Maintenace Required Light
08-07-2005 | 08:24 PM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Maintenace Required Light
Paul wrote:
> I found the answer to my own question here:
>
> http://www.honda-acura.net/forums/ar...p/t-47758.html
>
> Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all the
> know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say except to
> answer the question.
>
> Paul
>
>
Thank you for the link. That's one to bookmark.
> I found the answer to my own question here:
>
> http://www.honda-acura.net/forums/ar...p/t-47758.html
>
> Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all the
> know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say except to
> answer the question.
>
> Paul
>
>
Thank you for the link. That's one to bookmark.
08-08-2005 | 10:27 PM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Maintenace Required Light
"Bluegoose" <bac2bac@comcast2005.net> wrote in message
news:9-adneTN1qq_mWjfRVn-vg@comcast.com...
> Again, this was not covered in My owners manual, just take it in and have
> them check it type stufff.
Are you sure you're not mixing up the description of the Service Engine and
Maintenance Required lights? One is resettable via the dash (MRL) the other
requires a scan tool (SER).
news:9-adneTN1qq_mWjfRVn-vg@comcast.com...
> Again, this was not covered in My owners manual, just take it in and have
> them check it type stufff.
Are you sure you're not mixing up the description of the Service Engine and
Maintenance Required lights? One is resettable via the dash (MRL) the other
requires a scan tool (SER).
08-08-2005 | 10:27 PM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Maintenace Required Light
"Bluegoose" <bac2bac@comcast2005.net> wrote in message
news:9-adneTN1qq_mWjfRVn-vg@comcast.com...
> Again, this was not covered in My owners manual, just take it in and have
> them check it type stufff.
Are you sure you're not mixing up the description of the Service Engine and
Maintenance Required lights? One is resettable via the dash (MRL) the other
requires a scan tool (SER).
news:9-adneTN1qq_mWjfRVn-vg@comcast.com...
> Again, this was not covered in My owners manual, just take it in and have
> them check it type stufff.
Are you sure you're not mixing up the description of the Service Engine and
Maintenance Required lights? One is resettable via the dash (MRL) the other
requires a scan tool (SER).
08-08-2005 | 10:30 PM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Maintenace Required Light
"Paul" <me@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
>
> Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all the
> know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say except
> to
> answer the question.
Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually the
more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious problem in
the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your FIRST
line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the previously
covered topics, then if not found ask.
Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
>
> Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all the
> know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say except
> to
> answer the question.
Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually the
more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious problem in
the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your FIRST
line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the previously
covered topics, then if not found ask.
Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
08-08-2005 | 10:30 PM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Maintenace Required Light
"Paul" <me@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
>
> Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all the
> know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say except
> to
> answer the question.
Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually the
more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious problem in
the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your FIRST
line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the previously
covered topics, then if not found ask.
Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
>
> Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all the
> know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say except
> to
> answer the question.
Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually the
more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious problem in
the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your FIRST
line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the previously
covered topics, then if not found ask.
Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
08-09-2005 | 09:04 PM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Maintenace Required Light
"Seth" <seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:XGTJe.3601$cg.2037@news02.roc.ny...
> "Paul" <me@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all the
>> know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say except
>> to
>> answer the question.
>
> Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually the
> more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious problem
> in the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your
> FIRST line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the
> previously covered topics, then if not found ask.
>
> Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
> here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
>
I have recently become one of the legion advising every driver to read the
owner's manual front to back. I've come across a couple posts (in other
groups) by people who may have damaged their car by doing what they didn't
know was wrong although the manual said it plainly. In Hondas, the timing
belt change interval and not shifting automatics forward/reverse while
rolling are good examples. RTFM or pay dearly.
Mike
news:XGTJe.3601$cg.2037@news02.roc.ny...
> "Paul" <me@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all the
>> know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say except
>> to
>> answer the question.
>
> Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually the
> more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious problem
> in the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your
> FIRST line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the
> previously covered topics, then if not found ask.
>
> Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
> here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
>
I have recently become one of the legion advising every driver to read the
owner's manual front to back. I've come across a couple posts (in other
groups) by people who may have damaged their car by doing what they didn't
know was wrong although the manual said it plainly. In Hondas, the timing
belt change interval and not shifting automatics forward/reverse while
rolling are good examples. RTFM or pay dearly.
Mike
08-09-2005 | 09:04 PM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Maintenace Required Light
"Seth" <seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:XGTJe.3601$cg.2037@news02.roc.ny...
> "Paul" <me@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all the
>> know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say except
>> to
>> answer the question.
>
> Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually the
> more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious problem
> in the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your
> FIRST line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the
> previously covered topics, then if not found ask.
>
> Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
> here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
>
I have recently become one of the legion advising every driver to read the
owner's manual front to back. I've come across a couple posts (in other
groups) by people who may have damaged their car by doing what they didn't
know was wrong although the manual said it plainly. In Hondas, the timing
belt change interval and not shifting automatics forward/reverse while
rolling are good examples. RTFM or pay dearly.
Mike
news:XGTJe.3601$cg.2037@news02.roc.ny...
> "Paul" <me@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all the
>> know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say except
>> to
>> answer the question.
>
> Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually the
> more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious problem
> in the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your
> FIRST line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the
> previously covered topics, then if not found ask.
>
> Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
> here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
>
I have recently become one of the legion advising every driver to read the
owner's manual front to back. I've come across a couple posts (in other
groups) by people who may have damaged their car by doing what they didn't
know was wrong although the manual said it plainly. In Hondas, the timing
belt change interval and not shifting automatics forward/reverse while
rolling are good examples. RTFM or pay dearly.
Mike
08-10-2005 | 01:10 AM
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Maintenace Required Light
>
> ----------------------
>
>
> Has HOnDA stopped the practice of including OWNER'S MANUALS with their
> vehicles? My '97 and my '98 both came with one . . . . .
>
> 'Curly'
>
not everyone bought their car new. I have had 2 hondas now (used) and
neither came with any manuals. Off to Ebay to get one everytime.
> ----------------------
>
>
> Has HOnDA stopped the practice of including OWNER'S MANUALS with their
> vehicles? My '97 and my '98 both came with one . . . . .
>
> 'Curly'
>
not everyone bought their car new. I have had 2 hondas now (used) and
neither came with any manuals. Off to Ebay to get one everytime.
08-10-2005 | 01:10 AM
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Maintenace Required Light
>
> ----------------------
>
>
> Has HOnDA stopped the practice of including OWNER'S MANUALS with their
> vehicles? My '97 and my '98 both came with one . . . . .
>
> 'Curly'
>
not everyone bought their car new. I have had 2 hondas now (used) and
neither came with any manuals. Off to Ebay to get one everytime.
> ----------------------
>
>
> Has HOnDA stopped the practice of including OWNER'S MANUALS with their
> vehicles? My '97 and my '98 both came with one . . . . .
>
> 'Curly'
>
not everyone bought their car new. I have had 2 hondas now (used) and
neither came with any manuals. Off to Ebay to get one everytime.
08-10-2005 | 01:12 AM
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Maintenace Required Light
"Seth" <seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:XGTJe.3601$cg.2037@news02.roc.ny...
> "Paul" <me@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all
the
> > know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say except
> > to
> > answer the question.
>
> Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually the
> more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious problem
in
> the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your
FIRST
> line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the
previously
> covered topics, then if not found ask.
>
> Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
> here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
>
Assuming that the poster has an owners manual.
08-10-2005 | 01:12 AM
#41
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Maintenace Required Light
"Seth" <seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:XGTJe.3601$cg.2037@news02.roc.ny...
> "Paul" <me@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all
the
> > know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say except
> > to
> > answer the question.
>
> Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually the
> more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious problem
in
> the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your
FIRST
> line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the
previously
> covered topics, then if not found ask.
>
> Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
> here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
>
Assuming that the poster has an owners manual.
08-12-2005 | 05:44 PM
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Maintenace Required Light
"RM" <rm@blah.blah> wrote in message
news:Q8fKe.34299$Di2.6056@fe02.news.easynews.com.. .
>
> "Seth" <seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:XGTJe.3601$cg.2037@news02.roc.ny...
>> "Paul" <me@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
>> >
>> > Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all
> the
>> > know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say
>> > except
>> > to
>> > answer the question.
>>
>> Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually the
>> more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious problem
> in
>> the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your
> FIRST
>> line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the
> previously
>> covered topics, then if not found ask.
>>
>> Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
>> here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
>>
> Assuming that the poster has an owners manual.
That still leaves scanning to see if the question has already been asked and
answered. That is obviously available if they found this group to post in.
news:Q8fKe.34299$Di2.6056@fe02.news.easynews.com.. .
>
> "Seth" <seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:XGTJe.3601$cg.2037@news02.roc.ny...
>> "Paul" <me@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
>> >
>> > Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all
> the
>> > know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say
>> > except
>> > to
>> > answer the question.
>>
>> Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually the
>> more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious problem
> in
>> the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your
> FIRST
>> line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the
> previously
>> covered topics, then if not found ask.
>>
>> Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
>> here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
>>
> Assuming that the poster has an owners manual.
That still leaves scanning to see if the question has already been asked and
answered. That is obviously available if they found this group to post in.
08-12-2005 | 05:44 PM
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Maintenace Required Light
"RM" <rm@blah.blah> wrote in message
news:Q8fKe.34299$Di2.6056@fe02.news.easynews.com.. .
>
> "Seth" <seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:XGTJe.3601$cg.2037@news02.roc.ny...
>> "Paul" <me@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
>> >
>> > Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all
> the
>> > know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say
>> > except
>> > to
>> > answer the question.
>>
>> Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually the
>> more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious problem
> in
>> the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your
> FIRST
>> line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the
> previously
>> covered topics, then if not found ask.
>>
>> Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
>> here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
>>
> Assuming that the poster has an owners manual.
That still leaves scanning to see if the question has already been asked and
answered. That is obviously available if they found this group to post in.
news:Q8fKe.34299$Di2.6056@fe02.news.easynews.com.. .
>
> "Seth" <seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:XGTJe.3601$cg.2037@news02.roc.ny...
>> "Paul" <me@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
>> >
>> > Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all
> the
>> > know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say
>> > except
>> > to
>> > answer the question.
>>
>> Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually the
>> more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious problem
> in
>> the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your
> FIRST
>> line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the
> previously
>> covered topics, then if not found ask.
>>
>> Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
>> here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
>>
> Assuming that the poster has an owners manual.
That still leaves scanning to see if the question has already been asked and
answered. That is obviously available if they found this group to post in.
08-12-2005 | 06:37 PM
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Maintenace Required Light
Seth wrote:
> "RM" <rm@blah.blah> wrote in message
> news:Q8fKe.34299$Di2.6056@fe02.news.easynews.com.. .
>
>>
>> "Seth" <seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:XGTJe.3601$cg.2037@news02.roc.ny...
>>
>>> "Paul" <me@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
>>> >
>>> > Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all
>>
>> the
>>
>>> > know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say >
>>> except
>>> > to
>>> > answer the question.
>>>
>>> Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually
>>> the
>>> more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious
>>> problem
>>
>> in
>>
>>> the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your
>>
>> FIRST
>>
>>> line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the
>>
>> previously
>>
>>> covered topics, then if not found ask.
>>>
>>> Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
>>> here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
>>>
>> Assuming that the poster has an owners manual.
>
>
> That still leaves scanning to see if the question has already been asked
> and answered. That is obviously available if they found this group to
> post in.
>
I appreciate the courtesy of the individuals who did answer this
question for me. It was very kind.
You're right, of course. Spending time scanning a large newsgroup would
yield some results, but then we wouldn't have had this encouraging
exchange, would we? It would have saved us all a lot of time.
I was simply amazed to see this thread still ongoing. I was amazed also
to see that some who want to save themselves from aggravation and time
by flaming those who ask innocent questions, even if the questions had
been asked before, spent even *more* time discussing/arguing these moot
points.
More amazing than anything is the attempt to police the internet. Even
government is having a hard time with that, and, if they succeeded, we'd
all be crying foul. Perhaps it's best to let some things go.
> "RM" <rm@blah.blah> wrote in message
> news:Q8fKe.34299$Di2.6056@fe02.news.easynews.com.. .
>
>>
>> "Seth" <seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:XGTJe.3601$cg.2037@news02.roc.ny...
>>
>>> "Paul" <me@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
>>> >
>>> > Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all
>>
>> the
>>
>>> > know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say >
>>> except
>>> > to
>>> > answer the question.
>>>
>>> Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually
>>> the
>>> more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious
>>> problem
>>
>> in
>>
>>> the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your
>>
>> FIRST
>>
>>> line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the
>>
>> previously
>>
>>> covered topics, then if not found ask.
>>>
>>> Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
>>> here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
>>>
>> Assuming that the poster has an owners manual.
>
>
> That still leaves scanning to see if the question has already been asked
> and answered. That is obviously available if they found this group to
> post in.
>
I appreciate the courtesy of the individuals who did answer this
question for me. It was very kind.
You're right, of course. Spending time scanning a large newsgroup would
yield some results, but then we wouldn't have had this encouraging
exchange, would we? It would have saved us all a lot of time.
I was simply amazed to see this thread still ongoing. I was amazed also
to see that some who want to save themselves from aggravation and time
by flaming those who ask innocent questions, even if the questions had
been asked before, spent even *more* time discussing/arguing these moot
points.
More amazing than anything is the attempt to police the internet. Even
government is having a hard time with that, and, if they succeeded, we'd
all be crying foul. Perhaps it's best to let some things go.
08-12-2005 | 06:37 PM
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Maintenace Required Light
Seth wrote:
> "RM" <rm@blah.blah> wrote in message
> news:Q8fKe.34299$Di2.6056@fe02.news.easynews.com.. .
>
>>
>> "Seth" <seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:XGTJe.3601$cg.2037@news02.roc.ny...
>>
>>> "Paul" <me@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
>>> >
>>> > Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all
>>
>> the
>>
>>> > know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say >
>>> except
>>> > to
>>> > answer the question.
>>>
>>> Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually
>>> the
>>> more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious
>>> problem
>>
>> in
>>
>>> the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your
>>
>> FIRST
>>
>>> line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the
>>
>> previously
>>
>>> covered topics, then if not found ask.
>>>
>>> Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
>>> here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
>>>
>> Assuming that the poster has an owners manual.
>
>
> That still leaves scanning to see if the question has already been asked
> and answered. That is obviously available if they found this group to
> post in.
>
I appreciate the courtesy of the individuals who did answer this
question for me. It was very kind.
You're right, of course. Spending time scanning a large newsgroup would
yield some results, but then we wouldn't have had this encouraging
exchange, would we? It would have saved us all a lot of time.
I was simply amazed to see this thread still ongoing. I was amazed also
to see that some who want to save themselves from aggravation and time
by flaming those who ask innocent questions, even if the questions had
been asked before, spent even *more* time discussing/arguing these moot
points.
More amazing than anything is the attempt to police the internet. Even
government is having a hard time with that, and, if they succeeded, we'd
all be crying foul. Perhaps it's best to let some things go.
> "RM" <rm@blah.blah> wrote in message
> news:Q8fKe.34299$Di2.6056@fe02.news.easynews.com.. .
>
>>
>> "Seth" <seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:XGTJe.3601$cg.2037@news02.roc.ny...
>>
>>> "Paul" <me@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:CgtJe.25927$Kx6.18790@fe12.lga...
>>> >
>>> > Thanks to everyone who has helped me with this answer, and not to all
>>
>> the
>>
>>> > know-it-alls out there with the wise cracks who have a lot to say >
>>> except
>>> > to
>>> > answer the question.
>>>
>>> Funny thing is, the "know-it-alls" with the "wise cracks" are usually
>>> the
>>> more knowledgeable people who may now not help you with a serious
>>> problem
>>
>> in
>>
>>> the future. Polite or not, they are trying to guide you towards your
>>
>> FIRST
>>
>>> line of defense, the owners manual. SECOND line is reviewing the
>>
>> previously
>>
>>> covered topics, then if not found ask.
>>>
>>> Now, they may have added you to their kill filters, so next time you're
>>> here, up a creek with a serious problem, they will ignore you.
>>>
>> Assuming that the poster has an owners manual.
>
>
> That still leaves scanning to see if the question has already been asked
> and answered. That is obviously available if they found this group to
> post in.
>
I appreciate the courtesy of the individuals who did answer this
question for me. It was very kind.
You're right, of course. Spending time scanning a large newsgroup would
yield some results, but then we wouldn't have had this encouraging
exchange, would we? It would have saved us all a lot of time.
I was simply amazed to see this thread still ongoing. I was amazed also
to see that some who want to save themselves from aggravation and time
by flaming those who ask innocent questions, even if the questions had
been asked before, spent even *more* time discussing/arguing these moot
points.
More amazing than anything is the attempt to police the internet. Even
government is having a hard time with that, and, if they succeeded, we'd
all be crying foul. Perhaps it's best to let some things go.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
imported_nigel
Other Honda Models
1
11-16-2007 05:40 AM
parkie
Other Honda Models
1
10-20-2007 08:08 PM
blazergirl1128
Honda Accord
2
09-07-2007 11:56 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)