the WR is the next
best thing), 195/65/15, H-rated.
> The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
> aspects (MXV4 + energy).
Heh... I had the same feelings. The worst all-season tires I've ever had.
> Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without
messing
> anything up?
You could plus-zero size to 205/60/15. It'll give you slightly more dry
grip and stability at higher speeds. It may increase fuel consumption
slightly due to higher rolling resistance.
Cheers,
Pete
12-04-2003 | 12:52 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire purchasing questions
"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:76Jzb.8853
> The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these
tires
> or have other recommendation?
I've heard good things about the Turanza LS as well. Apparently very quiet,
too. As far as FZ4 - their winter traction is not so good - they're more
dry performance oriented, albeit still all-season.
The best all-season tire in terms of winter performance is currently Nokian
WR, in my opinion. I just got a set of those for my g/f's Jetta in
Wisconsin (she refuses to use dedicated winter tires, so the WR is the next
best thing), 195/65/15, H-rated.
> The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
> aspects (MXV4 + energy).
Heh... I had the same feelings. The worst all-season tires I've ever had.
> Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without
messing
> anything up?
You could plus-zero size to 205/60/15. It'll give you slightly more dry
grip and stability at higher speeds. It may increase fuel consumption
slightly due to higher rolling resistance.
Cheers,
Pete
12-04-2003 | 12:52 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire purchasing questions
"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:76Jzb.8853
> The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these
tires
> or have other recommendation?
I've heard good things about the Turanza LS as well. Apparently very quiet,
too. As far as FZ4 - their winter traction is not so good - they're more
dry performance oriented, albeit still all-season.
The best all-season tire in terms of winter performance is currently Nokian
WR, in my opinion. I just got a set of those for my g/f's Jetta in
Wisconsin (she refuses to use dedicated winter tires, so the WR is the next
best thing), 195/65/15, H-rated.
> The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
> aspects (MXV4 + energy).
Heh... I had the same feelings. The worst all-season tires I've ever had.
> Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without
messing
> anything up?
You could plus-zero size to 205/60/15. It'll give you slightly more dry
grip and stability at higher speeds. It may increase fuel consumption
slightly due to higher rolling resistance.
Cheers,
Pete
12-04-2003 | 12:52 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire purchasing questions
"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:76Jzb.8853
> The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these
tires
> or have other recommendation?
I've heard good things about the Turanza LS as well. Apparently very quiet,
too. As far as FZ4 - their winter traction is not so good - they're more
dry performance oriented, albeit still all-season.
The best all-season tire in terms of winter performance is currently Nokian
WR, in my opinion. I just got a set of those for my g/f's Jetta in
Wisconsin (she refuses to use dedicated winter tires, so the WR is the next
best thing), 195/65/15, H-rated.
> The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
> aspects (MXV4 + energy).
Heh... I had the same feelings. The worst all-season tires I've ever had.
> Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without
messing
> anything up?
You could plus-zero size to 205/60/15. It'll give you slightly more dry
grip and stability at higher speeds. It may increase fuel consumption
slightly due to higher rolling resistance.
Cheers,
Pete
12-04-2003 | 01:39 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire purchasing questions
I put Turanza LSTs on my 01 Odyssey two weeks ago. No snow out east
yet, but I've put 1000+ miles on now and like them. Quiet, well rated.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:52:50 +0100, "Pete" <escape2music@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
>"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
>news:76Jzb.8853
>> The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
>> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these
>tires
>> or have other recommendation?
>
>I've heard good things about the Turanza LS as well. Apparently very quiet,
>too. As far as FZ4 - their winter traction is not so good - they're more
>dry performance oriented, albeit still all-season.
>
>The best all-season tire in terms of winter performance is currently Nokian
>WR, in my opinion. I just got a set of those for my g/f's Jetta in
>Wisconsin (she refuses to use dedicated winter tires, so the WR is the next
>best thing), 195/65/15, H-rated.
>
>
>> The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
>> aspects (MXV4 + energy).
>
>Heh... I had the same feelings. The worst all-season tires I've ever had.
>
>
>> Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
>> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without
>messing
>> anything up?
>
>You could plus-zero size to 205/60/15. It'll give you slightly more dry
>grip and stability at higher speeds. It may increase fuel consumption
>slightly due to higher rolling resistance.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Pete
>
yet, but I've put 1000+ miles on now and like them. Quiet, well rated.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:52:50 +0100, "Pete" <escape2music@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
>"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
>news:76Jzb.8853
>> The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
>> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these
>tires
>> or have other recommendation?
>
>I've heard good things about the Turanza LS as well. Apparently very quiet,
>too. As far as FZ4 - their winter traction is not so good - they're more
>dry performance oriented, albeit still all-season.
>
>The best all-season tire in terms of winter performance is currently Nokian
>WR, in my opinion. I just got a set of those for my g/f's Jetta in
>Wisconsin (she refuses to use dedicated winter tires, so the WR is the next
>best thing), 195/65/15, H-rated.
>
>
>> The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
>> aspects (MXV4 + energy).
>
>Heh... I had the same feelings. The worst all-season tires I've ever had.
>
>
>> Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
>> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without
>messing
>> anything up?
>
>You could plus-zero size to 205/60/15. It'll give you slightly more dry
>grip and stability at higher speeds. It may increase fuel consumption
>slightly due to higher rolling resistance.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Pete
>
12-04-2003 | 01:39 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire purchasing questions
I put Turanza LSTs on my 01 Odyssey two weeks ago. No snow out east
yet, but I've put 1000+ miles on now and like them. Quiet, well rated.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:52:50 +0100, "Pete" <escape2music@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
>"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
>news:76Jzb.8853
>> The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
>> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these
>tires
>> or have other recommendation?
>
>I've heard good things about the Turanza LS as well. Apparently very quiet,
>too. As far as FZ4 - their winter traction is not so good - they're more
>dry performance oriented, albeit still all-season.
>
>The best all-season tire in terms of winter performance is currently Nokian
>WR, in my opinion. I just got a set of those for my g/f's Jetta in
>Wisconsin (she refuses to use dedicated winter tires, so the WR is the next
>best thing), 195/65/15, H-rated.
>
>
>> The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
>> aspects (MXV4 + energy).
>
>Heh... I had the same feelings. The worst all-season tires I've ever had.
>
>
>> Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
>> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without
>messing
>> anything up?
>
>You could plus-zero size to 205/60/15. It'll give you slightly more dry
>grip and stability at higher speeds. It may increase fuel consumption
>slightly due to higher rolling resistance.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Pete
>
yet, but I've put 1000+ miles on now and like them. Quiet, well rated.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:52:50 +0100, "Pete" <escape2music@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
>"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
>news:76Jzb.8853
>> The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
>> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these
>tires
>> or have other recommendation?
>
>I've heard good things about the Turanza LS as well. Apparently very quiet,
>too. As far as FZ4 - their winter traction is not so good - they're more
>dry performance oriented, albeit still all-season.
>
>The best all-season tire in terms of winter performance is currently Nokian
>WR, in my opinion. I just got a set of those for my g/f's Jetta in
>Wisconsin (she refuses to use dedicated winter tires, so the WR is the next
>best thing), 195/65/15, H-rated.
>
>
>> The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
>> aspects (MXV4 + energy).
>
>Heh... I had the same feelings. The worst all-season tires I've ever had.
>
>
>> Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
>> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without
>messing
>> anything up?
>
>You could plus-zero size to 205/60/15. It'll give you slightly more dry
>grip and stability at higher speeds. It may increase fuel consumption
>slightly due to higher rolling resistance.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Pete
>
12-04-2003 | 01:39 PM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire purchasing questions
I put Turanza LSTs on my 01 Odyssey two weeks ago. No snow out east
yet, but I've put 1000+ miles on now and like them. Quiet, well rated.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:52:50 +0100, "Pete" <escape2music@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
>"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
>news:76Jzb.8853
>> The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
>> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these
>tires
>> or have other recommendation?
>
>I've heard good things about the Turanza LS as well. Apparently very quiet,
>too. As far as FZ4 - their winter traction is not so good - they're more
>dry performance oriented, albeit still all-season.
>
>The best all-season tire in terms of winter performance is currently Nokian
>WR, in my opinion. I just got a set of those for my g/f's Jetta in
>Wisconsin (she refuses to use dedicated winter tires, so the WR is the next
>best thing), 195/65/15, H-rated.
>
>
>> The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
>> aspects (MXV4 + energy).
>
>Heh... I had the same feelings. The worst all-season tires I've ever had.
>
>
>> Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
>> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without
>messing
>> anything up?
>
>You could plus-zero size to 205/60/15. It'll give you slightly more dry
>grip and stability at higher speeds. It may increase fuel consumption
>slightly due to higher rolling resistance.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Pete
>
yet, but I've put 1000+ miles on now and like them. Quiet, well rated.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:52:50 +0100, "Pete" <escape2music@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
>"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
>news:76Jzb.8853
>> The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
>> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these
>tires
>> or have other recommendation?
>
>I've heard good things about the Turanza LS as well. Apparently very quiet,
>too. As far as FZ4 - their winter traction is not so good - they're more
>dry performance oriented, albeit still all-season.
>
>The best all-season tire in terms of winter performance is currently Nokian
>WR, in my opinion. I just got a set of those for my g/f's Jetta in
>Wisconsin (she refuses to use dedicated winter tires, so the WR is the next
>best thing), 195/65/15, H-rated.
>
>
>> The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
>> aspects (MXV4 + energy).
>
>Heh... I had the same feelings. The worst all-season tires I've ever had.
>
>
>> Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
>> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without
>messing
>> anything up?
>
>You could plus-zero size to 205/60/15. It'll give you slightly more dry
>grip and stability at higher speeds. It may increase fuel consumption
>slightly due to higher rolling resistance.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Pete
>
12-04-2003 | 01:39 PM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire purchasing questions
I put Turanza LSTs on my 01 Odyssey two weeks ago. No snow out east
yet, but I've put 1000+ miles on now and like them. Quiet, well rated.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:52:50 +0100, "Pete" <escape2music@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
>"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
>news:76Jzb.8853
>> The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
>> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these
>tires
>> or have other recommendation?
>
>I've heard good things about the Turanza LS as well. Apparently very quiet,
>too. As far as FZ4 - their winter traction is not so good - they're more
>dry performance oriented, albeit still all-season.
>
>The best all-season tire in terms of winter performance is currently Nokian
>WR, in my opinion. I just got a set of those for my g/f's Jetta in
>Wisconsin (she refuses to use dedicated winter tires, so the WR is the next
>best thing), 195/65/15, H-rated.
>
>
>> The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
>> aspects (MXV4 + energy).
>
>Heh... I had the same feelings. The worst all-season tires I've ever had.
>
>
>> Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
>> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without
>messing
>> anything up?
>
>You could plus-zero size to 205/60/15. It'll give you slightly more dry
>grip and stability at higher speeds. It may increase fuel consumption
>slightly due to higher rolling resistance.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Pete
>
yet, but I've put 1000+ miles on now and like them. Quiet, well rated.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:52:50 +0100, "Pete" <escape2music@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
>"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
>news:76Jzb.8853
>> The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
>> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these
>tires
>> or have other recommendation?
>
>I've heard good things about the Turanza LS as well. Apparently very quiet,
>too. As far as FZ4 - their winter traction is not so good - they're more
>dry performance oriented, albeit still all-season.
>
>The best all-season tire in terms of winter performance is currently Nokian
>WR, in my opinion. I just got a set of those for my g/f's Jetta in
>Wisconsin (she refuses to use dedicated winter tires, so the WR is the next
>best thing), 195/65/15, H-rated.
>
>
>> The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
>> aspects (MXV4 + energy).
>
>Heh... I had the same feelings. The worst all-season tires I've ever had.
>
>
>> Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
>> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without
>messing
>> anything up?
>
>You could plus-zero size to 205/60/15. It'll give you slightly more dry
>grip and stability at higher speeds. It may increase fuel consumption
>slightly due to higher rolling resistance.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Pete
>
12-06-2003 | 12:37 PM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire purchasing questions
In article <76Jzb.8853$zL1.1902752@news1.news.adelphia.net> ,
razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net says...
> I'm starting to look for
> new tires
>
The November or December issue of Consumer Reports has a comparison of
tires - ice and snow traction are included. The test car was a 6th
generation Accord, so the results are especially relevant.
razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net says...
> I'm starting to look for
> new tires
>
The November or December issue of Consumer Reports has a comparison of
tires - ice and snow traction are included. The test car was a 6th
generation Accord, so the results are especially relevant.
12-06-2003 | 12:37 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire purchasing questions
In article <76Jzb.8853$zL1.1902752@news1.news.adelphia.net> ,
razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net says...
> I'm starting to look for
> new tires
>
The November or December issue of Consumer Reports has a comparison of
tires - ice and snow traction are included. The test car was a 6th
generation Accord, so the results are especially relevant.
razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net says...
> I'm starting to look for
> new tires
>
The November or December issue of Consumer Reports has a comparison of
tires - ice and snow traction are included. The test car was a 6th
generation Accord, so the results are especially relevant.
12-06-2003 | 12:37 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire purchasing questions
In article <76Jzb.8853$zL1.1902752@news1.news.adelphia.net> ,
razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net says...
> I'm starting to look for
> new tires
>
The November or December issue of Consumer Reports has a comparison of
tires - ice and snow traction are included. The test car was a 6th
generation Accord, so the results are especially relevant.
razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net says...
> I'm starting to look for
> new tires
>
The November or December issue of Consumer Reports has a comparison of
tires - ice and snow traction are included. The test car was a 6th
generation Accord, so the results are especially relevant.
12-06-2003 | 12:37 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire purchasing questions
In article <76Jzb.8853$zL1.1902752@news1.news.adelphia.net> ,
razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net says...
> I'm starting to look for
> new tires
>
The November or December issue of Consumer Reports has a comparison of
tires - ice and snow traction are included. The test car was a 6th
generation Accord, so the results are especially relevant.
razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net says...
> I'm starting to look for
> new tires
>
The November or December issue of Consumer Reports has a comparison of
tires - ice and snow traction are included. The test car was a 6th
generation Accord, so the results are especially relevant.
12-11-2003 | 10:45 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire purchasing questions
Don't know why your OEM Michelin's were so bad, but I just put a set of
Michelin HydroEdge tires on my 2000 Civic (185/65/14). HydroEdge tires are
relatively new to the market, and I only have about 1000 miles on 'em, but
so far they seem awesome. Really great handling in rain/wet snow, & living
in Canada, I was comforted to know that the HydroEdge has one of the lowest
freeze-points of any tires out there. It's cold up here!
-chris
"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:76Jzb.8853$zL1.1902752@news1.news.adelphia.ne t...
> I've got a 99 Accord EX 4 cyl sedan 89,280 miles. I'm starting to look
for
> new tires. Currently I have Toyo Spectrums and I really like them. I
> figure technology has changed so I should at least look at other
> manufactures. Living in Colorado means there's a need for the tires to
deal
> with snow. Not the deep stuff but light fluff which unfortunately turns
to
> ice when driven on so there's really not much I can do about that. While
> handling is very important to me having a quite tire is important too. I
> drive to California 2-3 times a year. The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these
tires
> or have other recommendation? The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
> aspects (MXV4 + energy). Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is
there
> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without
messing
> anything up?
>
> TIA,
>
> Rick
>
>
Michelin HydroEdge tires on my 2000 Civic (185/65/14). HydroEdge tires are
relatively new to the market, and I only have about 1000 miles on 'em, but
so far they seem awesome. Really great handling in rain/wet snow, & living
in Canada, I was comforted to know that the HydroEdge has one of the lowest
freeze-points of any tires out there. It's cold up here!
-chris
"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:76Jzb.8853$zL1.1902752@news1.news.adelphia.ne t...
> I've got a 99 Accord EX 4 cyl sedan 89,280 miles. I'm starting to look
for
> new tires. Currently I have Toyo Spectrums and I really like them. I
> figure technology has changed so I should at least look at other
> manufactures. Living in Colorado means there's a need for the tires to
deal
> with snow. Not the deep stuff but light fluff which unfortunately turns
to
> ice when driven on so there's really not much I can do about that. While
> handling is very important to me having a quite tire is important too. I
> drive to California 2-3 times a year. The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these
tires
> or have other recommendation? The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
> aspects (MXV4 + energy). Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is
there
> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without
messing
> anything up?
>
> TIA,
>
> Rick
>
>
12-11-2003 | 10:45 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire purchasing questions
Don't know why your OEM Michelin's were so bad, but I just put a set of
Michelin HydroEdge tires on my 2000 Civic (185/65/14). HydroEdge tires are
relatively new to the market, and I only have about 1000 miles on 'em, but
so far they seem awesome. Really great handling in rain/wet snow, & living
in Canada, I was comforted to know that the HydroEdge has one of the lowest
freeze-points of any tires out there. It's cold up here!
-chris
"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:76Jzb.8853$zL1.1902752@news1.news.adelphia.ne t...
> I've got a 99 Accord EX 4 cyl sedan 89,280 miles. I'm starting to look
for
> new tires. Currently I have Toyo Spectrums and I really like them. I
> figure technology has changed so I should at least look at other
> manufactures. Living in Colorado means there's a need for the tires to
deal
> with snow. Not the deep stuff but light fluff which unfortunately turns
to
> ice when driven on so there's really not much I can do about that. While
> handling is very important to me having a quite tire is important too. I
> drive to California 2-3 times a year. The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these
tires
> or have other recommendation? The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
> aspects (MXV4 + energy). Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is
there
> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without
messing
> anything up?
>
> TIA,
>
> Rick
>
>
Michelin HydroEdge tires on my 2000 Civic (185/65/14). HydroEdge tires are
relatively new to the market, and I only have about 1000 miles on 'em, but
so far they seem awesome. Really great handling in rain/wet snow, & living
in Canada, I was comforted to know that the HydroEdge has one of the lowest
freeze-points of any tires out there. It's cold up here!
-chris
"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:76Jzb.8853$zL1.1902752@news1.news.adelphia.ne t...
> I've got a 99 Accord EX 4 cyl sedan 89,280 miles. I'm starting to look
for
> new tires. Currently I have Toyo Spectrums and I really like them. I
> figure technology has changed so I should at least look at other
> manufactures. Living in Colorado means there's a need for the tires to
deal
> with snow. Not the deep stuff but light fluff which unfortunately turns
to
> ice when driven on so there's really not much I can do about that. While
> handling is very important to me having a quite tire is important too. I
> drive to California 2-3 times a year. The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these
tires
> or have other recommendation? The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
> aspects (MXV4 + energy). Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is
there
> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without
messing
> anything up?
>
> TIA,
>
> Rick
>
>