honda.lioness@gmail.com wrote in news:e30b4f2b-c43f-4f86-9da5-
9efb77fbc04a@l16g2000pra.googlegroups.com:

> Anyone driving a coupe or sedan that gets less than 35 mpg is a leach
> on society.




I disagree, since I pay full retail dollar for every ounce of fuel I use.
Nobody's giving me the gas at their expense.


--
Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

 

> Oh, I see--YOU get to set

I am not setting anything.

 

On Apr 26, 9:01 am, Tegger <inva...@invalid.inv> wrote:
> honda.lion...@gmail.com wrote
> > Anyone driving a coupe or sedan that gets less than 35 mpg is a leach
> > on society.
>
> I disagree, since I pay full retail dollar for every ounce of fuel I use.
> Nobody's giving me the gas at their expense.

I meant that excessive use of oil promotes war and environmental
problems.

 

<honda.lioness@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c2e25a43-2e5b-4d15-b712-f2d5ef1ae5c2@f1g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 26, 9:01 am, Tegger <inva...@invalid.inv> wrote:
>> honda.lion...@gmail.com wrote
>> > Anyone driving a coupe or sedan that gets less than 35 mpg is a leach
>> > on society.
>>
>> I disagree, since I pay full retail dollar for every ounce of fuel I use.
>> Nobody's giving me the gas at their expense.
>
> I meant that excessive use of oil promotes war and environmental
> problems.

Then move out from the city and live in a cave in the mountains!

 

<honda.lioness@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:33f30032-a6bf-418b-b223-3eb36ce41db5@n7g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
> "Pszemol" <Psze...@PolBox.com> wrote:
>> <honda.lion...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>> > Anyone driving a coupe or sedan that gets less than 35 mpg
>> > is a leach on society.
>>
>> You are so ridiculous...
>>
>> Why 35mpg and not 55mpg?
>
> Because 35 is easily obtained today.

Easier is very relative term... Easier maybe for you bot not for everybody.

> It was written partly tongue in cheek, as a partial response to by
> someone else that this is about what God intended. ;-)

I see...

>> At least I am not cheating Carfax to get my fee back...
>
> ? You have the wrong person.

My appologies in this case.

 

On Apr 26, 10:41 am, "Pszemol" <Psze...@PolBox.com> wrote:
> <honda.lion...@gmail.com> wrote

> >> Why 35mpg and not 55mpg?
>
> > Because 35 is easily obtained today.
>
>Easier maybe for you bot not for everybody.

It is an easy matter to buy a coupe or sedan that gets 35 mpg or more.
We disagree.

 

On Apr 26, 10:38 am, "Pszemol" <Psze...@PolBox.com> wrote:
> <honda.lion...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c2e25a43-2e5b-4d15-b712-f2d5ef1ae5c2@f1g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Apr 26, 9:01 am, Tegger <inva...@invalid.inv> wrote:
> >> honda.lion...@gmail.com wrote
> >> > Anyone driving a coupe or sedan that gets less than 35 mpg is a leach
> >> > on society.
>
> >> I disagree, since I pay full retail dollar for every ounce of fuel I use.
> >> Nobody's giving me the gas at their expense.
>
> > I meant that excessive use of oil promotes war and environmental
> > problems.
>
> Then move out from the city and live in a cave in the mountains!

I do not see how your answer reduces oil use.

 

honda.lioness@gmail.com wrote:
> On Apr 26, 10:41 am, "Pszemol" <Psze...@PolBox.com> wrote:
>> <honda.lion...@gmail.com> wrote
>
>>>> Why 35mpg and not 55mpg?
>>> Because 35 is easily obtained today.
>> Easier maybe for you bot not for everybody.
>
> It is an easy matter to buy a coupe or sedan that gets 35 mpg or more.
> We disagree.

why are you bothering with this guy? you'd get more sense from an
a.l.i.c.e. bot.

 

honda.lioness@gmail.com wrote:
> On Apr 26, 10:38 am, "Pszemol" <Psze...@PolBox.com> wrote:
>> <honda.lion...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:c2e25a43-2e5b-4d15-b712-f2d5ef1ae5c2@f1g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>> On Apr 26, 9:01 am, Tegger <inva...@invalid.inv> wrote:
>>>> honda.lion...@gmail.com wrote
>>>>> Anyone driving a coupe or sedan that gets less than 35 mpg is a leach
>>>>> on society.
>>>> I disagree, since I pay full retail dollar for every ounce of fuel I use.
>>>> Nobody's giving me the gas at their expense.
>>> I meant that excessive use of oil promotes war and environmental
>>> problems.
>> Then move out from the city and live in a cave in the mountains!
>
> I do not see how your answer reduces oil use.
>
>
>

http://www.pandorabots.com/pandora/t...d922d97e345aa1

 

Tegger wrote:
> honda.lioness@gmail.com wrote in news:e30b4f2b-c43f-4f86-9da5-
> 9efb77fbc04a@l16g2000pra.googlegroups.com:
>
>> Anyone driving a coupe or sedan that gets less than 35 mpg is a leach
>> on society.
>
>
>
>
> I disagree, since I pay full retail dollar for every ounce of fuel I use.
> Nobody's giving me the gas at their expense.
>
>

Not that I necessarily agree with the 'leech' comment, but you
aren't paying the full cost of gasoline. If all environmental costs were
added in, *you'd* be driving that 65mpg scooter, because you wouldn't be
able to afford gas for anything else...

 

Leftie <No@Thanks.net> wrote in news:fn2Jl.43931$gC1.4585@newsfe19.iad:

> Tegger wrote:
>> honda.lioness@gmail.com wrote in news:e30b4f2b-c43f-4f86-9da5-
>> 9efb77fbc04a@l16g2000pra.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>> Anyone driving a coupe or sedan that gets less than 35 mpg is a
>>> leach on society.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I disagree, since I pay full retail dollar for every ounce of fuel I
>> use. Nobody's giving me the gas at their expense.
>>
>>
>
> Not that I necessarily agree with the 'leech' comment, but you
> aren't paying the full cost of gasoline. If all environmental costs
> were added in, *you'd* be driving that 65mpg scooter, because you
> wouldn't be able to afford gas for anything else...



"Environmental costs" are invented and quantified by the capricious whim of
activists and politicians. They are not true costs.

Now if you want to remove the SUBSIDIES from petroleum so the TRUE costs
are reflected in the pump price, I would wholeheartedly agree with that.


--
Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

 

In article
<7cf61074-5558-4b92-8d29-8515700e0533@w35g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
honda.lioness@gmail.com wrote:

> It is an easy matter to buy a coupe or sedan that gets 35 mpg or more.

Name 10.

OK, I'll make it easy: name 5.

Now name 5 that people want as their sole car, to do everything from
grocery runs to driving over the mountains and through the snow to see
their parents/children, or to take their children to see grandma.

 

On Apr 26, 2:52 pm, Tegger <inva...@invalid.inv> wrote:
> Leftie <N...@Thanks.net> wrote innews:fn2Jl.43931$gC1.4585@newsfe19.iad:
>
>
>
> > Tegger wrote:
> >> honda.lion...@gmail.com wrote in news:e30b4f2b-c43f-4f86-9da5-
> >> 9efb77fbc...@l16g2000pra.googlegroups.com:
>
> >>> Anyone driving a coupe or sedan that gets less than 35 mpg is a
> >>> leach on society.
>
> >> I disagree, since I pay full retail dollar for every ounce of fuel I
> >> use. Nobody's giving me the gas at their expense.
>
> > Not that I necessarily agree with the 'leech' comment, but you
> > aren't paying the full cost of gasoline. If all environmental costs
> > were added in, *you'd* be driving that 65mpg scooter, because you
> > wouldn't be able to afford gas for anything else...
>
> "Environmental costs" are invented and quantified by the capricious whim of
> activists and politicians. They are not true costs.

You need to google on this. Chevron, Exxon and the like pay a lot of
money in several ways to cover environmental costs.

 

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <el...@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
> honda.lion...@gmail.com wrote:
> > It is an easy matter to buy a coupe or sedan that gets 35 mpg or more.
>
> Name 10.

Why isn't one enough? Make sense or be ignored.

 

Tegger wrote:
> Leftie <No@Thanks.net> wrote in news:fn2Jl.43931$gC1.4585@newsfe19.iad:
>
>
>>Tegger wrote:
>>
>>>honda.lioness@gmail.com wrote in news:e30b4f2b-c43f-4f86-9da5-
>>>9efb77fbc04a@l16g2000pra.googlegroups.com:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Anyone driving a coupe or sedan that gets less than 35 mpg is a
>>>>leach on society.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I disagree, since I pay full retail dollar for every ounce of fuel I
>>>use. Nobody's giving me the gas at their expense.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Not that I necessarily agree with the 'leech' comment, but you
>>aren't paying the full cost of gasoline. If all environmental costs
>>were added in, *you'd* be driving that 65mpg scooter, because you
>>wouldn't be able to afford gas for anything else...
>
>
>
>
> "Environmental costs" are invented and quantified by the capricious whim of
> activists and politicians. They are not true costs.
>
> Now if you want to remove the SUBSIDIES from petroleum so the TRUE costs
> are reflected in the pump price, I would wholeheartedly agree with that.


Thank You for an ounce of sanity here.

"The sky is falling" zealots have move far beyond environmentalism on to
promoting the same as a religion.

Just to balance things out, I think I'll go for a forty mile drive in my
'55 President sedan that only gets about 25mpg...

<G>

JT