Chit Chat For all general off topic chat on GTcars.

Ok so I test drove my first BMW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2006 | 05:43 PM
  #1  
Nastyzed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Skilled GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 763
Rep Power: 0
Nastyzed can only hope to improve
Ok so I test drove my first BMW

it was a 1993 320i 2 door. I always thought they looked sexy. First off if i was ever going to buy and import it would be one of these in a heartbeat. Much is left to be desired tho. When I opened the door the window had a pull on the weather strip which I didnt like. When you put the windows all the way to the top the door panel bulges out. There is hard plastic everywere much like GM interiors of the time. Build quaility in terms of gaps on outside panels is below the 1993 cadillac sts (which I looked at also). I like the gauges and the unique dials and fonts. The car rides great (could use more power) but it felt as though it was one with the road. Id also like to know whats up with the two holes punched into the side skirts. Overall this car was very nice for 240,000kms

If I was to buy an import it would be in the german market.
Old 06-23-2006 | 07:45 PM
  #2  
rabbitman's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,367
From: Kitchener
Rep Power: 802
rabbitman is a jewel in the roughrabbitman is a jewel in the roughrabbitman is a jewel in the roughrabbitman is a jewel in the rough
The holes in the side skirts is likely the jack positions. My wife's Jetta has something similar.
Old 06-24-2006 | 02:04 PM
  #3  
Low-Low's Avatar
Average GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 601
From: Etobicoke
Rep Power: 732
Low-Low street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by rabbitman
The holes in the side skirts is likely the jack positions. My wife's Jetta has something similar.
you're correct. :thumbsup:

However holes in the bumper (mercedes) are supposedly backing up alert sensors.
Old 07-10-2006 | 03:13 PM
  #4  
Eugene's Avatar
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 720
Eugene street rep is low. keep going
Yeah...Bmw's are crap. You should stick with IROC's Tony.
Old 07-11-2006 | 09:24 PM
  #5  
Supra_RZ's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,516
From: Toronto East
Rep Power: 0
Supra_RZ is a name known to allSupra_RZ is a name known to allSupra_RZ is a name known to allSupra_RZ is a name known to allSupra_RZ is a name known to allSupra_RZ is a name known to all
if your gonna buy a E36 BMW go for the 1996-1999 328i, 328is, 318i, 318is, 325, or M3 . thoes are pretty good.
Old 10-02-2006 | 02:19 AM
  #6  
94cdnm3's Avatar
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2
From: Vancouver, BC
Rep Power: 0
94cdnm3 street rep is low. keep going
IROC over an M3??!!

As a former owner of:

1978, 1979 & 1980 Z-28 and 1987, 1988 IROC Z (All 5.7L engines with bolt on mods and suspension upgrades, there is no comparison to the 1994 BMW Eurospec M3 I own now.

Firstly, the M3's structural integrity is vastly superior which translates to outstanding handling (Voted by Car & Driver in 1997 as best handling car beating out the C5 Corvette, Ferrari F355, Acura NSX, Porsche 911 etc.

Secondly, the brakes are much much bigger and are not far off from the best of today's cars. (60-0 mph in ~116 ft)

Finally, with 286hp stock and a curb weight of only 3200lbs she plenty fast too. According to a German Auto mag, 0-60 is accomplished in ~5.5secs and top speed of 163 mph.

So in response to getting an IROC Z instead of a BMW M3 (even a North American spec car with 240 hp) there is no way a true driving enthusiast would choose the IROC over the M3 based on overall performance.

May I suggest you test drive an E36 M3 and see for yourself.
Old 10-03-2006 | 11:40 PM
  #7  
Young gun's Avatar
Skilled GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 741
Rep Power: 0
Young gun can only hope to improve
^ that is stating the obvious, M3 is in a seperate class

but he test drove the 320 which i must say is like below base model lol
Just because it wears the BMW badge doesnt make it a diamond its like comparing a base cavalier with a corvette.
Old 10-04-2006 | 12:31 PM
  #8  
gtown69's Avatar
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 98
From: toronto
Rep Power: 0
gtown69 can only hope to improve
i had a 328, it was amazing. it smoked type-r's, mustangs, and vr6's like a joke. it was also reliable and affordable.
Old 10-08-2006 | 05:41 PM
  #9  
5PointOHNO's Avatar
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 177
Rep Power: 706
5PointOHNO will become famous soon enough5PointOHNO will become famous soon enough
^BWAHAHA

They're junk... glad I didn't buy a 3 Series.
Old 10-08-2006 | 07:16 PM
  #10  
Supra_RZ's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,516
From: Toronto East
Rep Power: 0
Supra_RZ is a name known to allSupra_RZ is a name known to allSupra_RZ is a name known to allSupra_RZ is a name known to allSupra_RZ is a name known to allSupra_RZ is a name known to all
try driving a new M3, M5 or M6....when i drove thoes it was like nothing else...they just pull like crazy
Old 10-08-2006 | 07:42 PM
  #11  
5PointOHNO's Avatar
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 177
Rep Power: 706
5PointOHNO will become famous soon enough5PointOHNO will become famous soon enough
For the money they charge the 1996 I was looking at should have been perfectly fine.

It wasn't though. Niether was the 95 or the 94. I'm sure the new ones are nice though, but then again, they better be.
Old 10-12-2006 | 07:53 PM
  #12  
Nastyzed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Skilled GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 763
Rep Power: 0
Nastyzed can only hope to improve
Originally Posted by 94cdnm3
As a former owner of:

1978, 1979 & 1980 Z-28 and 1987, 1988 IROC Z (All 5.7L engines with bolt on mods and suspension upgrades, there is no comparison to the 1994 BMW Eurospec M3 I own now.

Firstly, the M3's structural integrity is vastly superior which translates to outstanding handling (Voted by Car & Driver in 1997 as best handling car beating out the C5 Corvette, Ferrari F355, Acura NSX, Porsche 911 etc.

Secondly, the brakes are much much bigger and are not far off from the best of today's cars. (60-0 mph in ~116 ft)

Finally, with 286hp stock and a curb weight of only 3200lbs she plenty fast too. According to a German Auto mag, 0-60 is accomplished in ~5.5secs and top speed of 163 mph.

So in response to getting an IROC Z instead of a BMW M3 (even a North American spec car with 240 hp) there is no way a true driving enthusiast would choose the IROC over the M3 based on overall performance.

May I suggest you test drive an E36 M3 and see for yourself.
Too damn heavy , not that f-body isint. Ive read about SBC swaps in beemers and they are slower then the f-bodys cause the weight. Not to mention camaros are better looking.
Old 10-13-2006 | 12:05 PM
  #13  
munch's Avatar
Experienced GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,087
From: cruizin on a street near you
Rep Power: 762
munch street rep is low. keep going
if you cant afford 5 series and up bmw aint worth lookin at
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Alan
Hyundai Mailing List
5
06-23-2009 09:48 PM
mpe331lx
chevy / gmc
5
06-03-2007 03:39 AM
angry youngman
Honda Civic - Del Sol - CRX
1
06-01-2007 12:56 PM
aarontracy
chevy / gmc
5
10-22-2006 10:11 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Ok so I test drove my first BMW



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:33 PM.

Page generated in 0.11069 seconds with 6 queries