Message response
07-23-2006 | 02:06 AM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Message response
This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
an "Re:" subject.
In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
follow.
John
group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
an "Re:" subject.
In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
follow.
John
07-23-2006 | 10:03 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Message response
The same reason they don't use spell check I guess.
John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
>
> John
John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
>
> John
07-23-2006 | 10:03 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Message response
The same reason they don't use spell check I guess.
John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
>
> John
John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
>
> John
07-23-2006 | 10:03 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Message response
The same reason they don't use spell check I guess.
John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
>
> John
John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
>
> John
07-23-2006 | 10:03 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Message response
The same reason they don't use spell check I guess.
John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
>
> John
John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
>
> John
07-24-2006 | 03:22 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Message response
John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
Not everyone's newsreader supports proper threading. Some newsservers may not
either. Deal with it.
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
Not everyone's newsreader supports proper threading. Some newsservers may not
either. Deal with it.
07-24-2006 | 03:22 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Message response
John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
Not everyone's newsreader supports proper threading. Some newsservers may not
either. Deal with it.
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
Not everyone's newsreader supports proper threading. Some newsservers may not
either. Deal with it.
07-24-2006 | 03:22 PM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Message response
John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
Not everyone's newsreader supports proper threading. Some newsservers may not
either. Deal with it.
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
Not everyone's newsreader supports proper threading. Some newsservers may not
either. Deal with it.
07-24-2006 | 03:22 PM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Message response
John Smith wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
Not everyone's newsreader supports proper threading. Some newsservers may not
either. Deal with it.
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
Not everyone's newsreader supports proper threading. Some newsservers may not
either. Deal with it.
07-24-2006 | 03:38 PM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Message response
In article <44C311D4.9B6BCE1A@aol.com>, John Smith <jsmith@aol.com>
wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
threaded. check your preferences.
wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
threaded. check your preferences.
07-24-2006 | 03:38 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Message response
In article <44C311D4.9B6BCE1A@aol.com>, John Smith <jsmith@aol.com>
wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
threaded. check your preferences.
wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
threaded. check your preferences.
07-24-2006 | 03:38 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Message response
In article <44C311D4.9B6BCE1A@aol.com>, John Smith <jsmith@aol.com>
wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
threaded. check your preferences.
wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
threaded. check your preferences.
07-24-2006 | 03:38 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Message response
In article <44C311D4.9B6BCE1A@aol.com>, John Smith <jsmith@aol.com>
wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
threaded. check your preferences.
wrote:
> This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> an "Re:" subject.
>
> In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> follow.
Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
threaded. check your preferences.
07-25-2006 | 12:44 AM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Message response
Sorry, 4 other news groups all show up threaded. Matt's reply makes sense
though.
John
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" wrote:
> In article <44C311D4.9B6BCE1A@aol.com>, John Smith <jsmith@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> > group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> > the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> > an "Re:" subject.
> >
> > In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> > maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> > the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> > follow.
>
> Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
> threaded. check your preferences.
though.
John
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" wrote:
> In article <44C311D4.9B6BCE1A@aol.com>, John Smith <jsmith@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> > group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> > the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> > an "Re:" subject.
> >
> > In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> > maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> > the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> > follow.
>
> Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
> threaded. check your preferences.
07-25-2006 | 12:44 AM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Message response
Sorry, 4 other news groups all show up threaded. Matt's reply makes sense
though.
John
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" wrote:
> In article <44C311D4.9B6BCE1A@aol.com>, John Smith <jsmith@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> > group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> > the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> > an "Re:" subject.
> >
> > In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> > maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> > the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> > follow.
>
> Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
> threaded. check your preferences.
though.
John
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" wrote:
> In article <44C311D4.9B6BCE1A@aol.com>, John Smith <jsmith@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This is off subject, but is there a reason that people in this news
> > group don't reply to the original message so that there is a thread for
> > the original question rather that sending a new messafe each time with
> > an "Re:" subject.
> >
> > In my experience it makes it much easier to follow the responses and
> > maintain continuity for each subject as opposed to having to search down
> > the list for ht enext"Re:" that concerns the thread you are trying to
> > follow.
>
> Your newsreader may be configured to show everything "flat" instead of
> threaded. check your preferences.