Chit Chat For all general off topic chat on GTcars.

Canada in potential impact zone of next falling satellite

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2011 | 07:05 PM
  #1  
GTCz-Roger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Average GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 571
From: Burnsville
Rep Power: 497
GTCz-Roger will become famous soon enoughGTCz-Roger will become famous soon enough
Canada in potential impact zone of next falling satellite

For the second time in about a month, earthlings have reason to fear a falling satellite.

This time it's an old German space telescope that will plunge to Earth in the coming weeks -- and Canada falls within the potential impact zone.

There are many reasons to hope ROSAT steers clear of this country -- 785 of them, to be exact. That's the weight in kilograms of the satellite's mirrors, equivalent to a standard-sized polar bear.

The chances of someone actually getting hit by debris from the uncontrolled satellite are hardly any different from those predicted before last month's fiery return of another satellite, which came down over the Pacific Ocean and caused no damage to humans.

NASA had calculated a 3,200-to-1 chance of that satellite causing injuries back on Earth; for the ROentgen SATellite, it's calculated at 2,000 to 1.

The German Aerospace Center (DLR) advises on its website that the large X-ray observatory, the size of a mobile home, is due to re-enter the atmosphere around the end of October.

Read more: http://ottawa.ctv.ca/servlet/an/loca...hub=OttawaHome
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GTCz-Roger
Chit Chat
0
10-20-2011 07:57 AM
jenneylist
Honda Mailing List
0
06-07-2009 04:56 AM
2TONE_93GT
Chit Chat
1
02-20-2008 11:13 PM
bLkWdOw SS
chevy / gmc
15
09-22-2005 10:36 PM
delhelt
Hyundai Mailing List
0
10-16-2004 06:35 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Canada in potential impact zone of next falling satellite



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 AM.

Page generated in 0.07306 seconds with 6 queries