Honda Civic 1993 Should I replace or not ?
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Honda Civic 1993 Should I replace or not ?
Hi,
I have 1993 Civic and I payed $1700 CAN ( $US 1500 ) in repairs last
year ( electrical, exhaust etc). Wandering if it is better
to buy new $20,000 car - average cost per year is $2000 on 10 years -
pretty much the same as maintaining the old one.
Any experiences with how frequently 1993 continue to break down once
they start havinig problems ?
Any thoughts on Honda Fit in Canada ? Is it coming any time soon ?
Will they have 1.6 liter engine ?
Regards, Ranko
I have 1993 Civic and I payed $1700 CAN ( $US 1500 ) in repairs last
year ( electrical, exhaust etc). Wandering if it is better
to buy new $20,000 car - average cost per year is $2000 on 10 years -
pretty much the same as maintaining the old one.
Any experiences with how frequently 1993 continue to break down once
they start havinig problems ?
Any thoughts on Honda Fit in Canada ? Is it coming any time soon ?
Will they have 1.6 liter engine ?
Regards, Ranko
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda Civic 1993 Should I replace or not ?
How many miles do you have on this car?
What did you have done to it last year?
Is it an auto or manual transmission?
How rusted does the body appear to be? (Too much rust in certain places will
preclude emergency jacking after a flat tire suddenly occurs.)
Have you followed the owners' manual maintenance schedule, particularly for
fluids (engine oil, radiator coolant, transmission oil) and filters (oil
filter, air filter, fuel filter, air filter)?
For Canadian driving, I suspect the most threatening item on your car right
now is rust.
By reports here Honda Civics from the late 1980s often accumulate over 250k
miles (~ 400k km) easily.
Elle
Original owner, 1991 Civic, manual transmission, 171k miles, still getting
over 40 mpg, driven in Northern U.S. for about half its life. Hoping to keep
it another five years. Only major repairs anticipated (besides timing belt
change): Replace camshaft holder O-rings (to be done soon as a DIY job);
overhaul clutch (no signs of needing overhaul as yet). Though arguably I
should do something about certain rubber suspension bushings.
<Ranko.Mosic@gmail.com> wrote
> Hi,
> I have 1993 Civic and I payed $1700 CAN ( $US 1500 ) in repairs last
> year ( electrical, exhaust etc). Wandering if it is better
> to buy new $20,000 car - average cost per year is $2000 on 10 years -
> pretty much the same as maintaining the old one.
> Any experiences with how frequently 1993 continue to break down once
> they start havinig problems ?
> Any thoughts on Honda Fit in Canada ? Is it coming any time soon ?
> Will they have 1.6 liter engine ?
>
> Regards, Ranko
>
What did you have done to it last year?
Is it an auto or manual transmission?
How rusted does the body appear to be? (Too much rust in certain places will
preclude emergency jacking after a flat tire suddenly occurs.)
Have you followed the owners' manual maintenance schedule, particularly for
fluids (engine oil, radiator coolant, transmission oil) and filters (oil
filter, air filter, fuel filter, air filter)?
For Canadian driving, I suspect the most threatening item on your car right
now is rust.
By reports here Honda Civics from the late 1980s often accumulate over 250k
miles (~ 400k km) easily.
Elle
Original owner, 1991 Civic, manual transmission, 171k miles, still getting
over 40 mpg, driven in Northern U.S. for about half its life. Hoping to keep
it another five years. Only major repairs anticipated (besides timing belt
change): Replace camshaft holder O-rings (to be done soon as a DIY job);
overhaul clutch (no signs of needing overhaul as yet). Though arguably I
should do something about certain rubber suspension bushings.
<Ranko.Mosic@gmail.com> wrote
> Hi,
> I have 1993 Civic and I payed $1700 CAN ( $US 1500 ) in repairs last
> year ( electrical, exhaust etc). Wandering if it is better
> to buy new $20,000 car - average cost per year is $2000 on 10 years -
> pretty much the same as maintaining the old one.
> Any experiences with how frequently 1993 continue to break down once
> they start havinig problems ?
> Any thoughts on Honda Fit in Canada ? Is it coming any time soon ?
> Will they have 1.6 liter engine ?
>
> Regards, Ranko
>
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda Civic 1993 Should I replace or not ?
Ranko.Mosic@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
> I have 1993 Civic and I payed $1700 CAN ( $US 1500 ) in repairs last
> year ( electrical, exhaust etc). Wandering if it is better
> to buy new $20,000 car - average cost per year is $2000 on 10 years -
> pretty much the same as maintaining the old one.
> Any experiences with how frequently 1993 continue to break down once
> they start havinig problems ?
> Any thoughts on Honda Fit in Canada ? Is it coming any time soon ?
> Will they have 1.6 liter engine ?
>
> Regards, Ranko
Just because you paid $1700 last year doesn't necessarily mean you'll pay
that much every year. How many Km's does it have?
I have spent a grand total of just $700 (CDN) over the past 2 years for my
'93 Accord, which currently has 224,000km (~ 139,000 miles).
As for the Fit/Jazz, Honda is supposed to bring one or the other to North
America next year I think. Dunno about Canada, although I would tend to
think that we will get it too.
> Hi,
> I have 1993 Civic and I payed $1700 CAN ( $US 1500 ) in repairs last
> year ( electrical, exhaust etc). Wandering if it is better
> to buy new $20,000 car - average cost per year is $2000 on 10 years -
> pretty much the same as maintaining the old one.
> Any experiences with how frequently 1993 continue to break down once
> they start havinig problems ?
> Any thoughts on Honda Fit in Canada ? Is it coming any time soon ?
> Will they have 1.6 liter engine ?
>
> Regards, Ranko
Just because you paid $1700 last year doesn't necessarily mean you'll pay
that much every year. How many Km's does it have?
I have spent a grand total of just $700 (CDN) over the past 2 years for my
'93 Accord, which currently has 224,000km (~ 139,000 miles).
As for the Fit/Jazz, Honda is supposed to bring one or the other to North
America next year I think. Dunno about Canada, although I would tend to
think that we will get it too.
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda Civic 1993 Should I replace or not ?
I have 120k miles on it.
Last 6 months electrical system failed mostly ( ignitor; then
distributor/rotating arm - can't start without these; replaced muffler
twice in 4 years - Canadian weather, I guess;
radiator was replaced - did not cause any problems but Midas needed
cash flow I guess); at 60k miles regular maintenance - timing belt was
replaced; breaks.
This is manual transmission. It is not too rusty - I see no major
problems.
Oil/filter was done regularly.
Gas consumption is perfect ( 35 mpg).
I know it can run for much longer - I am just thinking if it will cost
me the same to maintaing it as to buy new one.
Last 6 months electrical system failed mostly ( ignitor; then
distributor/rotating arm - can't start without these; replaced muffler
twice in 4 years - Canadian weather, I guess;
radiator was replaced - did not cause any problems but Midas needed
cash flow I guess); at 60k miles regular maintenance - timing belt was
replaced; breaks.
This is manual transmission. It is not too rusty - I see no major
problems.
Oil/filter was done regularly.
Gas consumption is perfect ( 35 mpg).
I know it can run for much longer - I am just thinking if it will cost
me the same to maintaing it as to buy new one.
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda Civic 1993 Should I replace or not ?
I have 120k miles on it.
Last 6 months electrical system failed mostly ( ignitor; then
distributor/rotating arm - can't start without these; replaced muffler
twice in 4 years - Canadian weather, I guess;
radiator was replaced - did not cause any problems but Midas needed
cash flow I guess); at 60k miles regular maintenance - timing belt was
replaced; breaks.
This is manual transmission. It is not too rusty - I see no major
problems.
Oil/filter was done regularly.
Gas consumption is perfect ( 35 mpg).
I know it can run for much longer - I am just thinking if it will cost
me the same to maintaing it as to buy new one.
Last 6 months electrical system failed mostly ( ignitor; then
distributor/rotating arm - can't start without these; replaced muffler
twice in 4 years - Canadian weather, I guess;
radiator was replaced - did not cause any problems but Midas needed
cash flow I guess); at 60k miles regular maintenance - timing belt was
replaced; breaks.
This is manual transmission. It is not too rusty - I see no major
problems.
Oil/filter was done regularly.
Gas consumption is perfect ( 35 mpg).
I know it can run for much longer - I am just thinking if it will cost
me the same to maintaing it as to buy new one.
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda Civic 1993 Should I replace or not ?
The distributor parts are the Achille's heel of early 1990s (and some other)
Hondas. Thankfully, that's the only real weakness of these Hondas. Thus: A
new ignitor will be needed about every five years. Same for the coil. The
rotor set screws have a history of not holding. The bearing goes after a
while. Ultimately, a new housing is a good idea. The housing is the big
expense: Figure one every ten years. Then the distributor's good to go for
some time.
Like you imply and IMO, mufflers are the price of driving in the North. Some
folks here might have some suggestions about whether to go with a place like
Midas, an independent, or a dealer. IIRC, an OEM muffler installed at the
dealer's has been said to be worth it. I just use an independent muffler
shop, though next time, I think I'm going to do it myself. I reckon my 91
Civic is on its fourth muffler. Needed one about every four to six years in
the Northern U.S.
The radiators on early 1990s Civics are almost as notorious as the
distributor. I think they're mostly or all plastic and prone to cracking.
Your new one should last at least five years; maybe ten. (I lucked out: The
guys at a dealership broke my 1991 Civic's in 2002 while messing up a
distributor repair, and, without even telling me in advance, went ahead and
replaced it. Guess that made their failed distributor repair worth it. I
since gained a lot of expertise in distributor part replacement repair and
so do those myself now.)
I would expect the manual transmission to last longer than auto
transmission, based on general reading about transmissions. You may need the
clutch overhauled at some point. (I assume it's the original.) I am figuring
$500 American for that.
I think last year was the big year. Like High Tech Misfit said, the $1500
bill from last year isn't likely to occur year after year.
I also agree with High Tech Misfit about the Fit: It's supposed to arrive in
the U.S. in 2006. I expect it will arrive in Canada about the same time. I
thought it was closer to 1.4L or 1.3L. The net has a fair amount of info on
its specs; google for "Honda Fit."
Given you just put a pile of dough into the Civic, that it has only 120k
miles (that's pretty low for a properly maintained Civic), I'd see it as a
very good investment and wait at least two more years. That way, the Fit may
not be in such high demand, too. (I'm betting it goes on back order and so
may be a tad pricey for its first year or so.) If you still like it after
two years, maybe wait until the next major repair before giving up on it.
Recently ome guy here slapped a cheap-o Autozone distributor into his early
1990s Honda (a Civic, I think) for $200 (it included a new coil and
ignitor). OEM for all that goes for closer to $500. Guy said he'd be happy
if the cheap-o one lasted around a year, which it certainly may. It's
something to consider in the future, depending on your timeframe.
I should have mentioned brake fluid and power steering fluid before, also,
with regular changing of the brake fluid being highly important to keep
moisture from causing rust in the brake system.
<Ranko.Mosic@gmail.com> wrote
> I have 120k miles on it.
> Last 6 months electrical system failed mostly ( ignitor; then
> distributor/rotating arm - can't start without these; replaced muffler
> twice in 4 years - Canadian weather, I guess;
> radiator was replaced - did not cause any problems but Midas needed
> cash flow I guess); at 60k miles regular maintenance - timing belt was
> replaced; breaks.
> This is manual transmission. It is not too rusty - I see no major
> problems.
> Oil/filter was done regularly.
> Gas consumption is perfect ( 35 mpg).
> I know it can run for much longer - I am just thinking if it will cost
> me the same to maintaing it as to buy new one.
>
Hondas. Thankfully, that's the only real weakness of these Hondas. Thus: A
new ignitor will be needed about every five years. Same for the coil. The
rotor set screws have a history of not holding. The bearing goes after a
while. Ultimately, a new housing is a good idea. The housing is the big
expense: Figure one every ten years. Then the distributor's good to go for
some time.
Like you imply and IMO, mufflers are the price of driving in the North. Some
folks here might have some suggestions about whether to go with a place like
Midas, an independent, or a dealer. IIRC, an OEM muffler installed at the
dealer's has been said to be worth it. I just use an independent muffler
shop, though next time, I think I'm going to do it myself. I reckon my 91
Civic is on its fourth muffler. Needed one about every four to six years in
the Northern U.S.
The radiators on early 1990s Civics are almost as notorious as the
distributor. I think they're mostly or all plastic and prone to cracking.
Your new one should last at least five years; maybe ten. (I lucked out: The
guys at a dealership broke my 1991 Civic's in 2002 while messing up a
distributor repair, and, without even telling me in advance, went ahead and
replaced it. Guess that made their failed distributor repair worth it. I
since gained a lot of expertise in distributor part replacement repair and
so do those myself now.)
I would expect the manual transmission to last longer than auto
transmission, based on general reading about transmissions. You may need the
clutch overhauled at some point. (I assume it's the original.) I am figuring
$500 American for that.
I think last year was the big year. Like High Tech Misfit said, the $1500
bill from last year isn't likely to occur year after year.
I also agree with High Tech Misfit about the Fit: It's supposed to arrive in
the U.S. in 2006. I expect it will arrive in Canada about the same time. I
thought it was closer to 1.4L or 1.3L. The net has a fair amount of info on
its specs; google for "Honda Fit."
Given you just put a pile of dough into the Civic, that it has only 120k
miles (that's pretty low for a properly maintained Civic), I'd see it as a
very good investment and wait at least two more years. That way, the Fit may
not be in such high demand, too. (I'm betting it goes on back order and so
may be a tad pricey for its first year or so.) If you still like it after
two years, maybe wait until the next major repair before giving up on it.
Recently ome guy here slapped a cheap-o Autozone distributor into his early
1990s Honda (a Civic, I think) for $200 (it included a new coil and
ignitor). OEM for all that goes for closer to $500. Guy said he'd be happy
if the cheap-o one lasted around a year, which it certainly may. It's
something to consider in the future, depending on your timeframe.
I should have mentioned brake fluid and power steering fluid before, also,
with regular changing of the brake fluid being highly important to keep
moisture from causing rust in the brake system.
<Ranko.Mosic@gmail.com> wrote
> I have 120k miles on it.
> Last 6 months electrical system failed mostly ( ignitor; then
> distributor/rotating arm - can't start without these; replaced muffler
> twice in 4 years - Canadian weather, I guess;
> radiator was replaced - did not cause any problems but Midas needed
> cash flow I guess); at 60k miles regular maintenance - timing belt was
> replaced; breaks.
> This is manual transmission. It is not too rusty - I see no major
> problems.
> Oil/filter was done regularly.
> Gas consumption is perfect ( 35 mpg).
> I know it can run for much longer - I am just thinking if it will cost
> me the same to maintaing it as to buy new one.
>
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda Civic 1993 Should I replace or not ?
The distributor parts are the Achille's heel of early 1990s (and some other)
Hondas. Thankfully, that's the only real weakness of these Hondas. Thus: A
new ignitor will be needed about every five years. Same for the coil. The
rotor set screws have a history of not holding. The bearing goes after a
while. Ultimately, a new housing is a good idea. The housing is the big
expense: Figure one every ten years. Then the distributor's good to go for
some time.
Like you imply and IMO, mufflers are the price of driving in the North. Some
folks here might have some suggestions about whether to go with a place like
Midas, an independent, or a dealer. IIRC, an OEM muffler installed at the
dealer's has been said to be worth it. I just use an independent muffler
shop, though next time, I think I'm going to do it myself. I reckon my 91
Civic is on its fourth muffler. Needed one about every four to six years in
the Northern U.S.
The radiators on early 1990s Civics are almost as notorious as the
distributor. I think they're mostly or all plastic and prone to cracking.
Your new one should last at least five years; maybe ten. (I lucked out: The
guys at a dealership broke my 1991 Civic's in 2002 while messing up a
distributor repair, and, without even telling me in advance, went ahead and
replaced it. Guess that made their failed distributor repair worth it. I
since gained a lot of expertise in distributor part replacement repair and
so do those myself now.)
I would expect the manual transmission to last longer than auto
transmission, based on general reading about transmissions. You may need the
clutch overhauled at some point. (I assume it's the original.) I am figuring
$500 American for that.
I think last year was the big year. Like High Tech Misfit said, the $1500
bill from last year isn't likely to occur year after year.
I also agree with High Tech Misfit about the Fit: It's supposed to arrive in
the U.S. in 2006. I expect it will arrive in Canada about the same time. I
thought it was closer to 1.4L or 1.3L. The net has a fair amount of info on
its specs; google for "Honda Fit."
Given you just put a pile of dough into the Civic, that it has only 120k
miles (that's pretty low for a properly maintained Civic), I'd see it as a
very good investment and wait at least two more years. That way, the Fit may
not be in such high demand, too. (I'm betting it goes on back order and so
may be a tad pricey for its first year or so.) If you still like it after
two years, maybe wait until the next major repair before giving up on it.
Recently ome guy here slapped a cheap-o Autozone distributor into his early
1990s Honda (a Civic, I think) for $200 (it included a new coil and
ignitor). OEM for all that goes for closer to $500. Guy said he'd be happy
if the cheap-o one lasted around a year, which it certainly may. It's
something to consider in the future, depending on your timeframe.
I should have mentioned brake fluid and power steering fluid before, also,
with regular changing of the brake fluid being highly important to keep
moisture from causing rust in the brake system.
<Ranko.Mosic@gmail.com> wrote
> I have 120k miles on it.
> Last 6 months electrical system failed mostly ( ignitor; then
> distributor/rotating arm - can't start without these; replaced muffler
> twice in 4 years - Canadian weather, I guess;
> radiator was replaced - did not cause any problems but Midas needed
> cash flow I guess); at 60k miles regular maintenance - timing belt was
> replaced; breaks.
> This is manual transmission. It is not too rusty - I see no major
> problems.
> Oil/filter was done regularly.
> Gas consumption is perfect ( 35 mpg).
> I know it can run for much longer - I am just thinking if it will cost
> me the same to maintaing it as to buy new one.
>
Hondas. Thankfully, that's the only real weakness of these Hondas. Thus: A
new ignitor will be needed about every five years. Same for the coil. The
rotor set screws have a history of not holding. The bearing goes after a
while. Ultimately, a new housing is a good idea. The housing is the big
expense: Figure one every ten years. Then the distributor's good to go for
some time.
Like you imply and IMO, mufflers are the price of driving in the North. Some
folks here might have some suggestions about whether to go with a place like
Midas, an independent, or a dealer. IIRC, an OEM muffler installed at the
dealer's has been said to be worth it. I just use an independent muffler
shop, though next time, I think I'm going to do it myself. I reckon my 91
Civic is on its fourth muffler. Needed one about every four to six years in
the Northern U.S.
The radiators on early 1990s Civics are almost as notorious as the
distributor. I think they're mostly or all plastic and prone to cracking.
Your new one should last at least five years; maybe ten. (I lucked out: The
guys at a dealership broke my 1991 Civic's in 2002 while messing up a
distributor repair, and, without even telling me in advance, went ahead and
replaced it. Guess that made their failed distributor repair worth it. I
since gained a lot of expertise in distributor part replacement repair and
so do those myself now.)
I would expect the manual transmission to last longer than auto
transmission, based on general reading about transmissions. You may need the
clutch overhauled at some point. (I assume it's the original.) I am figuring
$500 American for that.
I think last year was the big year. Like High Tech Misfit said, the $1500
bill from last year isn't likely to occur year after year.
I also agree with High Tech Misfit about the Fit: It's supposed to arrive in
the U.S. in 2006. I expect it will arrive in Canada about the same time. I
thought it was closer to 1.4L or 1.3L. The net has a fair amount of info on
its specs; google for "Honda Fit."
Given you just put a pile of dough into the Civic, that it has only 120k
miles (that's pretty low for a properly maintained Civic), I'd see it as a
very good investment and wait at least two more years. That way, the Fit may
not be in such high demand, too. (I'm betting it goes on back order and so
may be a tad pricey for its first year or so.) If you still like it after
two years, maybe wait until the next major repair before giving up on it.
Recently ome guy here slapped a cheap-o Autozone distributor into his early
1990s Honda (a Civic, I think) for $200 (it included a new coil and
ignitor). OEM for all that goes for closer to $500. Guy said he'd be happy
if the cheap-o one lasted around a year, which it certainly may. It's
something to consider in the future, depending on your timeframe.
I should have mentioned brake fluid and power steering fluid before, also,
with regular changing of the brake fluid being highly important to keep
moisture from causing rust in the brake system.
<Ranko.Mosic@gmail.com> wrote
> I have 120k miles on it.
> Last 6 months electrical system failed mostly ( ignitor; then
> distributor/rotating arm - can't start without these; replaced muffler
> twice in 4 years - Canadian weather, I guess;
> radiator was replaced - did not cause any problems but Midas needed
> cash flow I guess); at 60k miles regular maintenance - timing belt was
> replaced; breaks.
> This is manual transmission. It is not too rusty - I see no major
> problems.
> Oil/filter was done regularly.
> Gas consumption is perfect ( 35 mpg).
> I know it can run for much longer - I am just thinking if it will cost
> me the same to maintaing it as to buy new one.
>
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda Civic 1993 Should I replace or not ?
Ranko.Mosic@gmail.com wrote:
> I have 120k miles on it.
> Last 6 months electrical system failed mostly ( ignitor; then
> distributor/rotating arm - can't start without these; replaced muffler
> twice in 4 years - Canadian weather, I guess;
> radiator was replaced - did not cause any problems but Midas needed
> cash flow I guess); at 60k miles regular maintenance - timing belt was
> replaced; breaks.
Avoid Midas at all costs. I suggest a reputable private mechanic who
specializes in Japanese cars and uses OEM parts. Labour rates will
obviously be lower than at the dealer and even Midas.
> This is manual transmission. It is not too rusty - I see no major
> problems.
> Oil/filter was done regularly.
> Gas consumption is perfect ( 35 mpg).
> I know it can run for much longer - I am just thinking if it will cost
> me the same to maintaing it as to buy new one.
Also keep in mind that if you buy a new car, you will pay more for insurance
because it's new.
> I have 120k miles on it.
> Last 6 months electrical system failed mostly ( ignitor; then
> distributor/rotating arm - can't start without these; replaced muffler
> twice in 4 years - Canadian weather, I guess;
> radiator was replaced - did not cause any problems but Midas needed
> cash flow I guess); at 60k miles regular maintenance - timing belt was
> replaced; breaks.
Avoid Midas at all costs. I suggest a reputable private mechanic who
specializes in Japanese cars and uses OEM parts. Labour rates will
obviously be lower than at the dealer and even Midas.
> This is manual transmission. It is not too rusty - I see no major
> problems.
> Oil/filter was done regularly.
> Gas consumption is perfect ( 35 mpg).
> I know it can run for much longer - I am just thinking if it will cost
> me the same to maintaing it as to buy new one.
Also keep in mind that if you buy a new car, you will pay more for insurance
because it's new.
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda Civic 1993 Should I replace or not ?
Yes, original muffler lasted 10 years. Then came Midas "warrantied"
muffler that lasted only 2 years, and I couldn't find their receipt
once it went bust. I am on third independent muffler now. Original
parts sweem to be twice as expensive, but as you say, may be worth it.
Clutch is original, and producing some squeeking noise for years now, I
guess it is wire from clutch pedal to the clutch itself.
When they replaced distributor and spark plugs at dealership ( $200 CAN
~ $US 160) they also wanted to replace ignitor, cables etc etc for
total of $US 1000. I declined and said just make it start. Tha't what
got me to think I should replace it.
Re: Honda Fit: looks okay, but may be to small for winds & snow here (
Toronto ).
I would prefer something well over 1 ton. There might be 1.5 Fit
..http://asia.vtec.net/Reviews/JazzVtec/
Too bad Honda isn't making any bigger hatchbacks ( my Civic is sedan,
but I want hatchback next). Looked at Acura hatchback ( RSX ), very
nice, but pricey ( $34k CAN).
muffler that lasted only 2 years, and I couldn't find their receipt
once it went bust. I am on third independent muffler now. Original
parts sweem to be twice as expensive, but as you say, may be worth it.
Clutch is original, and producing some squeeking noise for years now, I
guess it is wire from clutch pedal to the clutch itself.
When they replaced distributor and spark plugs at dealership ( $200 CAN
~ $US 160) they also wanted to replace ignitor, cables etc etc for
total of $US 1000. I declined and said just make it start. Tha't what
got me to think I should replace it.
Re: Honda Fit: looks okay, but may be to small for winds & snow here (
Toronto ).
I would prefer something well over 1 ton. There might be 1.5 Fit
..http://asia.vtec.net/Reviews/JazzVtec/
Too bad Honda isn't making any bigger hatchbacks ( my Civic is sedan,
but I want hatchback next). Looked at Acura hatchback ( RSX ), very
nice, but pricey ( $34k CAN).
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda Civic 1993 Should I replace or not ?
Yes, Midas is not going to happen again. Have to find good Japanese car
mechanic.
And yes, I thought about insurance costs for new car. That will be a
killer for sure.
Even now I am paying $1600 CAN per year. It is ridiculous.
mechanic.
And yes, I thought about insurance costs for new car. That will be a
killer for sure.
Even now I am paying $1600 CAN per year. It is ridiculous.
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda Civic 1993 Should I replace or not ?
<Ranko.Mosic@gmail.com> wrote
> Yes, original muffler lasted 10 years. Then came Midas "warrantied"
> muffler that lasted only 2 years, and I couldn't find their receipt
> once it went bust. I am on third independent muffler now. Original
> parts sweem to be twice as expensive, but as you say, may be worth it.
> Clutch is original, and producing some squeeking noise for years now, I
> guess it is wire from clutch pedal to the clutch itself.
> When they replaced distributor and spark plugs at dealership ( $200 CAN
> ~ $US 160) they also wanted to replace ignitor, cables etc etc for
> total of $US 1000. I declined and said just make it start. Tha't what
> got me to think I should replace it.
So I gather from your other posts you did replace the ignitor. If this is
only your second (or even third) ignitor, this was not wasted money, from my
reading here and my experience.
Plug wires (cables above?) are supposed to be replaced every 4 years, 60k
miles for my 1991 Civic, according to its maintenance schedule. If you're at
all handy, you could do these yourself. But definitely go OEM for these.
Lots of warnings on the net about not going OEM. Yes, costs a lot more. Good
plug wires are very important to good firing of the engine, if you will. It
wouldn't surprise me if bad wires (meaning in particular very high
resistance) could also adversely affect distributor parts and perhaps put
more load on the alternator than is normal.
Shoulda mentioned the alternator before. Give it around seven to ten years,
though some folks here talk about rebuilding it on one's own being much
cheaper.
Battery is good for 4-7 years. Don't wait for it to die completely. This too
puts more load on the alternator and may shorten the alternator's life.
> Re: Honda Fit: looks okay, but may be to small for winds & snow here (
> Toronto ).
Oh yes. Very tiny. Low power. But something like 50 mpg... :-)
> I would prefer something well over 1 ton. There might be 1.5 Fit
> .http://asia.vtec.net/Reviews/JazzVtec/
> Too bad Honda isn't making any bigger hatchbacks ( my Civic is sedan,
> but I want hatchback next). Looked at Acura hatchback ( RSX ), very
> nice, but pricey ( $34k CAN).
> Yes, original muffler lasted 10 years. Then came Midas "warrantied"
> muffler that lasted only 2 years, and I couldn't find their receipt
> once it went bust. I am on third independent muffler now. Original
> parts sweem to be twice as expensive, but as you say, may be worth it.
> Clutch is original, and producing some squeeking noise for years now, I
> guess it is wire from clutch pedal to the clutch itself.
> When they replaced distributor and spark plugs at dealership ( $200 CAN
> ~ $US 160) they also wanted to replace ignitor, cables etc etc for
> total of $US 1000. I declined and said just make it start. Tha't what
> got me to think I should replace it.
So I gather from your other posts you did replace the ignitor. If this is
only your second (or even third) ignitor, this was not wasted money, from my
reading here and my experience.
Plug wires (cables above?) are supposed to be replaced every 4 years, 60k
miles for my 1991 Civic, according to its maintenance schedule. If you're at
all handy, you could do these yourself. But definitely go OEM for these.
Lots of warnings on the net about not going OEM. Yes, costs a lot more. Good
plug wires are very important to good firing of the engine, if you will. It
wouldn't surprise me if bad wires (meaning in particular very high
resistance) could also adversely affect distributor parts and perhaps put
more load on the alternator than is normal.
Shoulda mentioned the alternator before. Give it around seven to ten years,
though some folks here talk about rebuilding it on one's own being much
cheaper.
Battery is good for 4-7 years. Don't wait for it to die completely. This too
puts more load on the alternator and may shorten the alternator's life.
> Re: Honda Fit: looks okay, but may be to small for winds & snow here (
> Toronto ).
Oh yes. Very tiny. Low power. But something like 50 mpg... :-)
> I would prefer something well over 1 ton. There might be 1.5 Fit
> .http://asia.vtec.net/Reviews/JazzVtec/
> Too bad Honda isn't making any bigger hatchbacks ( my Civic is sedan,
> but I want hatchback next). Looked at Acura hatchback ( RSX ), very
> nice, but pricey ( $34k CAN).
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda Civic 1993 Should I replace or not ?
Ignitor was replaced once - not OEM, it was emergency
first-mechanic-sighted replacement. How do I know if mechanic will be
using OEM parts or not anyways?
Battery was replaced once after it died on me one winter ( -32 C).
Still original alternator.
Plug wires were never replaced. It is just that I never know what&when
is going to break,
and if it could be dangerous ( sudden engine stop on highway middle
lane ).
first-mechanic-sighted replacement. How do I know if mechanic will be
using OEM parts or not anyways?
Battery was replaced once after it died on me one winter ( -32 C).
Still original alternator.
Plug wires were never replaced. It is just that I never know what&when
is going to break,
and if it could be dangerous ( sudden engine stop on highway middle
lane ).
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda Civic 1993 Should I replace or not ?
The garage I use will do a used vehicle inspection report. They inspect
the vehicle from end-to-end, and then prepare a report of what is likely
to be replaced when, and at what cost. While it is no guarantee, it is
very good information that can help you make an informed decision.
In general, you get the lowest cost when you drive a vehicle until
it has to be towed to the wrecker. However, if you need reliability,
then a new or newer vehicle may be a better bet.
Dan
(This account is not used for email.)
"Ranko.Mosic@gmail.com" (Ranko.Mosic@gmail.com) writes:
> Hi,
> I have 1993 Civic and I payed $1700 CAN ( $US 1500 ) in repairs last
> year ( electrical, exhaust etc). Wandering if it is better
> to buy new $20,000 car - average cost per year is $2000 on 10 years -
> pretty much the same as maintaining the old one.
> Any experiences with how frequently 1993 continue to break down once
> they start havinig problems ?
> Any thoughts on Honda Fit in Canada ? Is it coming any time soon ?
> Will they have 1.6 liter engine ?
>
> Regards, Ranko
>
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda Civic 1993 Should I replace or not ?
<Ranko.Mosic@gmail.com> wrote
> Ignitor was replaced once - not OEM, it was emergency
> first-mechanic-sighted replacement. How do I know if mechanic will be
> using OEM parts or not anyways?
Short of taking it out and reporting the marks on it, I think one can only
ask the (independent?) mechanic. Call him up. They get questions like this a
lot. If he's not sure if it's OEM, ask from whom he buys them; report back
here. The marks will tell a person whether it is OEM or not. (Can't remember
what they are exactly, but if you have a need to know this, just ask. There
is a fair amount of information on identifying the ignitor's maker on the
net and in the archives.) I don't think you can see the marks without taking
it out. That's not too hard, but you must be a bit more than "a little
handy."
I had the ignitor replaced once at Firestone. (It took them a full day to
figure out what the problem was, so your mechanic is no dummy.) It was not
OEM. It lasted at least six years, whence along with a coil replacement (and
after a year or so of the aforementioned distributor problems) I decided to
replace the ignitor, too.
Non-OEM ignitors are around 10% to 25% cheaper than OEM, so I think it's a
shortcut some independents will take.
OTOH, if it is non-OEM, I wouldn't sweat it. I base this only on my own
experience. If it's non-OEM and if and when the coil or ignitor next goes,
consider replacing them both at the same time with OEM.
> Battery was replaced once after it died on me one winter ( -32 C).
Do you have a voltmeter? You might want to at least check its voltage while
running and not running.
Although if one is really attuned to one's car's start, one can hear and
feel when the battery is going. Cranking takes longer...
> Still original alternator.
Watch that one. Check that battery and, if it's at least four years old and
showing signs of wear, consider a new, high quality one.
> Plug wires were never replaced. It is just that I never know what&when
> is going to break,
> and if it could be dangerous ( sudden engine stop on highway middle
> lane ).
Replace them, again with OEM. Seriously, this is not hard. Just gotta get
used to the little 'twist and yank' necessary to disconnect the ends from
the plugs and distributor leads. www.slhonda.com sells the set for about $62
+ maybe $7 for shipping (assuming they ship to Canada).
Some may beg to differ with the wire replacement suggesiton. If you have a
multimeter, maybe check the resistances of the wires and report back. There
are some other checks you can do, too.
Keep checking back to get others' opinions on all, so, you know, you feel
good about your decision making process.
> Ignitor was replaced once - not OEM, it was emergency
> first-mechanic-sighted replacement. How do I know if mechanic will be
> using OEM parts or not anyways?
Short of taking it out and reporting the marks on it, I think one can only
ask the (independent?) mechanic. Call him up. They get questions like this a
lot. If he's not sure if it's OEM, ask from whom he buys them; report back
here. The marks will tell a person whether it is OEM or not. (Can't remember
what they are exactly, but if you have a need to know this, just ask. There
is a fair amount of information on identifying the ignitor's maker on the
net and in the archives.) I don't think you can see the marks without taking
it out. That's not too hard, but you must be a bit more than "a little
handy."
I had the ignitor replaced once at Firestone. (It took them a full day to
figure out what the problem was, so your mechanic is no dummy.) It was not
OEM. It lasted at least six years, whence along with a coil replacement (and
after a year or so of the aforementioned distributor problems) I decided to
replace the ignitor, too.
Non-OEM ignitors are around 10% to 25% cheaper than OEM, so I think it's a
shortcut some independents will take.
OTOH, if it is non-OEM, I wouldn't sweat it. I base this only on my own
experience. If it's non-OEM and if and when the coil or ignitor next goes,
consider replacing them both at the same time with OEM.
> Battery was replaced once after it died on me one winter ( -32 C).
Do you have a voltmeter? You might want to at least check its voltage while
running and not running.
Although if one is really attuned to one's car's start, one can hear and
feel when the battery is going. Cranking takes longer...
> Still original alternator.
Watch that one. Check that battery and, if it's at least four years old and
showing signs of wear, consider a new, high quality one.
> Plug wires were never replaced. It is just that I never know what&when
> is going to break,
> and if it could be dangerous ( sudden engine stop on highway middle
> lane ).
Replace them, again with OEM. Seriously, this is not hard. Just gotta get
used to the little 'twist and yank' necessary to disconnect the ends from
the plugs and distributor leads. www.slhonda.com sells the set for about $62
+ maybe $7 for shipping (assuming they ship to Canada).
Some may beg to differ with the wire replacement suggesiton. If you have a
multimeter, maybe check the resistances of the wires and report back. There
are some other checks you can do, too.
Keep checking back to get others' opinions on all, so, you know, you feel
good about your decision making process.
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda Civic 1993 Should I replace or not ?
Don't have any instruments or tools. Generally I can do stuff if I make
up my mind to do it, problem is spare time - I don't have it.
You've all being very helpfull, thanks very much. I hope ( or not,
hopefully there will be no need ) we continue exchanging information in
future.
Regards, Ranko.
up my mind to do it, problem is spare time - I don't have it.
You've all being very helpfull, thanks very much. I hope ( or not,
hopefully there will be no need ) we continue exchanging information in
future.
Regards, Ranko.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cutie
Honda Civic - Del Sol - CRX
3
04-12-2008 10:50 AM
funkmeraw
Honda Civic - Del Sol - CRX
0
01-22-2008 06:03 PM
dzserge
Other Honda Models
2
12-13-2007 11:17 PM
Mitleid
Honda Mailing List
52
09-16-2004 11:38 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)