Matt Ion wrote:
> nm5k@wt.net wrote:
> > Jim Yanik wrote:
> >
> >>Matt Ion <soundy106@gmail.com> wrote in
> >>news:Clegh.480395$5R2.401317@pd7urf3no:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Grumpy AuContraire wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Uh, the battery is nothing more thann a large capacitor.
> >>>
> >>>Actually, they're not. Capacitors /store/ electrical energy.
> >>>Batteries /create/ it via a chemical reaction. Charging a battery is
> >>>not storing energy; it's (to oversimplify) merely reversing the
> >>>checmical reaction.
> >>>
> >>
> >>The plates of a battery have capacitance.
> >>They are charged by the chemical reaction.
> >
> >
> > A car battery has many farads of capacitance. In other words,
> > it's a very stout capacitor..
>
> Not even close. The smaller the plates of a capacitor, the less the
> capacitance. The further apart they are, the less the capacitance. Lead-acid
> battery plates are EXTREMELY small and EXTREMELY far apart compared to a true
> capacitor's.
>
> If you were to drain the water from a battery and measure the capacitance, I
> suspect you'd find it in the low microfarads, if not picofarads.

Sure. The capacitance I mention is more of an apparant capacitance.
It's not true capacitance per say, but the normal operating car battery
does provide a large apparant capacitance to the system. But this would

not be the case with a non functioning battery.
I use car and deep cycle marine batteries to run radios here in the
house.
My chargers are unfiltered, but yet I have little noise to my radios.
The use of my battery as a cap is a bit different in operation vs a
true
capacitor, but the final apparant filtering is still there. If the
battery were
not acting as a cap of sorts, I would have hash and trash out the
kazoo..
I don't know if this makes any sense, as it's hard for me to describe
stuff
like this off the top of my head..
As a quite dangerous test you could try running a car radio off the
running
alternator with no battery connected. I bet it will be quite noisy,
fairly
unregulated as far as volume, etc vs rpm. IE: if the rpm dropped too
low,
the radio might totally drop out due to the low voltage.
Hook the battery up, and all is smoothed out. Both as far as
regulation,
and also filtering. If thats not acting like a large "apparent"
capacitor,
I don't know what is. The operation is different, but the end results
are
about the same. This is not something I've really thought about too
much,
but I've always considered the usual operating car battery to have many
farads of capacitance, at least as far as overall function. Maybe not
true
in the strict sense, as far as true caps go, but as far as the end
results
of placing it in the system. I dunno if this makes any sense or not..
:/
MK

 

Jim Yanik wrote:

> When you DRAW current from a battery,how does the chemistry knows to start
> converting chemicals to electric current?
> Where does that initial current come from?
>
>
> Simple,the *charge on the plates* decreases and the chemical reaction adds
> more electrons to fill the depletion of the plates charge.

Very good, you get a gold star.

 

Jim Yanik wrote:

> When you DRAW current from a battery,how does the chemistry knows to start
> converting chemicals to electric current?
> Where does that initial current come from?
>
>
> Simple,the *charge on the plates* decreases and the chemical reaction adds
> more electrons to fill the depletion of the plates charge.

Very good, you get a gold star.

 

Jim Yanik wrote:

> When you DRAW current from a battery,how does the chemistry knows to start
> converting chemicals to electric current?
> Where does that initial current come from?
>
>
> Simple,the *charge on the plates* decreases and the chemical reaction adds
> more electrons to fill the depletion of the plates charge.

Very good, you get a gold star.

 

Jim Yanik wrote:

> When you DRAW current from a battery,how does the chemistry knows to start
> converting chemicals to electric current?
> Where does that initial current come from?
>
>
> Simple,the *charge on the plates* decreases and the chemical reaction adds
> more electrons to fill the depletion of the plates charge.

Very good, you get a gold star.

 

I think this is getting pretty far afield. Does anybody feel the alternator
would be stable under varying load with the battery disconnected?

Mike

 

I think this is getting pretty far afield. Does anybody feel the alternator
would be stable under varying load with the battery disconnected?

Mike

 

I think this is getting pretty far afield. Does anybody feel the alternator
would be stable under varying load with the battery disconnected?

Mike

 

I think this is getting pretty far afield. Does anybody feel the alternator
would be stable under varying load with the battery disconnected?

Mike

 

Michael Pardee wrote:
> I think this is getting pretty far afield. Does anybody feel the alternator
> would be stable under varying load with the battery disconnected?

Pretty sure it would, yup, because I once had to drive without one for a week
(manual tranny, obviously - you get really adept at finding even the slightest
grades to park on).

 

Michael Pardee wrote:
> I think this is getting pretty far afield. Does anybody feel the alternator
> would be stable under varying load with the battery disconnected?

Pretty sure it would, yup, because I once had to drive without one for a week
(manual tranny, obviously - you get really adept at finding even the slightest
grades to park on).

 

Michael Pardee wrote:
> I think this is getting pretty far afield. Does anybody feel the alternator
> would be stable under varying load with the battery disconnected?

Pretty sure it would, yup, because I once had to drive without one for a week
(manual tranny, obviously - you get really adept at finding even the slightest
grades to park on).

 

Michael Pardee wrote:
> I think this is getting pretty far afield. Does anybody feel the alternator
> would be stable under varying load with the battery disconnected?

Pretty sure it would, yup, because I once had to drive without one for a week
(manual tranny, obviously - you get really adept at finding even the slightest
grades to park on).

 

Michael Pardee wrote:
> I think this is getting pretty far afield. Does anybody feel the alternator
> would be stable under varying load with the battery disconnected?
>

Thanks for bringing it back, mike. I've been reading all the posts very
closely.

Anyway, as an update, no delayed effects yet, thankfully. Though I'm
not willing to repeat the "experiment" anytime soon: Seems like I have
a shorted rectifier in the alternator. (Does this mean that I'm getting
voltage spikes all the time?) I'm wondering if the battery is now
"absorbing" the spikes, so it seems to boil down again to whether the
battery is acting as a large capacitor..

Thanks again to everyone.

 

Michael Pardee wrote:
> I think this is getting pretty far afield. Does anybody feel the alternator
> would be stable under varying load with the battery disconnected?
>

Thanks for bringing it back, mike. I've been reading all the posts very
closely.

Anyway, as an update, no delayed effects yet, thankfully. Though I'm
not willing to repeat the "experiment" anytime soon: Seems like I have
a shorted rectifier in the alternator. (Does this mean that I'm getting
voltage spikes all the time?) I'm wondering if the battery is now
"absorbing" the spikes, so it seems to boil down again to whether the
battery is acting as a large capacitor..

Thanks again to everyone.