Element Load Capacity
11-28-2003 | 12:23 AM
#61
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Element Load Capacity
L Alpert wrote:
> Tony Hwang wrote:
>
>>L Alpert wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Becker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>L Alpert wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Becker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife
>>>>>>plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it
>>>>>>close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a
>>>>>>car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at
>>>>>>Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market
>>>>>>and give him a piece of my mind.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
>>>>carry so little!
>>>>Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>>>toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>>>
>>>
>>>Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it
>>>myself looking at the size of the thing.
>>>
>>
>>Hi,
>>Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It had
>>many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight was at
>>near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments with goose
>>feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
>>Tony
>
>
> Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work under. I
> know, make it look cool but completely useless.....
>
Hi,
Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind).
Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side)
Tony
>
11-28-2003 | 12:23 AM
#62
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Element Load Capacity
L Alpert wrote:
> Tony Hwang wrote:
>
>>L Alpert wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Becker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>L Alpert wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Becker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife
>>>>>>plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it
>>>>>>close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a
>>>>>>car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at
>>>>>>Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market
>>>>>>and give him a piece of my mind.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
>>>>carry so little!
>>>>Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>>>toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>>>
>>>
>>>Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it
>>>myself looking at the size of the thing.
>>>
>>
>>Hi,
>>Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It had
>>many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight was at
>>near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments with goose
>>feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
>>Tony
>
>
> Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work under. I
> know, make it look cool but completely useless.....
>
Hi,
Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind).
Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side)
Tony
>
11-28-2003 | 12:23 AM
#63
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Element Load Capacity
L Alpert wrote:
> Tony Hwang wrote:
>
>>L Alpert wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Becker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>L Alpert wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Becker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife
>>>>>>plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it
>>>>>>close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a
>>>>>>car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at
>>>>>>Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market
>>>>>>and give him a piece of my mind.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
>>>>carry so little!
>>>>Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>>>toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>>>
>>>
>>>Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it
>>>myself looking at the size of the thing.
>>>
>>
>>Hi,
>>Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It had
>>many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight was at
>>near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments with goose
>>feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
>>Tony
>
>
> Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work under. I
> know, make it look cool but completely useless.....
>
Hi,
Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind).
Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side)
Tony
>
11-28-2003 | 12:23 AM
#64
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Element Load Capacity
L Alpert wrote:
> Tony Hwang wrote:
>
>>L Alpert wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Becker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>L Alpert wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Becker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife
>>>>>>plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it
>>>>>>close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a
>>>>>>car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at
>>>>>>Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market
>>>>>>and give him a piece of my mind.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
>>>>carry so little!
>>>>Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>>>toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>>>
>>>
>>>Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it
>>>myself looking at the size of the thing.
>>>
>>
>>Hi,
>>Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It had
>>many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight was at
>>near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments with goose
>>feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
>>Tony
>
>
> Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work under. I
> know, make it look cool but completely useless.....
>
Hi,
Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind).
Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side)
Tony
>
11-28-2003 | 12:23 PM
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Element Load Capacity
Tony Hwang wrote:
> L Alpert wrote:
>> Tony Hwang wrote:
>>
>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife
>>>>>>> plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it
>>>>>>> close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a
>>>>>>> car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at
>>>>>>> Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market
>>>>>>> and give him a piece of my mind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car
>>>>> will carry so little!
>>>>> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>>>> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed
>>>> it myself looking at the size of the thing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It
>>> had many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight
>>> was at near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments
>>> with goose feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
>>> Tony
>>
>>
>> Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work
>> under. I know, make it look cool but completely useless.....
>>
> Hi,
> Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind).
> Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side)
> Tony
I used to be one as well. I have been demoted to manager.....
> L Alpert wrote:
>> Tony Hwang wrote:
>>
>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife
>>>>>>> plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it
>>>>>>> close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a
>>>>>>> car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at
>>>>>>> Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market
>>>>>>> and give him a piece of my mind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car
>>>>> will carry so little!
>>>>> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>>>> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed
>>>> it myself looking at the size of the thing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It
>>> had many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight
>>> was at near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments
>>> with goose feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
>>> Tony
>>
>>
>> Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work
>> under. I know, make it look cool but completely useless.....
>>
> Hi,
> Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind).
> Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side)
> Tony
I used to be one as well. I have been demoted to manager.....
11-28-2003 | 12:23 PM
#66
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Element Load Capacity
Tony Hwang wrote:
> L Alpert wrote:
>> Tony Hwang wrote:
>>
>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife
>>>>>>> plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it
>>>>>>> close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a
>>>>>>> car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at
>>>>>>> Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market
>>>>>>> and give him a piece of my mind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car
>>>>> will carry so little!
>>>>> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>>>> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed
>>>> it myself looking at the size of the thing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It
>>> had many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight
>>> was at near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments
>>> with goose feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
>>> Tony
>>
>>
>> Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work
>> under. I know, make it look cool but completely useless.....
>>
> Hi,
> Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind).
> Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side)
> Tony
I used to be one as well. I have been demoted to manager.....
> L Alpert wrote:
>> Tony Hwang wrote:
>>
>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife
>>>>>>> plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it
>>>>>>> close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a
>>>>>>> car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at
>>>>>>> Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market
>>>>>>> and give him a piece of my mind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car
>>>>> will carry so little!
>>>>> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>>>> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed
>>>> it myself looking at the size of the thing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It
>>> had many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight
>>> was at near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments
>>> with goose feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
>>> Tony
>>
>>
>> Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work
>> under. I know, make it look cool but completely useless.....
>>
> Hi,
> Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind).
> Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side)
> Tony
I used to be one as well. I have been demoted to manager.....
11-28-2003 | 12:23 PM
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Element Load Capacity
Tony Hwang wrote:
> L Alpert wrote:
>> Tony Hwang wrote:
>>
>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife
>>>>>>> plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it
>>>>>>> close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a
>>>>>>> car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at
>>>>>>> Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market
>>>>>>> and give him a piece of my mind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car
>>>>> will carry so little!
>>>>> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>>>> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed
>>>> it myself looking at the size of the thing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It
>>> had many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight
>>> was at near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments
>>> with goose feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
>>> Tony
>>
>>
>> Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work
>> under. I know, make it look cool but completely useless.....
>>
> Hi,
> Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind).
> Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side)
> Tony
I used to be one as well. I have been demoted to manager.....
> L Alpert wrote:
>> Tony Hwang wrote:
>>
>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife
>>>>>>> plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it
>>>>>>> close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a
>>>>>>> car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at
>>>>>>> Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market
>>>>>>> and give him a piece of my mind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car
>>>>> will carry so little!
>>>>> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>>>> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed
>>>> it myself looking at the size of the thing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It
>>> had many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight
>>> was at near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments
>>> with goose feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
>>> Tony
>>
>>
>> Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work
>> under. I know, make it look cool but completely useless.....
>>
> Hi,
> Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind).
> Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side)
> Tony
I used to be one as well. I have been demoted to manager.....
11-28-2003 | 12:23 PM
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Element Load Capacity
Tony Hwang wrote:
> L Alpert wrote:
>> Tony Hwang wrote:
>>
>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife
>>>>>>> plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it
>>>>>>> close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a
>>>>>>> car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at
>>>>>>> Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market
>>>>>>> and give him a piece of my mind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car
>>>>> will carry so little!
>>>>> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>>>> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed
>>>> it myself looking at the size of the thing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It
>>> had many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight
>>> was at near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments
>>> with goose feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
>>> Tony
>>
>>
>> Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work
>> under. I know, make it look cool but completely useless.....
>>
> Hi,
> Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind).
> Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side)
> Tony
I used to be one as well. I have been demoted to manager.....
> L Alpert wrote:
>> Tony Hwang wrote:
>>
>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife
>>>>>>> plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it
>>>>>>> close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a
>>>>>>> car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at
>>>>>>> Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market
>>>>>>> and give him a piece of my mind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car
>>>>> will carry so little!
>>>>> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>>>> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed
>>>> it myself looking at the size of the thing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It
>>> had many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight
>>> was at near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments
>>> with goose feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
>>> Tony
>>
>>
>> Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work
>> under. I know, make it look cool but completely useless.....
>>
> Hi,
> Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind).
> Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side)
> Tony
I used to be one as well. I have been demoted to manager.....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boomhower
Car Parts For Sale
2
01-09-2006 12:16 AM
JPT
Honda Mailing List
8
08-06-2004 09:47 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)