LX EX SE
05-01-2007 | 05:37 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LX EX SE
"jamie" <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in message
news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2@authen.puce.readfre enews.net...
> Hello
>
> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
> lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?
>
> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.
>
> Thank you
Are we talking about options or standard features? Assuming you mean
standard features (even though you said options), I think it depends on the
model and the year. For example, in 2000, the order in the case of the
Accord (fewest features to most) is LX - SE - EX. But that's a little
misleading, since the SE that year (I own one) was essentially an LX with a
discounted option package that included air conditioning, some interior
trim, and a few other things. And then there was the DX, at the bottom of
the line.
My understanding is that in at least some other years, the SE was the top of
the line in terms of features. Maybe someone else can tell you for sure; the
2000 is the only Accord I've owned.
Not sure about other car models (Civic, etc.). I know there have been LX and
EX versions of the Civic, but I don't recall ever seeing a Civic SE.
Paul
05-01-2007 | 05:37 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LX EX SE
"jamie" <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in message
news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2@authen.puce.readfre enews.net...
> Hello
>
> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
> lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?
>
> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.
>
> Thank you
Are we talking about options or standard features? Assuming you mean
standard features (even though you said options), I think it depends on the
model and the year. For example, in 2000, the order in the case of the
Accord (fewest features to most) is LX - SE - EX. But that's a little
misleading, since the SE that year (I own one) was essentially an LX with a
discounted option package that included air conditioning, some interior
trim, and a few other things. And then there was the DX, at the bottom of
the line.
My understanding is that in at least some other years, the SE was the top of
the line in terms of features. Maybe someone else can tell you for sure; the
2000 is the only Accord I've owned.
Not sure about other car models (Civic, etc.). I know there have been LX and
EX versions of the Civic, but I don't recall ever seeing a Civic SE.
Paul
05-01-2007 | 06:32 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LX EX SE
"Paul" <pkmueller@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:8uOZh.4711$uJ6.885@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net :
>
> "jamie" <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in message
> news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2@authen.puce.readfre enews.net...
>> Hello
>>
>> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is
>> second and lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?
>>
>> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.
>>
>> Thank you
>
> Are we talking about options or standard features? Assuming
> you mean standard features (even though you said options), I
> think it depends on the model and the year. For example, in
> 2000, the order in the case of the Accord (fewest features to
> most) is LX - SE - EX. But that's a little misleading, since
> the SE that year (I own one) was essentially an LX with a
> discounted option package that included air conditioning, some
> interior trim, and a few other things. And then there was the
> DX, at the bottom of the line.
>
> My understanding is that in at least some other years, the SE
> was the top of the line in terms of features. Maybe someone
> else can tell you for sure; the 2000 is the only Accord I've
> owned.
>
> Not sure about other car models (Civic, etc.). I know there
> have been LX and EX versions of the Civic, but I don't recall
> ever seeing a Civic SE.
>
> Paul
Great. Thanks so much for the information!
news:8uOZh.4711$uJ6.885@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net :
>
> "jamie" <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in message
> news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2@authen.puce.readfre enews.net...
>> Hello
>>
>> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is
>> second and lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?
>>
>> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.
>>
>> Thank you
>
> Are we talking about options or standard features? Assuming
> you mean standard features (even though you said options), I
> think it depends on the model and the year. For example, in
> 2000, the order in the case of the Accord (fewest features to
> most) is LX - SE - EX. But that's a little misleading, since
> the SE that year (I own one) was essentially an LX with a
> discounted option package that included air conditioning, some
> interior trim, and a few other things. And then there was the
> DX, at the bottom of the line.
>
> My understanding is that in at least some other years, the SE
> was the top of the line in terms of features. Maybe someone
> else can tell you for sure; the 2000 is the only Accord I've
> owned.
>
> Not sure about other car models (Civic, etc.). I know there
> have been LX and EX versions of the Civic, but I don't recall
> ever seeing a Civic SE.
>
> Paul
Great. Thanks so much for the information!
05-01-2007 | 06:32 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LX EX SE
"Paul" <pkmueller@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:8uOZh.4711$uJ6.885@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net :
>
> "jamie" <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in message
> news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2@authen.puce.readfre enews.net...
>> Hello
>>
>> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is
>> second and lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?
>>
>> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.
>>
>> Thank you
>
> Are we talking about options or standard features? Assuming
> you mean standard features (even though you said options), I
> think it depends on the model and the year. For example, in
> 2000, the order in the case of the Accord (fewest features to
> most) is LX - SE - EX. But that's a little misleading, since
> the SE that year (I own one) was essentially an LX with a
> discounted option package that included air conditioning, some
> interior trim, and a few other things. And then there was the
> DX, at the bottom of the line.
>
> My understanding is that in at least some other years, the SE
> was the top of the line in terms of features. Maybe someone
> else can tell you for sure; the 2000 is the only Accord I've
> owned.
>
> Not sure about other car models (Civic, etc.). I know there
> have been LX and EX versions of the Civic, but I don't recall
> ever seeing a Civic SE.
>
> Paul
Great. Thanks so much for the information!
news:8uOZh.4711$uJ6.885@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net :
>
> "jamie" <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in message
> news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2@authen.puce.readfre enews.net...
>> Hello
>>
>> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is
>> second and lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?
>>
>> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.
>>
>> Thank you
>
> Are we talking about options or standard features? Assuming
> you mean standard features (even though you said options), I
> think it depends on the model and the year. For example, in
> 2000, the order in the case of the Accord (fewest features to
> most) is LX - SE - EX. But that's a little misleading, since
> the SE that year (I own one) was essentially an LX with a
> discounted option package that included air conditioning, some
> interior trim, and a few other things. And then there was the
> DX, at the bottom of the line.
>
> My understanding is that in at least some other years, the SE
> was the top of the line in terms of features. Maybe someone
> else can tell you for sure; the 2000 is the only Accord I've
> owned.
>
> Not sure about other car models (Civic, etc.). I know there
> have been LX and EX versions of the Civic, but I don't recall
> ever seeing a Civic SE.
>
> Paul
Great. Thanks so much for the information!
05-01-2007 | 08:54 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LX EX SE
On Tue, 1 May 2007 16:37:29 -0500, "Paul" <pkmueller@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
>"jamie" <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in message
>news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2@authen.puce.readfr eenews.net...
>> Hello
>>
>> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
>> lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?
>>
>> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.
>>
>> Thank you
>
>Are we talking about options or standard features? Assuming you mean
>standard features (even though you said options), I think it depends on the
>model and the year. For example, in 2000, the order in the case of the
>Accord (fewest features to most) is LX - SE - EX. But that's a little
>misleading, since the SE that year (I own one) was essentially an LX with a
>discounted option package that included air conditioning, some interior
>trim, and a few other things. And then there was the DX, at the bottom of
>the line.
>
>My understanding is that in at least some other years, the SE was the top of
>the line in terms of features. Maybe someone else can tell you for sure; the
>2000 is the only Accord I've owned.
>
>Not sure about other car models (Civic, etc.). I know there have been LX and
>EX versions of the Civic, but I don't recall ever seeing a Civic SE.
What he said.
Used to be a DX model too, below the LX.
Now we have:
http://automobiles.honda.com/models/...e=Accord+Sedan
Starting
MSRP Trim
Level
$18,625
Value Package
$20,125
LX
$20,825
Special Edition
$22,550
EX
$23,350
SE V-6
$25,200
LX V-6
$27,400
EX-L V-6 6MT
$27,400
EX-L V-6
So there's SE, and "Value Package". They no longer put LX/EX/SE
badges on the fender, so they can change the SE offer any time they
want.
J.
wrote:
>"jamie" <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in message
>news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2@authen.puce.readfr eenews.net...
>> Hello
>>
>> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
>> lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?
>>
>> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.
>>
>> Thank you
>
>Are we talking about options or standard features? Assuming you mean
>standard features (even though you said options), I think it depends on the
>model and the year. For example, in 2000, the order in the case of the
>Accord (fewest features to most) is LX - SE - EX. But that's a little
>misleading, since the SE that year (I own one) was essentially an LX with a
>discounted option package that included air conditioning, some interior
>trim, and a few other things. And then there was the DX, at the bottom of
>the line.
>
>My understanding is that in at least some other years, the SE was the top of
>the line in terms of features. Maybe someone else can tell you for sure; the
>2000 is the only Accord I've owned.
>
>Not sure about other car models (Civic, etc.). I know there have been LX and
>EX versions of the Civic, but I don't recall ever seeing a Civic SE.
What he said.
Used to be a DX model too, below the LX.
Now we have:
http://automobiles.honda.com/models/...e=Accord+Sedan
Starting
MSRP Trim
Level
$18,625
Value Package
$20,125
LX
$20,825
Special Edition
$22,550
EX
$23,350
SE V-6
$25,200
LX V-6
$27,400
EX-L V-6 6MT
$27,400
EX-L V-6
So there's SE, and "Value Package". They no longer put LX/EX/SE
badges on the fender, so they can change the SE offer any time they
want.
J.
05-01-2007 | 08:54 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LX EX SE
On Tue, 1 May 2007 16:37:29 -0500, "Paul" <pkmueller@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
>"jamie" <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in message
>news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2@authen.puce.readfr eenews.net...
>> Hello
>>
>> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
>> lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?
>>
>> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.
>>
>> Thank you
>
>Are we talking about options or standard features? Assuming you mean
>standard features (even though you said options), I think it depends on the
>model and the year. For example, in 2000, the order in the case of the
>Accord (fewest features to most) is LX - SE - EX. But that's a little
>misleading, since the SE that year (I own one) was essentially an LX with a
>discounted option package that included air conditioning, some interior
>trim, and a few other things. And then there was the DX, at the bottom of
>the line.
>
>My understanding is that in at least some other years, the SE was the top of
>the line in terms of features. Maybe someone else can tell you for sure; the
>2000 is the only Accord I've owned.
>
>Not sure about other car models (Civic, etc.). I know there have been LX and
>EX versions of the Civic, but I don't recall ever seeing a Civic SE.
What he said.
Used to be a DX model too, below the LX.
Now we have:
http://automobiles.honda.com/models/...e=Accord+Sedan
Starting
MSRP Trim
Level
$18,625
Value Package
$20,125
LX
$20,825
Special Edition
$22,550
EX
$23,350
SE V-6
$25,200
LX V-6
$27,400
EX-L V-6 6MT
$27,400
EX-L V-6
So there's SE, and "Value Package". They no longer put LX/EX/SE
badges on the fender, so they can change the SE offer any time they
want.
J.
wrote:
>"jamie" <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in message
>news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2@authen.puce.readfr eenews.net...
>> Hello
>>
>> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
>> lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?
>>
>> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.
>>
>> Thank you
>
>Are we talking about options or standard features? Assuming you mean
>standard features (even though you said options), I think it depends on the
>model and the year. For example, in 2000, the order in the case of the
>Accord (fewest features to most) is LX - SE - EX. But that's a little
>misleading, since the SE that year (I own one) was essentially an LX with a
>discounted option package that included air conditioning, some interior
>trim, and a few other things. And then there was the DX, at the bottom of
>the line.
>
>My understanding is that in at least some other years, the SE was the top of
>the line in terms of features. Maybe someone else can tell you for sure; the
>2000 is the only Accord I've owned.
>
>Not sure about other car models (Civic, etc.). I know there have been LX and
>EX versions of the Civic, but I don't recall ever seeing a Civic SE.
What he said.
Used to be a DX model too, below the LX.
Now we have:
http://automobiles.honda.com/models/...e=Accord+Sedan
Starting
MSRP Trim
Level
$18,625
Value Package
$20,125
LX
$20,825
Special Edition
$22,550
EX
$23,350
SE V-6
$25,200
LX V-6
$27,400
EX-L V-6 6MT
$27,400
EX-L V-6
So there's SE, and "Value Package". They no longer put LX/EX/SE
badges on the fender, so they can change the SE offer any time they
want.
J.
05-02-2007 | 11:54 AM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LX EX SE
"Paul" <pkmueller@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:8uOZh.4711$uJ6.885@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net ...
>
> "jamie" <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in message
> news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2@authen.puce.readfre enews.net...
>> Hello
>>
>> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
>> lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?
>>
>> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.
>>
>> Thank you
>
> Are we talking about options or standard features? Assuming you mean
> standard features (even though you said options), I think it depends on
> the model and the year. For example, in 2000, the order in the case of the
> Accord (fewest features to most) is LX - SE - EX. But that's a little
> misleading, since the SE that year (I own one) was essentially an LX with
> a discounted option package that included air conditioning, some interior
> trim, and a few other things. And then there was the DX, at the bottom of
> the line.
>
> My understanding is that in at least some other years, the SE was the top
> of the line in terms of features. Maybe someone else can tell you for
> sure; the 2000 is the only Accord I've owned.
>
> Not sure about other car models (Civic, etc.). I know there have been LX
> and EX versions of the Civic, but I don't recall ever seeing a Civic SE.
>
> Paul
One thing I forgot to mention is that, in 2000 at least, some of the SE
models were built in Japan. The SE came in three colors: red, dark green and
bronze. As far as I can tell (based on my shopping experiences in the
Atlanta area), all the red ones were made in Japan and all the green and
bronze ones were made in Ohio. I was never able to find out why, and I have
no idea which other models/years are of Japanese origin. As far as I know,
most if not all Accords now sold in the U.S. are built in this country.
05-02-2007 | 11:54 AM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LX EX SE
"Paul" <pkmueller@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:8uOZh.4711$uJ6.885@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net ...
>
> "jamie" <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in message
> news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2@authen.puce.readfre enews.net...
>> Hello
>>
>> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
>> lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?
>>
>> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.
>>
>> Thank you
>
> Are we talking about options or standard features? Assuming you mean
> standard features (even though you said options), I think it depends on
> the model and the year. For example, in 2000, the order in the case of the
> Accord (fewest features to most) is LX - SE - EX. But that's a little
> misleading, since the SE that year (I own one) was essentially an LX with
> a discounted option package that included air conditioning, some interior
> trim, and a few other things. And then there was the DX, at the bottom of
> the line.
>
> My understanding is that in at least some other years, the SE was the top
> of the line in terms of features. Maybe someone else can tell you for
> sure; the 2000 is the only Accord I've owned.
>
> Not sure about other car models (Civic, etc.). I know there have been LX
> and EX versions of the Civic, but I don't recall ever seeing a Civic SE.
>
> Paul
One thing I forgot to mention is that, in 2000 at least, some of the SE
models were built in Japan. The SE came in three colors: red, dark green and
bronze. As far as I can tell (based on my shopping experiences in the
Atlanta area), all the red ones were made in Japan and all the green and
bronze ones were made in Ohio. I was never able to find out why, and I have
no idea which other models/years are of Japanese origin. As far as I know,
most if not all Accords now sold in the U.S. are built in this country.
05-02-2007 | 05:08 PM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LX EX SE
On Wed, 2 May 2007 10:54:49 -0500, "Paul" <pkmueller@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
>One thing I forgot to mention is that, in 2000 at least, some of the SE
>models were built in Japan. The SE came in three colors: red, dark green and
>bronze. As far as I can tell (based on my shopping experiences in the
>Atlanta area), all the red ones were made in Japan and all the green and
>bronze ones were made in Ohio. I was never able to find out why, and I have
>no idea which other models/years are of Japanese origin. As far as I know,
>most if not all Accords now sold in the U.S. are built in this country.
No.
I think it's possible all or most of the V6's are made in the US, but
I believe last year the I4's were made in Japan, at least those
available on the west coast - at least mine!
J.
wrote:
>One thing I forgot to mention is that, in 2000 at least, some of the SE
>models were built in Japan. The SE came in three colors: red, dark green and
>bronze. As far as I can tell (based on my shopping experiences in the
>Atlanta area), all the red ones were made in Japan and all the green and
>bronze ones were made in Ohio. I was never able to find out why, and I have
>no idea which other models/years are of Japanese origin. As far as I know,
>most if not all Accords now sold in the U.S. are built in this country.
No.
I think it's possible all or most of the V6's are made in the US, but
I believe last year the I4's were made in Japan, at least those
available on the west coast - at least mine!
J.
05-02-2007 | 05:08 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LX EX SE
On Wed, 2 May 2007 10:54:49 -0500, "Paul" <pkmueller@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
>One thing I forgot to mention is that, in 2000 at least, some of the SE
>models were built in Japan. The SE came in three colors: red, dark green and
>bronze. As far as I can tell (based on my shopping experiences in the
>Atlanta area), all the red ones were made in Japan and all the green and
>bronze ones were made in Ohio. I was never able to find out why, and I have
>no idea which other models/years are of Japanese origin. As far as I know,
>most if not all Accords now sold in the U.S. are built in this country.
No.
I think it's possible all or most of the V6's are made in the US, but
I believe last year the I4's were made in Japan, at least those
available on the west coast - at least mine!
J.
wrote:
>One thing I forgot to mention is that, in 2000 at least, some of the SE
>models were built in Japan. The SE came in three colors: red, dark green and
>bronze. As far as I can tell (based on my shopping experiences in the
>Atlanta area), all the red ones were made in Japan and all the green and
>bronze ones were made in Ohio. I was never able to find out why, and I have
>no idea which other models/years are of Japanese origin. As far as I know,
>most if not all Accords now sold in the U.S. are built in this country.
No.
I think it's possible all or most of the V6's are made in the US, but
I believe last year the I4's were made in Japan, at least those
available on the west coast - at least mine!
J.
05-02-2007 | 05:55 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LX EX SE
"JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
news:qdvh3312dt4bsv9r4dcstqan1nj0q5jgtv@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 2 May 2007 10:54:49 -0500, "Paul" <pkmueller@sbcglobal.net>
> wrote:
>
>>One thing I forgot to mention is that, in 2000 at least, some of the SE
>>models were built in Japan. The SE came in three colors: red, dark green
>>and
>>bronze. As far as I can tell (based on my shopping experiences in the
>>Atlanta area), all the red ones were made in Japan and all the green and
>>bronze ones were made in Ohio. I was never able to find out why, and I
>>have
>>no idea which other models/years are of Japanese origin. As far as I know,
>>most if not all Accords now sold in the U.S. are built in this country.
>
> No.
>
> I think it's possible all or most of the V6's are made in the US, but
> I believe last year the I4's were made in Japan, at least those
> available on the west coast - at least mine!
>
> J.
According to a Honda fact sheet available online, all Accord coupes are made
in North America. That would include four-cylinder models. The same fact
sheet says some Accord sedans are made in Marysville, Ohio. And another
Honda site says the Honda engine plant in Anna, Ohio, makes four-cylinder
engines for Accords, among other models. All of which leads me to believe
that at least some four-cylinder Accords are still being made in the U.S.
It's possible some are being imported from Japan, especially to the west
coast. That might make sense, depending on transportation costs and other
factors.
Not that any of this particularly matters.
05-02-2007 | 05:55 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LX EX SE
"JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
news:qdvh3312dt4bsv9r4dcstqan1nj0q5jgtv@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 2 May 2007 10:54:49 -0500, "Paul" <pkmueller@sbcglobal.net>
> wrote:
>
>>One thing I forgot to mention is that, in 2000 at least, some of the SE
>>models were built in Japan. The SE came in three colors: red, dark green
>>and
>>bronze. As far as I can tell (based on my shopping experiences in the
>>Atlanta area), all the red ones were made in Japan and all the green and
>>bronze ones were made in Ohio. I was never able to find out why, and I
>>have
>>no idea which other models/years are of Japanese origin. As far as I know,
>>most if not all Accords now sold in the U.S. are built in this country.
>
> No.
>
> I think it's possible all or most of the V6's are made in the US, but
> I believe last year the I4's were made in Japan, at least those
> available on the west coast - at least mine!
>
> J.
According to a Honda fact sheet available online, all Accord coupes are made
in North America. That would include four-cylinder models. The same fact
sheet says some Accord sedans are made in Marysville, Ohio. And another
Honda site says the Honda engine plant in Anna, Ohio, makes four-cylinder
engines for Accords, among other models. All of which leads me to believe
that at least some four-cylinder Accords are still being made in the U.S.
It's possible some are being imported from Japan, especially to the west
coast. That might make sense, depending on transportation costs and other
factors.
Not that any of this particularly matters.
05-13-2007 | 01:44 AM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LX EX SE
jamie <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2
@authen.puce.readfreenews.net:
> Hello
>
> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
> lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?
>
> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.
>
> Thank you
Which model?
For Accords, it's LX SE EX generally
For CR-V's LX EX SE
@authen.puce.readfreenews.net:
> Hello
>
> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
> lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?
>
> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.
>
> Thank you
Which model?
For Accords, it's LX SE EX generally
For CR-V's LX EX SE
05-13-2007 | 01:44 AM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LX EX SE
jamie <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2
@authen.puce.readfreenews.net:
> Hello
>
> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
> lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?
>
> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.
>
> Thank you
Which model?
For Accords, it's LX SE EX generally
For CR-V's LX EX SE
@authen.puce.readfreenews.net:
> Hello
>
> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and
> lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE?
>
> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models.
>
> Thank you
Which model?
For Accords, it's LX SE EX generally
For CR-V's LX EX SE