On 19 Jun 2006 21:07:06 -0700, "Body Roll" <aglyport@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>flobert wrote:
>> On 19 Jun 2006 15:57:59 -0700, "Body Roll" <aglyport@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Matt Ion wrote:
>> >> jim beam wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> I love my Accord, but I'd take a WRX any day
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > i tested one of the early wrx's, and it didn't impress me. it's quick
>> >> > enough, but doesn't corner like a honda. on balance, i think that
>> >> > matters more.
>> >>
>> >> Perhaps. Depends on where and how you're driving. The thing I miss
>> >> most about my old GLC is the RWD for cornering on the dirt roads 'back
>> >> home' - you just can't power-slide in a FWD
>> >
>> >Forgot to add, 4 wheel drifts in Impreza are controllable due to 50/50
>> >torque split
>> >between the axles. I guess I'll miss that if I get a Civic Si. You just
>> >can't have it all...
>> >Unless you get an Evo!!!
>> >
>> >Controllable drifts? Check.
>> >Razorblade steering precision? Check!
>> >Decent shifter? Check.
>> >Gobs of power? Check.
>> >Affordability? Can't have it all after all.
>> reliability...
>> build quality...
>> maintaince
>>
>> the evo's are terrible for road use, especially the higher h ones
>> (anything over about 280) Major service on them is something like
>> 15-20k miles
>
>Hmm, the warranty is 5 years/60k miles. Unless they prove that you
>raced it
>I don't see how you can get into much trouble. Except with LEO :-)

I recall an article (WSJ?) on how some car companies (and I think
Mitsubishi was specifically mentioned) would take note of participants
in all racing events down to the autocross level and deny any warranty
claims based on participation.

 

Gordon McGrew wrote:
> On 19 Jun 2006 21:07:06 -0700, "Body Roll" <aglyport@gmail.com> wrote:

> I recall an article (WSJ?) on how some car companies (and I think
> Mitsubishi was specifically mentioned) would take note of participants
> in all racing events down to the autocross level and deny any warranty
> claims based on participation.

that's fine. I have no money to blow on the track/autocross anyway.
and i haven't heard many horror stories about evo reliability.
do you have links?

 

Gordon McGrew wrote:
> On 19 Jun 2006 21:07:06 -0700, "Body Roll" <aglyport@gmail.com> wrote:

> I recall an article (WSJ?) on how some car companies (and I think
> Mitsubishi was specifically mentioned) would take note of participants
> in all racing events down to the autocross level and deny any warranty
> claims based on participation.

that's fine. I have no money to blow on the track/autocross anyway.
and i haven't heard many horror stories about evo reliability.
do you have links?

 

Gordon McGrew wrote:
> On 19 Jun 2006 21:07:06 -0700, "Body Roll" <aglyport@gmail.com> wrote:

> I recall an article (WSJ?) on how some car companies (and I think
> Mitsubishi was specifically mentioned) would take note of participants
> in all racing events down to the autocross level and deny any warranty
> claims based on participation.

that's fine. I have no money to blow on the track/autocross anyway.
and i haven't heard many horror stories about evo reliability.
do you have links?

 

"sapper" <sapper268@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150857015.819457.127560@m73g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...
>
> I paid $399 - dealer conveyance fee over the MSRP. If I'd waited, or
> shopped around a bit I might have saved part of that - but I wanted the
> car sight unseen.

I'm sure glad I'm not stupid enough to do that.

 

"sapper" <sapper268@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150857015.819457.127560@m73g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...
>
> I paid $399 - dealer conveyance fee over the MSRP. If I'd waited, or
> shopped around a bit I might have saved part of that - but I wanted the
> car sight unseen.

I'm sure glad I'm not stupid enough to do that.

 

"sapper" <sapper268@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150857015.819457.127560@m73g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...
>
> I paid $399 - dealer conveyance fee over the MSRP. If I'd waited, or
> shopped around a bit I might have saved part of that - but I wanted the
> car sight unseen.

I'm sure glad I'm not stupid enough to do that.

 

Spaz wrote:
> "sapper" <sapper268@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1150857015.819457.127560@m73g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...
> >
> > I paid $399 - dealer conveyance fee over the MSRP. If I'd waited, or
> > shopped around a bit I might have saved part of that - but I wanted the
> > car sight unseen.
>
> I'm sure glad I'm not stupid enough to do that.
^^^^^^
I think "Impatient" would be more fitting.

 

Spaz wrote:
> "sapper" <sapper268@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1150857015.819457.127560@m73g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...
> >
> > I paid $399 - dealer conveyance fee over the MSRP. If I'd waited, or
> > shopped around a bit I might have saved part of that - but I wanted the
> > car sight unseen.
>
> I'm sure glad I'm not stupid enough to do that.
^^^^^^
I think "Impatient" would be more fitting.

 

Spaz wrote:
> "sapper" <sapper268@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1150857015.819457.127560@m73g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...
> >
> > I paid $399 - dealer conveyance fee over the MSRP. If I'd waited, or
> > shopped around a bit I might have saved part of that - but I wanted the
> > car sight unseen.
>
> I'm sure glad I'm not stupid enough to do that.
^^^^^^
I think "Impatient" would be more fitting.

 

On 20 Jun 2006 21:40:36 -0700, "Body Roll" <aglyport@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>Gordon McGrew wrote:
>> On 19 Jun 2006 21:07:06 -0700, "Body Roll" <aglyport@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I recall an article (WSJ?) on how some car companies (and I think
>> Mitsubishi was specifically mentioned) would take note of participants
>> in all racing events down to the autocross level and deny any warranty
>> claims based on participation.
>
>that's fine. I have no money to blow on the track/autocross anyway.
>and i haven't heard many horror stories about evo reliability.
>do you have links?



Well, this is what I found with a Google search:

This is from a defunct web page:

http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache...s&ct=clnk&cd=3

WARNING WILL ROBINSON!!
BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING!!

Just got an official reply to my nice little letter to the president
of
Mitsubishi, asking him to honor my warranty claim.

Here's part of the letter from the customer connections manager:

"It is our determination that the damage done to your vehicle was
directly
related to the use of your vehicle for racing. Your website posts
times,
location, and duration of contests."*

I never told them I had a website, so this confirms all the rumors
we've
been hearing that Mitsubishi monitors our activities, at tracks and on
the
Web.

My advice to all of you is:

1. Do not ever buy a new car with a Mitsubishi warranty. If you want
an
Evo or a Lancer or whatever, buy it used from a General Motors dealer,
and
then purchase the GM aftermarket warranty. GM's warranty is the best
in the
business.

2. If you road race, drag race, autocross, or indulge in any other
motorsport, be aware that Mitsubishi observes some of these events in
person, and notes what Mitsu vehicles are competing.

3. If you communicate on our discussion groups, better get an alias.
Big
Brother is watching this forum and all other lists. They identify us
by
name, car, etc., and use the information to deny warranty claims.
Rumors
have been flying that they deny ALL claims, not just on equipment that
could possibly be damaged by racing.

 

On 20 Jun 2006 21:40:36 -0700, "Body Roll" <aglyport@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>Gordon McGrew wrote:
>> On 19 Jun 2006 21:07:06 -0700, "Body Roll" <aglyport@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I recall an article (WSJ?) on how some car companies (and I think
>> Mitsubishi was specifically mentioned) would take note of participants
>> in all racing events down to the autocross level and deny any warranty
>> claims based on participation.
>
>that's fine. I have no money to blow on the track/autocross anyway.
>and i haven't heard many horror stories about evo reliability.
>do you have links?



Well, this is what I found with a Google search:

This is from a defunct web page:

http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache...s&ct=clnk&cd=3

WARNING WILL ROBINSON!!
BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING!!

Just got an official reply to my nice little letter to the president
of
Mitsubishi, asking him to honor my warranty claim.

Here's part of the letter from the customer connections manager:

"It is our determination that the damage done to your vehicle was
directly
related to the use of your vehicle for racing. Your website posts
times,
location, and duration of contests."*

I never told them I had a website, so this confirms all the rumors
we've
been hearing that Mitsubishi monitors our activities, at tracks and on
the
Web.

My advice to all of you is:

1. Do not ever buy a new car with a Mitsubishi warranty. If you want
an
Evo or a Lancer or whatever, buy it used from a General Motors dealer,
and
then purchase the GM aftermarket warranty. GM's warranty is the best
in the
business.

2. If you road race, drag race, autocross, or indulge in any other
motorsport, be aware that Mitsubishi observes some of these events in
person, and notes what Mitsu vehicles are competing.

3. If you communicate on our discussion groups, better get an alias.
Big
Brother is watching this forum and all other lists. They identify us
by
name, car, etc., and use the information to deny warranty claims.
Rumors
have been flying that they deny ALL claims, not just on equipment that
could possibly be damaged by racing.

 

On 20 Jun 2006 21:40:36 -0700, "Body Roll" <aglyport@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>Gordon McGrew wrote:
>> On 19 Jun 2006 21:07:06 -0700, "Body Roll" <aglyport@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I recall an article (WSJ?) on how some car companies (and I think
>> Mitsubishi was specifically mentioned) would take note of participants
>> in all racing events down to the autocross level and deny any warranty
>> claims based on participation.
>
>that's fine. I have no money to blow on the track/autocross anyway.
>and i haven't heard many horror stories about evo reliability.
>do you have links?



Well, this is what I found with a Google search:

This is from a defunct web page:

http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache...s&ct=clnk&cd=3

WARNING WILL ROBINSON!!
BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING!!

Just got an official reply to my nice little letter to the president
of
Mitsubishi, asking him to honor my warranty claim.

Here's part of the letter from the customer connections manager:

"It is our determination that the damage done to your vehicle was
directly
related to the use of your vehicle for racing. Your website posts
times,
location, and duration of contests."*

I never told them I had a website, so this confirms all the rumors
we've
been hearing that Mitsubishi monitors our activities, at tracks and on
the
Web.

My advice to all of you is:

1. Do not ever buy a new car with a Mitsubishi warranty. If you want
an
Evo or a Lancer or whatever, buy it used from a General Motors dealer,
and
then purchase the GM aftermarket warranty. GM's warranty is the best
in the
business.

2. If you road race, drag race, autocross, or indulge in any other
motorsport, be aware that Mitsubishi observes some of these events in
person, and notes what Mitsu vehicles are competing.

3. If you communicate on our discussion groups, better get an alias.
Big
Brother is watching this forum and all other lists. They identify us
by
name, car, etc., and use the information to deny warranty claims.
Rumors
have been flying that they deny ALL claims, not just on equipment that
could possibly be damaged by racing.

 

Gordon McGrew wrote:

> WARNING WILL ROBINSON!!
> BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING!!
>
> Just got an official reply to my nice little letter to the president
> of Mitsubishi, asking him to honor my warranty claim.
>
> Here's part of the letter from the customer connections manager:
>
> "It is our determination that the damage done to your vehicle was
> directly related to the use of your vehicle for racing. Your website
> posts times, location, and duration of contests."*
>
> I never told them I had a website, so this confirms all the rumors
> we've been hearing that Mitsubishi monitors our activities, at tracks
> and on the Web.

I think my next reply to Mitsubishi would be to request their proof that
the car in question was actually involved in racing itself, including
identifiable video or photos showing the VIN plate...

 

Gordon McGrew wrote:

> WARNING WILL ROBINSON!!
> BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING!!
>
> Just got an official reply to my nice little letter to the president
> of Mitsubishi, asking him to honor my warranty claim.
>
> Here's part of the letter from the customer connections manager:
>
> "It is our determination that the damage done to your vehicle was
> directly related to the use of your vehicle for racing. Your website
> posts times, location, and duration of contests."*
>
> I never told them I had a website, so this confirms all the rumors
> we've been hearing that Mitsubishi monitors our activities, at tracks
> and on the Web.

I think my next reply to Mitsubishi would be to request their proof that
the car in question was actually involved in racing itself, including
identifiable video or photos showing the VIN plate...