Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
> In article <WKPAg.218$Db4.20494@news1.epix.net>, > Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote: > > >>>"Cheap insurance"? ABSOLUTELY. There is no cheaper insurance for an >>>engine than oil changes. >> >>But it is wasted money, no matter how cheap. > > > Not if it takes the most expensive part of your car easily from 100K > miles to 200K miles. What evidence do you have that it makes that difference? None, I suspect, since none exists. I've owned three vehicles that went over 165K miles and all of them ran fine. Their oil was changed every 5000-7000 miles. They were all put to rest for reasons other than engine problems (body rot, broken transmission, etc.) |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
In article <aFTAg.230$Db4.20774@news1.epix.net>,
Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote: > And why not change oil at 1,000 miles rather than 3,000 as that would > reduce wear even more right? Because the benefits go on a curve. |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
In article <aFTAg.230$Db4.20774@news1.epix.net>,
Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote: > And why not change oil at 1,000 miles rather than 3,000 as that would > reduce wear even more right? Because the benefits go on a curve. |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
In article <aFTAg.230$Db4.20774@news1.epix.net>,
Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote: > And why not change oil at 1,000 miles rather than 3,000 as that would > reduce wear even more right? Because the benefits go on a curve. |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
In article <hCTAg.228$Db4.20512@news1.epix.net>,
Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote: > Comparing oil changes to insurance is simply stupid. They aren't > equivalent at all. You buy insurance to help when crap happens. In your world, maybe. |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
In article <hCTAg.228$Db4.20512@news1.epix.net>,
Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote: > Comparing oil changes to insurance is simply stupid. They aren't > equivalent at all. You buy insurance to help when crap happens. In your world, maybe. |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
In article <hCTAg.228$Db4.20512@news1.epix.net>,
Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote: > Comparing oil changes to insurance is simply stupid. They aren't > equivalent at all. You buy insurance to help when crap happens. In your world, maybe. |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
In article <4NTAg.235$Db4.20752@news1.epix.net>,
Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote: > The closest I've > seen to a real-world test is the one that CR did many years ago with a > taxi fleet. They found no measurable wear in engines changed at 6,000 > miles (if memory serves) running plain old dino oil. And when you run your car like a taxi, 24/7 with the engine on, those tests will be relevant to you. If you drive your car like a stay at home mom, a couple miles here and there with the engine never getting warm, that would create different results. Did CR test those kinds of conditions? You can't extrapolate the CR taxi test into the normal world where cars aren't run like taxis. |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
In article <4NTAg.235$Db4.20752@news1.epix.net>,
Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote: > The closest I've > seen to a real-world test is the one that CR did many years ago with a > taxi fleet. They found no measurable wear in engines changed at 6,000 > miles (if memory serves) running plain old dino oil. And when you run your car like a taxi, 24/7 with the engine on, those tests will be relevant to you. If you drive your car like a stay at home mom, a couple miles here and there with the engine never getting warm, that would create different results. Did CR test those kinds of conditions? You can't extrapolate the CR taxi test into the normal world where cars aren't run like taxis. |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
In article <4NTAg.235$Db4.20752@news1.epix.net>,
Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote: > The closest I've > seen to a real-world test is the one that CR did many years ago with a > taxi fleet. They found no measurable wear in engines changed at 6,000 > miles (if memory serves) running plain old dino oil. And when you run your car like a taxi, 24/7 with the engine on, those tests will be relevant to you. If you drive your car like a stay at home mom, a couple miles here and there with the engine never getting warm, that would create different results. Did CR test those kinds of conditions? You can't extrapolate the CR taxi test into the normal world where cars aren't run like taxis. |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
In article <2HTAg.232$Db4.20766@news1.epix.net>,
Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote: > >>Show me that oil changes at 3,000 miles vs. > >>10,000 make a difference. > > > > > > http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/sludg...ng_sludge.html > > I think your cut and paste keys are stuck. This is meaningless and you > can't even figure that out. You asked someone to show you something that could break inside the engine due to insufficient oil changes. From that page: "If the owner had left it long enough, the pickup would eventually have choked on the sludge, causing oil starvation and engine seizure." |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
In article <2HTAg.232$Db4.20766@news1.epix.net>,
Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote: > >>Show me that oil changes at 3,000 miles vs. > >>10,000 make a difference. > > > > > > http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/sludg...ng_sludge.html > > I think your cut and paste keys are stuck. This is meaningless and you > can't even figure that out. You asked someone to show you something that could break inside the engine due to insufficient oil changes. From that page: "If the owner had left it long enough, the pickup would eventually have choked on the sludge, causing oil starvation and engine seizure." |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
In article <2HTAg.232$Db4.20766@news1.epix.net>,
Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote: > >>Show me that oil changes at 3,000 miles vs. > >>10,000 make a difference. > > > > > > http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/sludg...ng_sludge.html > > I think your cut and paste keys are stuck. This is meaningless and you > can't even figure that out. You asked someone to show you something that could break inside the engine due to insufficient oil changes. From that page: "If the owner had left it long enough, the pickup would eventually have choked on the sludge, causing oil starvation and engine seizure." |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
"Matt Whiting" <whiting@epix.net> wrote in message news:aFTAg.230$Db4.20774@news1.epix.net... > > And why not change oil at 1,000 miles rather than 3,000 as that would > reduce wear even more right? How about 500 miles? Why not change it > every morning before going to work? > What!? You mean your wife does not do this for you now Matt? Man, we gotta talk... -- -Mike- mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
"Matt Whiting" <whiting@epix.net> wrote in message news:aFTAg.230$Db4.20774@news1.epix.net... > > And why not change oil at 1,000 miles rather than 3,000 as that would > reduce wear even more right? How about 500 miles? Why not change it > every morning before going to work? > What!? You mean your wife does not do this for you now Matt? Man, we gotta talk... -- -Mike- mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands