"Cam" <Cams18@nospam.com> wrote in message news:...
> On city/highway driving, my Infiniti G20T now reached 65mpg - 73mpg. No
> battery required, and no stingy driving required. That's right, I will
> let
> you put my car to test (if you belong to a media company), by driving from
> WA State to CA with 1 tank of fuel, 14-15 gallons. My Mercedes E320 also
> reached 51mpg mark, I could improve it a little bit better if I have the
> time. I'm thinking to write a book on how to increase the MPG, My
> question
> to you is, would you think people will buy my book at $99 The problem is,
> not every one has the same skill in terms of car mechanic and computer
> program, the lack of their understanding could make my book looks like a
> scam.
>
> Thanks for your input.
>
> Cam
> 20 years ElectroMechanic engineer.
> Why buy expensive hybrid when you can have luxury, safety, force and
> efficiency at the same time?
>
>
> Here is Info about Mercedes MINI Range,
> http://forums.mg-rover.org/showthread.php?t=194886
> Remember, 72.4 miles per imperial gallon translates to 60.28 miles per US
> gallon- and this is for the average figure of combined city/highway
> driving




roughly speaking, I increase its efficiency by 3X. Currently it generates
very low heat, about 142 degree-F on the engine's surface, before the
modification it was so hot if I drove it excessively.
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/11865.shtml

My Mercedes is also awesome, I love these two machines. The theory will
work with any car, because they all use Gas combustion system. I believe my
theory will help diesel machine by 2X, not 3X like the Gas engines.

Cam

 

Cam wrote:
> "Cam" <Cams18@nospam.com> wrote in message news:...
>
>>On city/highway driving, my Infiniti G20T now reached 65mpg - 73mpg. No
>>battery required, and no stingy driving required. That's right, I will
>>let
>>you put my car to test (if you belong to a media company), by driving from
>>WA State to CA with 1 tank of fuel, 14-15 gallons. My Mercedes E320 also
>>reached 51mpg mark, I could improve it a little bit better if I have the
>>time. I'm thinking to write a book on how to increase the MPG, My
>>question
>>to you is, would you think people will buy my book at $99 The problem is,
>>not every one has the same skill in terms of car mechanic and computer
>>program, the lack of their understanding could make my book looks like a
>>scam.
>>
>>Thanks for your input.
>>
>>Cam
>>20 years ElectroMechanic engineer.
>>Why buy expensive hybrid when you can have luxury, safety, force and
>>efficiency at the same time?
>>
>>
>>Here is Info about Mercedes MINI Range,
>>http://forums.mg-rover.org/showthread.php?t=194886
>>Remember, 72.4 miles per imperial gallon translates to 60.28 miles per US
>>gallon- and this is for the average figure of combined city/highway
>>driving
>
>
>
>
>
> roughly speaking, I increase its efficiency by 3X. Currently it generates
> very low heat, about 142 degree-F on the engine's surface, before the
> modification it was so hot if I drove it excessively.
> http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/11865.shtml
>
> My Mercedes is also awesome, I love these two machines. The theory will
> work with any car, because they all use Gas combustion system. I believe my
> theory will help diesel machine by 2X, not 3X like the Gas engines.
>
> Cam
>



Heh... Will it work on my 1955 Studebaker President sedan that
presently gets about 28 mpg on the highway?

Of course, I'm pushing 4,200 lbs of iron with 1955 technology which is
simple and user friendly. And that's with an automatic tranny with
lockup converter...

JT

 

Cam wrote:
> "Cam" <Cams18@nospam.com> wrote in message news:...
>
>>On city/highway driving, my Infiniti G20T now reached 65mpg - 73mpg. No
>>battery required, and no stingy driving required. That's right, I will
>>let
>>you put my car to test (if you belong to a media company), by driving from
>>WA State to CA with 1 tank of fuel, 14-15 gallons. My Mercedes E320 also
>>reached 51mpg mark, I could improve it a little bit better if I have the
>>time. I'm thinking to write a book on how to increase the MPG, My
>>question
>>to you is, would you think people will buy my book at $99 The problem is,
>>not every one has the same skill in terms of car mechanic and computer
>>program, the lack of their understanding could make my book looks like a
>>scam.
>>
>>Thanks for your input.
>>
>>Cam
>>20 years ElectroMechanic engineer.
>>Why buy expensive hybrid when you can have luxury, safety, force and
>>efficiency at the same time?
>>
>>
>>Here is Info about Mercedes MINI Range,
>>http://forums.mg-rover.org/showthread.php?t=194886
>>Remember, 72.4 miles per imperial gallon translates to 60.28 miles per US
>>gallon- and this is for the average figure of combined city/highway
>>driving
>
>
>
>
>
> roughly speaking, I increase its efficiency by 3X. Currently it generates
> very low heat, about 142 degree-F on the engine's surface, before the
> modification it was so hot if I drove it excessively.
> http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/11865.shtml
>
> My Mercedes is also awesome, I love these two machines. The theory will
> work with any car, because they all use Gas combustion system. I believe my
> theory will help diesel machine by 2X, not 3X like the Gas engines.
>
> Cam
>



Heh... Will it work on my 1955 Studebaker President sedan that
presently gets about 28 mpg on the highway?

Of course, I'm pushing 4,200 lbs of iron with 1955 technology which is
simple and user friendly. And that's with an automatic tranny with
lockup converter...

JT

 

"Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpy@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote in message
news:0XpTi.262501$ax1.170858@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
>
> Cam wrote:
>> "Cam" <Cams18@nospam.com> wrote in message news:...
>>
>>>On city/highway driving, my Infiniti G20T now reached 65mpg - 73mpg. No
>>>battery required, and no stingy driving required. That's right, I will
>>>let
>>>you put my car to test (if you belong to a media company), by driving
>>>from
>>>WA State to CA with 1 tank of fuel, 14-15 gallons. My Mercedes E320 also
>>>reached 51mpg mark, I could improve it a little bit better if I have the
>>>time. I'm thinking to write a book on how to increase the MPG, My
>>>question
>>>to you is, would you think people will buy my book at $99 ?? The problem
>>>is,
>>>not every one has the same skill in terms of car mechanic and computer...
>
>
>
> Heh... Will it work on my 1955 Studebaker President sedan that
> presently gets about 28 mpg on the highway?
>
> Of course, I'm pushing 4,200 lbs of iron with 1955 technology which is
> simple and user friendly. And that's with an automatic tranny with
> lockup converter...
>
> JT


Au contraire Monsieur, vous devez répondre à ma question d'abord!!! J'ai
l'impression que vous etes pas sérieux, pourquoi dois-je vous répondre
premièrement?

 

"Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpy@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote in message
news:0XpTi.262501$ax1.170858@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
>
> Cam wrote:
>> "Cam" <Cams18@nospam.com> wrote in message news:...
>>
>>>On city/highway driving, my Infiniti G20T now reached 65mpg - 73mpg. No
>>>battery required, and no stingy driving required. That's right, I will
>>>let
>>>you put my car to test (if you belong to a media company), by driving
>>>from
>>>WA State to CA with 1 tank of fuel, 14-15 gallons. My Mercedes E320 also
>>>reached 51mpg mark, I could improve it a little bit better if I have the
>>>time. I'm thinking to write a book on how to increase the MPG, My
>>>question
>>>to you is, would you think people will buy my book at $99 ?? The problem
>>>is,
>>>not every one has the same skill in terms of car mechanic and computer...
>
>
>
> Heh... Will it work on my 1955 Studebaker President sedan that
> presently gets about 28 mpg on the highway?
>
> Of course, I'm pushing 4,200 lbs of iron with 1955 technology which is
> simple and user friendly. And that's with an automatic tranny with
> lockup converter...
>
> JT


Au contraire Monsieur, vous devez répondre à ma question d'abord!!! J'ai
l'impression que vous etes pas sérieux, pourquoi dois-je vous répondre
premièrement?

 

Cam wrote:
> "Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpy@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote in message
> news:0XpTi.262501$ax1.170858@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
>>
>>Cam wrote:
>>
>>>"Cam" <Cams18@nospam.com> wrote in message news:...
>>>
>>>
>>>>On city/highway driving, my Infiniti G20T now reached 65mpg - 73mpg. No
>>>>battery required, and no stingy driving required. That's right, I will
>>>>let
>>>>you put my car to test (if you belong to a media company), by driving
>>>>from
>>>>WA State to CA with 1 tank of fuel, 14-15 gallons. My Mercedes E320 also
>>>>reached 51mpg mark, I could improve it a little bit better if I have the
>>>>time. I'm thinking to write a book on how to increase the MPG, My
>>>>question
>>>>to you is, would you think people will buy my book at $99 ?? The problem
>>>>is,
>>>>not every one has the same skill in terms of car mechanic and computer...
>>
>>
>>
>>Heh... Will it work on my 1955 Studebaker President sedan that
>>presently gets about 28 mpg on the highway?
>>
>>Of course, I'm pushing 4,200 lbs of iron with 1955 technology which is
>>simple and user friendly. And that's with an automatic tranny with
>>lockup converter...
>>
>>JT
>
>
>
> Au contraire Monsieur, vous devez répondre à ma question d'abord!!! J'ai
> l'impression que vous etes pas sérieux, pourquoi dois-je vous répondre
> premièrement?
>
>


Il y ressemble... Je ne suis pas sur le point de tomber 99bux sans un
petit fond vérifiable. Ainsi avant que j'essaie de modifier mon char
ancien, je veux plus d'informations et qui sait ? Peut-être je
l'essaierai sur mes '83 FE Civiques Honda.

JT

 

Cam wrote:
> "Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpy@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote in message
> news:0XpTi.262501$ax1.170858@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
>>
>>Cam wrote:
>>
>>>"Cam" <Cams18@nospam.com> wrote in message news:...
>>>
>>>
>>>>On city/highway driving, my Infiniti G20T now reached 65mpg - 73mpg. No
>>>>battery required, and no stingy driving required. That's right, I will
>>>>let
>>>>you put my car to test (if you belong to a media company), by driving
>>>>from
>>>>WA State to CA with 1 tank of fuel, 14-15 gallons. My Mercedes E320 also
>>>>reached 51mpg mark, I could improve it a little bit better if I have the
>>>>time. I'm thinking to write a book on how to increase the MPG, My
>>>>question
>>>>to you is, would you think people will buy my book at $99 ?? The problem
>>>>is,
>>>>not every one has the same skill in terms of car mechanic and computer...
>>
>>
>>
>>Heh... Will it work on my 1955 Studebaker President sedan that
>>presently gets about 28 mpg on the highway?
>>
>>Of course, I'm pushing 4,200 lbs of iron with 1955 technology which is
>>simple and user friendly. And that's with an automatic tranny with
>>lockup converter...
>>
>>JT
>
>
>
> Au contraire Monsieur, vous devez répondre à ma question d'abord!!! J'ai
> l'impression que vous etes pas sérieux, pourquoi dois-je vous répondre
> premièrement?
>
>


Il y ressemble... Je ne suis pas sur le point de tomber 99bux sans un
petit fond vérifiable. Ainsi avant que j'essaie de modifier mon char
ancien, je veux plus d'informations et qui sait ? Peut-être je
l'essaierai sur mes '83 FE Civiques Honda.

JT

 

Is this a mangling of the brand name?

DAS

For direct replies replace nospam with schmetterling
---
"Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpy@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote in message
news:AePTi.19432$kj1.12258@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...


Civiques Honda.

 

Is this a mangling of the brand name?

DAS

For direct replies replace nospam with schmetterling
---
"Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpy@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote in message
news:AePTi.19432$kj1.12258@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...


Civiques Honda.

 

It ain't my fault I tell ya!

It's them thar' damned online translators!!

Never the less, I never did get a response from the original perp...

JT




Dori A Schmetterling wrote:
> Is this a mangling of the brand name?
>
> DAS
>
> For direct replies replace nospam with schmetterling
> ---
> "Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpy@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote in message
> news:AePTi.19432$kj1.12258@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
>
> Civiques Honda.
>
>

 

It ain't my fault I tell ya!

It's them thar' damned online translators!!

Never the less, I never did get a response from the original perp...

JT




Dori A Schmetterling wrote:
> Is this a mangling of the brand name?
>
> DAS
>
> For direct replies replace nospam with schmetterling
> ---
> "Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpy@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote in message
> news:AePTi.19432$kj1.12258@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
>
> Civiques Honda.
>
>