2007 CRV
09-11-2006 | 03:31 PM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
2007 CRV
I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
09-11-2006 | 06:08 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 CRV
>I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks
>more polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same engine. That engine while good for reliability still
>requires the expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a
>fairly high rpm. The performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under powered when compared to the others in
>its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
The 2.2L diesel that they use in the UK would be a smash hit
here in the good old USA. 260 ftlbs of torque would really
make the CRV jump off the line. Plus getting 30% better milage.
Lynn
>more polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same engine. That engine while good for reliability still
>requires the expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a
>fairly high rpm. The performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under powered when compared to the others in
>its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
The 2.2L diesel that they use in the UK would be a smash hit
here in the good old USA. 260 ftlbs of torque would really
make the CRV jump off the line. Plus getting 30% better milage.
Lynn
09-11-2006 | 06:08 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 CRV
>I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks
>more polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same engine. That engine while good for reliability still
>requires the expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a
>fairly high rpm. The performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under powered when compared to the others in
>its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
The 2.2L diesel that they use in the UK would be a smash hit
here in the good old USA. 260 ftlbs of torque would really
make the CRV jump off the line. Plus getting 30% better milage.
Lynn
>more polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same engine. That engine while good for reliability still
>requires the expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a
>fairly high rpm. The performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under powered when compared to the others in
>its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
The 2.2L diesel that they use in the UK would be a smash hit
here in the good old USA. 260 ftlbs of torque would really
make the CRV jump off the line. Plus getting 30% better milage.
Lynn
09-11-2006 | 06:08 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 CRV
>I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks
>more polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same engine. That engine while good for reliability still
>requires the expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a
>fairly high rpm. The performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under powered when compared to the others in
>its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
The 2.2L diesel that they use in the UK would be a smash hit
here in the good old USA. 260 ftlbs of torque would really
make the CRV jump off the line. Plus getting 30% better milage.
Lynn
>more polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same engine. That engine while good for reliability still
>requires the expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a
>fairly high rpm. The performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under powered when compared to the others in
>its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
The 2.2L diesel that they use in the UK would be a smash hit
here in the good old USA. 260 ftlbs of torque would really
make the CRV jump off the line. Plus getting 30% better milage.
Lynn
09-11-2006 | 07:05 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 CRV
Yes Lynn. Give me a 2.2 L Diesel or even a small 2.5-2.7 L V6 or I6
engine.
"Lynn McGuire" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:12gbnja7mqnal86@corp.supernews.com...
> >I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that
> >opens upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks
> >more polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the
> >same engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires
> >the expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle
> >weight and the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high
> >rpm. The performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The
> >CRV is under powered when compared to the others in its class i.e.
> >Subaru, Toyota and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will
> >upgrade ?
>
> The 2.2L diesel that they use in the UK would be a smash hit
> here in the good old USA. 260 ftlbs of torque would really
> make the CRV jump off the line. Plus getting 30% better milage.
>
> Lynn
>
>
engine.
"Lynn McGuire" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:12gbnja7mqnal86@corp.supernews.com...
> >I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that
> >opens upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks
> >more polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the
> >same engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires
> >the expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle
> >weight and the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high
> >rpm. The performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The
> >CRV is under powered when compared to the others in its class i.e.
> >Subaru, Toyota and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will
> >upgrade ?
>
> The 2.2L diesel that they use in the UK would be a smash hit
> here in the good old USA. 260 ftlbs of torque would really
> make the CRV jump off the line. Plus getting 30% better milage.
>
> Lynn
>
>
09-11-2006 | 07:05 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 CRV
Yes Lynn. Give me a 2.2 L Diesel or even a small 2.5-2.7 L V6 or I6
engine.
"Lynn McGuire" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:12gbnja7mqnal86@corp.supernews.com...
> >I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that
> >opens upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks
> >more polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the
> >same engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires
> >the expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle
> >weight and the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high
> >rpm. The performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The
> >CRV is under powered when compared to the others in its class i.e.
> >Subaru, Toyota and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will
> >upgrade ?
>
> The 2.2L diesel that they use in the UK would be a smash hit
> here in the good old USA. 260 ftlbs of torque would really
> make the CRV jump off the line. Plus getting 30% better milage.
>
> Lynn
>
>
engine.
"Lynn McGuire" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:12gbnja7mqnal86@corp.supernews.com...
> >I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that
> >opens upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks
> >more polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the
> >same engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires
> >the expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle
> >weight and the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high
> >rpm. The performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The
> >CRV is under powered when compared to the others in its class i.e.
> >Subaru, Toyota and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will
> >upgrade ?
>
> The 2.2L diesel that they use in the UK would be a smash hit
> here in the good old USA. 260 ftlbs of torque would really
> make the CRV jump off the line. Plus getting 30% better milage.
>
> Lynn
>
>
09-11-2006 | 07:05 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 CRV
Yes Lynn. Give me a 2.2 L Diesel or even a small 2.5-2.7 L V6 or I6
engine.
"Lynn McGuire" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:12gbnja7mqnal86@corp.supernews.com...
> >I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that
> >opens upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks
> >more polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the
> >same engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires
> >the expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle
> >weight and the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high
> >rpm. The performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The
> >CRV is under powered when compared to the others in its class i.e.
> >Subaru, Toyota and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will
> >upgrade ?
>
> The 2.2L diesel that they use in the UK would be a smash hit
> here in the good old USA. 260 ftlbs of torque would really
> make the CRV jump off the line. Plus getting 30% better milage.
>
> Lynn
>
>
engine.
"Lynn McGuire" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:12gbnja7mqnal86@corp.supernews.com...
> >I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that
> >opens upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks
> >more polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the
> >same engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires
> >the expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle
> >weight and the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high
> >rpm. The performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The
> >CRV is under powered when compared to the others in its class i.e.
> >Subaru, Toyota and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will
> >upgrade ?
>
> The 2.2L diesel that they use in the UK would be a smash hit
> here in the good old USA. 260 ftlbs of torque would really
> make the CRV jump off the line. Plus getting 30% better milage.
>
> Lynn
>
>
09-11-2006 | 11:01 PM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 CRV
Edward Hayes wrote:
> I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
> upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
> polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
> engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
> expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
> the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
> performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
> powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
> and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
I'm pretty sure that engine is chain-driven.
> I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
> upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
> polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
> engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
> expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
> the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
> performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
> powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
> and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
I'm pretty sure that engine is chain-driven.
09-11-2006 | 11:01 PM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 CRV
Edward Hayes wrote:
> I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
> upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
> polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
> engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
> expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
> the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
> performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
> powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
> and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
I'm pretty sure that engine is chain-driven.
> I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
> upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
> polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
> engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
> expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
> the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
> performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
> powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
> and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
I'm pretty sure that engine is chain-driven.
09-11-2006 | 11:01 PM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 CRV
Edward Hayes wrote:
> I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
> upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
> polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
> engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
> expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
> the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
> performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
> powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
> and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
I'm pretty sure that engine is chain-driven.
> I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
> upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
> polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
> engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
> expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
> the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
> performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
> powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
> and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
I'm pretty sure that engine is chain-driven.
09-12-2006 | 10:03 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 CRV
I think you are right. I have the 2.4L in an '04 Accord, and its got a
timing chain.
"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:12y84caudc4nm$.dlg@hightech.misfit...
> Edward Hayes wrote:
>
>> I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
>> upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
>> polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
>> engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
>> expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
>> the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
>> performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
>> powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
>> and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
>
> I'm pretty sure that engine is chain-driven.
timing chain.
"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:12y84caudc4nm$.dlg@hightech.misfit...
> Edward Hayes wrote:
>
>> I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
>> upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
>> polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
>> engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
>> expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
>> the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
>> performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
>> powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
>> and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
>
> I'm pretty sure that engine is chain-driven.
09-12-2006 | 10:03 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 CRV
I think you are right. I have the 2.4L in an '04 Accord, and its got a
timing chain.
"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:12y84caudc4nm$.dlg@hightech.misfit...
> Edward Hayes wrote:
>
>> I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
>> upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
>> polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
>> engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
>> expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
>> the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
>> performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
>> powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
>> and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
>
> I'm pretty sure that engine is chain-driven.
timing chain.
"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:12y84caudc4nm$.dlg@hightech.misfit...
> Edward Hayes wrote:
>
>> I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
>> upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
>> polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
>> engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
>> expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
>> the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
>> performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
>> powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
>> and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
>
> I'm pretty sure that engine is chain-driven.
09-12-2006 | 10:03 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 CRV
I think you are right. I have the 2.4L in an '04 Accord, and its got a
timing chain.
"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:12y84caudc4nm$.dlg@hightech.misfit...
> Edward Hayes wrote:
>
>> I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
>> upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
>> polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
>> engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
>> expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
>> the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
>> performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
>> powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
>> and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
>
> I'm pretty sure that engine is chain-driven.
timing chain.
"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:12y84caudc4nm$.dlg@hightech.misfit...
> Edward Hayes wrote:
>
>> I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
>> upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
>> polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
>> engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
>> expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
>> the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
>> performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
>> powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
>> and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
>
> I'm pretty sure that engine is chain-driven.
09-18-2006 | 04:07 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 CRV
If you take the engine head cover off, you'll see that it's a chain. It
is the same engine that's been in an Accord since 2003. Even Honda
mechanics don't know that it's a chain.... Scarry.
Cheers.
High Tech Misfit wrote:
> Edward Hayes wrote:
>
> > I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
> > upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
> > polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
> > engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
> > expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
> > the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
> > performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
> > powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
> > and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
>
> I'm pretty sure that engine is chain-driven.
is the same engine that's been in an Accord since 2003. Even Honda
mechanics don't know that it's a chain.... Scarry.
Cheers.
High Tech Misfit wrote:
> Edward Hayes wrote:
>
> > I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
> > upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
> > polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
> > engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
> > expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
> > the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
> > performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
> > powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
> > and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
>
> I'm pretty sure that engine is chain-driven.
09-18-2006 | 04:07 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 CRV
If you take the engine head cover off, you'll see that it's a chain. It
is the same engine that's been in an Accord since 2003. Even Honda
mechanics don't know that it's a chain.... Scarry.
Cheers.
High Tech Misfit wrote:
> Edward Hayes wrote:
>
> > I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
> > upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
> > polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
> > engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
> > expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
> > the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
> > performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
> > powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
> > and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
>
> I'm pretty sure that engine is chain-driven.
is the same engine that's been in an Accord since 2003. Even Honda
mechanics don't know that it's a chain.... Scarry.
Cheers.
High Tech Misfit wrote:
> Edward Hayes wrote:
>
> > I was looking at the new CRV and really like the rear door that opens
> > upward rather than sideways. In general the vehicle looks more
> > polished. I was however disappointed that they have kept the same
> > engine. That engine while good for reliability still requires the
> > expensive timing belt service. With the increase in vehicle weight and
> > the 2.4L engine only managing 160 HP at a fairly high rpm. The
> > performance numbers demonstrate its mediocre power. The CRV is under
> > powered when compared to the others in its class i.e. Subaru, Toyota
> > and the new Mitsubishi. Maybe next year they will upgrade ?
>
> I'm pretty sure that engine is chain-driven.