<Honda guy> wrote in message
news:cafcf352dal4hjs8nbiusad09lge8k6ok5@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:36:41 -0700, lazyquest@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>On Sep 22, 2:24 pm, Gordon McGrew <RgEmMcOgVr...@mindspring.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>> > But in any event, whether a troll or
>>> >not, he does provide some objective assessment
>>>
>>> Well, that would be the issue, wouldn't it? It is hard to judge the
>>> objectivity of someone we don't know and who has no public history.
>>> Still, he apparently did at least a little homework on the car
>>> assuming the factual information he mentions is correct. I wouldn't
>>> discount everything he says, but I wouldn't weight it very heavily
>>> either.
>>>
>>> >....even though you apparently
>>> >don't like what he had to say....
>>>
>>> I am not fond of trolls or troll-like behavior. And, as the other
>>> poster stated, this smells like a troll.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I just wanted to express my disappointment on the new 2008 Accord
>>LX.
>>
>>I still drive my '94 Accord LX to work everyday. And on occasion, we
>>take out the 2006 Accord LX. We just donated '89 Accord LX to a local
>>charity, mainly because it was getting difficult to find key parts for
>>it - otherwise it was in a good shape to this day. They were all
>>purchased new.
>>
>
>
> First I won't call you a troll just because you are bashing the new
> Accord. While some of your review seems subjective, the rest sounds
> more factual. I can appreciate your review after reading 3 other
> professional reviews. I recall the other reviews said that the trunk
> was supposed to be the same size but as you pointed out, that doesn't
> mean it's just as practical or useable and the cabin is supposedly 3
> cu. ft. larger in volume over the previous model. I also previously
> read that the dashboard controls seemed cluttered in agreement with
> you tho I don't know if this is true without the navigation
> tool/option.

I looked at the LX - P which is a bargain. You can get it with a 5 speed
auto or the manual. This LX has 4 wheel disc brakes and alloys and power
driver seat with alloys. The base I4 now has 177 hp which is more than
enough. The dash looked simple enough. and the car is very roomy. The
tests I have read and a video confirm it handling -- a Honda hallmark. Of
course, I have no reason to get rid of my 0-6 I4 EX coupe.

 

<Honda guy> wrote in message
news:cafcf352dal4hjs8nbiusad09lge8k6ok5@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:36:41 -0700, lazyquest@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>On Sep 22, 2:24 pm, Gordon McGrew <RgEmMcOgVr...@mindspring.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>> > But in any event, whether a troll or
>>> >not, he does provide some objective assessment
>>>
>>> Well, that would be the issue, wouldn't it? It is hard to judge the
>>> objectivity of someone we don't know and who has no public history.
>>> Still, he apparently did at least a little homework on the car
>>> assuming the factual information he mentions is correct. I wouldn't
>>> discount everything he says, but I wouldn't weight it very heavily
>>> either.
>>>
>>> >....even though you apparently
>>> >don't like what he had to say....
>>>
>>> I am not fond of trolls or troll-like behavior. And, as the other
>>> poster stated, this smells like a troll.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I just wanted to express my disappointment on the new 2008 Accord
>>LX.
>>
>>I still drive my '94 Accord LX to work everyday. And on occasion, we
>>take out the 2006 Accord LX. We just donated '89 Accord LX to a local
>>charity, mainly because it was getting difficult to find key parts for
>>it - otherwise it was in a good shape to this day. They were all
>>purchased new.
>>
>
>
> First I won't call you a troll just because you are bashing the new
> Accord. While some of your review seems subjective, the rest sounds
> more factual. I can appreciate your review after reading 3 other
> professional reviews. I recall the other reviews said that the trunk
> was supposed to be the same size but as you pointed out, that doesn't
> mean it's just as practical or useable and the cabin is supposedly 3
> cu. ft. larger in volume over the previous model. I also previously
> read that the dashboard controls seemed cluttered in agreement with
> you tho I don't know if this is true without the navigation
> tool/option.

I looked at the LX - P which is a bargain. You can get it with a 5 speed
auto or the manual. This LX has 4 wheel disc brakes and alloys and power
driver seat with alloys. The base I4 now has 177 hp which is more than
enough. The dash looked simple enough. and the car is very roomy. The
tests I have read and a video confirm it handling -- a Honda hallmark. Of
course, I have no reason to get rid of my 0-6 I4 EX coupe.

 

On Sep 22, 5:06 am, lazyqu...@gmail.com wrote:
> We've owned several LX Accords through out the years and the 2008
> model, is by far, the worst of the bunch.
>
> SNIP<

You forgot to mention that it's also pretty ugly. Not that Accords
were ever beautiful (like an Audi) but dang, the new one is pretty
bizarre. Very Saturn L-Series-like. Hopefully it will look better in
the flesh, like the new Subaru Impreza. That car also looks very bad
in pictures, much nicer in person....

I have to bring my Ody in for an oil change next week, hopefully the
dealer with have the new Accord so I can see for myself.

Dan D
'07 Ody EX
Central NJ USA

 

On Sep 22, 5:06 am, lazyqu...@gmail.com wrote:
> We've owned several LX Accords through out the years and the 2008
> model, is by far, the worst of the bunch.
>
> SNIP<

You forgot to mention that it's also pretty ugly. Not that Accords
were ever beautiful (like an Audi) but dang, the new one is pretty
bizarre. Very Saturn L-Series-like. Hopefully it will look better in
the flesh, like the new Subaru Impreza. That car also looks very bad
in pictures, much nicer in person....

I have to bring my Ody in for an oil change next week, hopefully the
dealer with have the new Accord so I can see for myself.

Dan D
'07 Ody EX
Central NJ USA

 

On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:06:27 -0700, lazyquest@gmail.com wrote:

>We've owned several LX Accords through out the years and the 2008
>model, is by far, the worst of the bunch.

3400 pounds, that's what jumps out at me.


>The elegant and simple-to-use interior of the previous model has been
>replaced with cluttered and confusing array of buttons.

For the last five (ten? twenty?) years it seems like all the Japanese
manufacturers used the same generic designs - and clutter. My 04 and
07 Accords are OK, nothing more, and look an awful lot like Toyotas
and Mazdas and I'm not sure how many others.


>In summary, to those who know the "OLD HONDA", the 2008 Accord LX will
>probably appear to be a giant step backward. Compared to the several
>older LX Accord models that I've owned, 2008 Accord LX was a real
>disappointment to me.

I really don't want a larger car, the 07 is larger than I like.

I expect to look for the TSX, or maybe a Civic, next time around. Or,
y'know, a non-Honda product.

J.

 

On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:06:27 -0700, lazyquest@gmail.com wrote:

>We've owned several LX Accords through out the years and the 2008
>model, is by far, the worst of the bunch.

3400 pounds, that's what jumps out at me.


>The elegant and simple-to-use interior of the previous model has been
>replaced with cluttered and confusing array of buttons.

For the last five (ten? twenty?) years it seems like all the Japanese
manufacturers used the same generic designs - and clutter. My 04 and
07 Accords are OK, nothing more, and look an awful lot like Toyotas
and Mazdas and I'm not sure how many others.


>In summary, to those who know the "OLD HONDA", the 2008 Accord LX will
>probably appear to be a giant step backward. Compared to the several
>older LX Accord models that I've owned, 2008 Accord LX was a real
>disappointment to me.

I really don't want a larger car, the 07 is larger than I like.

I expect to look for the TSX, or maybe a Civic, next time around. Or,
y'know, a non-Honda product.

J.

 

is it true that the new navi isnt touch screen?
"JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
news:90ljf3t73487mp8onn1fqsmqkvug31i9mg@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:06:27 -0700, lazyquest@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>We've owned several LX Accords through out the years and the 2008
>>model, is by far, the worst of the bunch.
>
> 3400 pounds, that's what jumps out at me.
>
>
>>The elegant and simple-to-use interior of the previous model has been
>>replaced with cluttered and confusing array of buttons.
>
> For the last five (ten? twenty?) years it seems like all the Japanese
> manufacturers used the same generic designs - and clutter. My 04 and
> 07 Accords are OK, nothing more, and look an awful lot like Toyotas
> and Mazdas and I'm not sure how many others.
>
>
>>In summary, to those who know the "OLD HONDA", the 2008 Accord LX will
>>probably appear to be a giant step backward. Compared to the several
>>older LX Accord models that I've owned, 2008 Accord LX was a real
>>disappointment to me.
>
> I really don't want a larger car, the 07 is larger than I like.
>
> I expect to look for the TSX, or maybe a Civic, next time around. Or,
> y'know, a non-Honda product.
>
> J.
>

 

is it true that the new navi isnt touch screen?
"JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
news:90ljf3t73487mp8onn1fqsmqkvug31i9mg@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:06:27 -0700, lazyquest@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>We've owned several LX Accords through out the years and the 2008
>>model, is by far, the worst of the bunch.
>
> 3400 pounds, that's what jumps out at me.
>
>
>>The elegant and simple-to-use interior of the previous model has been
>>replaced with cluttered and confusing array of buttons.
>
> For the last five (ten? twenty?) years it seems like all the Japanese
> manufacturers used the same generic designs - and clutter. My 04 and
> 07 Accords are OK, nothing more, and look an awful lot like Toyotas
> and Mazdas and I'm not sure how many others.
>
>
>>In summary, to those who know the "OLD HONDA", the 2008 Accord LX will
>>probably appear to be a giant step backward. Compared to the several
>>older LX Accord models that I've owned, 2008 Accord LX was a real
>>disappointment to me.
>
> I really don't want a larger car, the 07 is larger than I like.
>
> I expect to look for the TSX, or maybe a Civic, next time around. Or,
> y'know, a non-Honda product.
>
> J.
>

 

Did you buy it? Or is this from a "Test drive" ?


G-Man

 

Did you buy it? Or is this from a "Test drive" ?


G-Man

 

No.Salesman told me that yesterday.
"G-Man" <g_foreman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:13fkh2alkhuvc50@news.supernews.com...
> Did you buy it? Or is this from a "Test drive" ?
>
>
> G-Man
>

 

No.Salesman told me that yesterday.
"G-Man" <g_foreman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:13fkh2alkhuvc50@news.supernews.com...
> Did you buy it? Or is this from a "Test drive" ?
>
>
> G-Man
>

 

JXStern <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in
news:90ljf3t73487mp8onn1fqsmqkvug31i9mg@4ax.com:

> On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:06:27 -0700, lazyquest@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>We've owned several LX Accords through out the years and the 2008
>>model, is by far, the worst of the bunch.
>
> 3400 pounds, that's what jumps out at me.

Every automaker keeps making their autos bigger and heavier with each new
model. They never learn.
I can recall when the Accord was the size of today's Civics.

> I expect to look for the TSX, or maybe a Civic, next time around. Or,
> y'know, a non-Honda product.
>
> J.
>
>

Neither Honda or Acura currently make anything that interests me.
They need to bring back the Prelude and Integra.Maybe the CRX,too.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

 

JXStern <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in
news:90ljf3t73487mp8onn1fqsmqkvug31i9mg@4ax.com:

> On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:06:27 -0700, lazyquest@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>We've owned several LX Accords through out the years and the 2008
>>model, is by far, the worst of the bunch.
>
> 3400 pounds, that's what jumps out at me.

Every automaker keeps making their autos bigger and heavier with each new
model. They never learn.
I can recall when the Accord was the size of today's Civics.

> I expect to look for the TSX, or maybe a Civic, next time around. Or,
> y'know, a non-Honda product.
>
> J.
>
>

Neither Honda or Acura currently make anything that interests me.
They need to bring back the Prelude and Integra.Maybe the CRX,too.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

 

"Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message
news:Xns99B768393ABCFjyanikkuanet@64.209.0.86...
>>
>>>We've owned several LX Accords through out the years and the 2008
>>>model, is by far, the worst of the bunch.
>>
>> 3400 pounds, that's what jumps out at me.
>
> Every automaker keeps making their autos bigger and heavier with each new
> model. They never learn.
> I can recall when the Accord was the size of today's Civics.

Agreed. Although gas mileage is much better, the cars are also getting
bloated. Personally I really liked the design/style of some of the older
Accords vs. the newer ones. If they want performance and gas mileage, just
think what they can do if the cars were smaller, lighter and more nimble.

>> I expect to look for the TSX, or maybe a Civic, next time around. Or,
>> y'know, a non-Honda product.
>>
>> J.
>>
>>
>
> Neither Honda or Acura currently make anything that interests me.
> They need to bring back the Prelude and Integra.Maybe the CRX,too.

I miss the Prelude (used to have an '89) and Integra too. More style and
character.

-Dave

> --
> Jim Yanik
> jyanik
> at
> kua.net