Possible Ticket Tonight
#16
Originally Posted by JesasaurusRex
Think its fightable?
Go to court and explain how there was a semi in front of you travelling at a speed lower than the limit, you switched lanes to avoid a potential hazard by not having 100% of your vision, and right as you switched lanes, you noticed the light was yellow and you could not safely stop in time to avoid an accident. You were looking out for not only yourself, but the families out on the road whos lives you might ruin my slamming through their windshield. You were not speeding, you were travelling too fast to stop safely.
Do not admit anything except what they have you for.
By the way, next time... stop.
#17
Experienced GTcars Poster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Posts: 1,757
Rep Power: 765
Originally Posted by McGruff
Yes.
Go to court and explain how there was a semi in front of you travelling at a speed lower than the limit, you switched lanes to avoid a potential hazard by not having 100% of your vision, and right as you switched lanes, you noticed the light was yellow and you could not safely stop in time to avoid an accident. You were looking out for not only yourself, but the families out on the road whos lives you might ruin my slamming through their windshield. You were not speeding, you were travelling too fast to stop safely.
Do not admit anything except what they have you for.
By the way, next time... stop.
Go to court and explain how there was a semi in front of you travelling at a speed lower than the limit, you switched lanes to avoid a potential hazard by not having 100% of your vision, and right as you switched lanes, you noticed the light was yellow and you could not safely stop in time to avoid an accident. You were looking out for not only yourself, but the families out on the road whos lives you might ruin my slamming through their windshield. You were not speeding, you were travelling too fast to stop safely.
Do not admit anything except what they have you for.
By the way, next time... stop.
#18
Originally Posted by JesasaurusRex
Guess thatll work however they do not even have my face on camera so...
#19
Experienced GTcars Poster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Posts: 1,757
Rep Power: 765
Originally Posted by archemedes
who's the thing registered to? that's who gets the ticket (you are responsible for anyone using your vehicle)
#20
Experienced GTcars Poster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Posts: 1,757
Rep Power: 765
" Drivers Who Block Their Face Are Never Cited
A driver who obscures his face while transiting an intersection is also not subject to automated enforcement. Without a clear photograph of the driver, no citation can be issued The California Vehicle Code (CVC Section 210) requires a "clear photograph of a vehicle's license plate and the driver of the vehicle" for an automated enforcement citation to be issued.
Again, a dishonest driver can totally avoid automated enforcement by placing his hand over his face or by flipping down his visor while running a red light at an intersection with automated enforcement. Truly dangerous driver can more easily run lights under these circumstances, knowing that they are immune to enforcement. "
THANK YOU TICKET ASSASSIN.COM
A driver who obscures his face while transiting an intersection is also not subject to automated enforcement. Without a clear photograph of the driver, no citation can be issued The California Vehicle Code (CVC Section 210) requires a "clear photograph of a vehicle's license plate and the driver of the vehicle" for an automated enforcement citation to be issued.
Again, a dishonest driver can totally avoid automated enforcement by placing his hand over his face or by flipping down his visor while running a red light at an intersection with automated enforcement. Truly dangerous driver can more easily run lights under these circumstances, knowing that they are immune to enforcement. "
THANK YOU TICKET ASSASSIN.COM
#21
I'd double check that I don't know California (they do write laws to please criminals) but most places there is only one picture taken becasue of the number of cases where a driver said that's wasn't me and they can't prove it was (ever see one of those pics they suck)I have also seen ticket assassin be wrong before (they said if you send more money than the ticket is for and never cash the refund check it stays open which when states are asked about it they laugh) lawmakers are pretty intelligent and wouldn't make a rule like that when you can't take a picture through glass and have a good picture from a distance at night
#23
Experienced GTcars Poster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Posts: 1,757
Rep Power: 765
Originally Posted by 69z-28
wait... did you have that crazy helmet on with the horns? lmao, can you image in the guy who looks at the picture seein that. bein like wtf?lol
#26
oooo. ok. lol. well you said "i ducked my head down" so i figured you were talking on your bike but yea if you had a helmet then and stuff they wouldnt be looking at your face and yea nevermind.lol
#27
that brings up another good point, a motorcycle would be exempt from a ticket if what was said about not a picture of the face is true (can't get a good pic through a helmet, and I know helmets are optional in CA)
#28
Experienced GTcars Poster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Posts: 1,757
Rep Power: 765
Originally Posted by archemedes
that brings up another good point, a motorcycle would be exempt from a ticket if what was said about not a picture of the face is true (can't get a good pic through a helmet, and I know helmets are optional in CA)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CryoSLASH
Traffic Tickets & Car Insurance Discussion
8
04-18-2007 08:12 AM
Fast Eddie
Special Events and Meets
1
05-18-2005 09:56 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)