chevy / gmc corvette, cobalt, chevelle, cavalier, camaro, beretta, blazer, avalanche/silverado/suburban/tahoe, safari, jimmy, sierra , yukon

Pacesetter LT's VS Mac MT's.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-21-2005 | 01:42 AM
  #1  
RFF's Avatar
RFF
Thread Starter
~~~ SITE SPONSOR ~~~
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,073
Rep Power: 902
RFF street rep is low. keep going
Question Pacesetter LT's VS Mac MT's.

Yeah I know I'm being cheap but I'm not dropping 1K plus just for some Kooks type headers. I decided to go between these two headers for several reasons, one of course being price and the other being ground clearance. The Pacesetter sit a little lower then the Macs but I have heard they are more forgiving when it comes to ground clearance when compared to Hooker Headers. Shortys are out of the question because the gains are so small, the Macs don't offer the performance of LT's but they come very close. Price wise the Pacestters cost an extra 150+ with the Y-Pipe. Which header would you go with?
Old 04-21-2005 | 01:45 AM
  #2  
NoRiceInside's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,173
From: Valencia, CA
Rep Power: 910
NoRiceInside street rep is low. keep going
well i dont think the mac LTs come with a y-pipe...so since the pacesetters have it with the LTs...go for pacesetters.

by the way, do the pacesetter LTs have emissions hook ups and does the y-pipe work with the stock cat?
Old 04-21-2005 | 01:50 AM
  #3  
NoRiceInside's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,173
From: Valencia, CA
Rep Power: 910
NoRiceInside street rep is low. keep going
actually i dont think any LTs have y-pipes...these dont have one but they do have egr and air hookups...yay for cali peeps:



http://store.summitracing.com/partde...1&autoview=sku

god **** those are gorgeous...i need my LT1 now!!!!!!!!!

but yeah heres the pacesetter y-pipe...looks like the cat wont be able to fit in with this thing on:



http://store.summitracing.com/partde...4&autoview=sku
Old 04-21-2005 | 01:57 AM
  #4  
RFF's Avatar
RFF
Thread Starter
~~~ SITE SPONSOR ~~~
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,073
Rep Power: 902
RFF street rep is low. keep going
Why would LT's have no Y pipe? Oh and BTW I wouldn't buy those headers from summit, way over priced.
Old 04-21-2005 | 01:59 AM
  #5  
RFF's Avatar
RFF
Thread Starter
~~~ SITE SPONSOR ~~~
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,073
Rep Power: 902
RFF street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by NoRiceInside
well i dont think the mac LTs come with a y-pipe
The Macs come with a Y-Pipe.

Old 04-21-2005 | 02:42 AM
  #6  
NoRiceInside's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,173
From: Valencia, CA
Rep Power: 910
NoRiceInside street rep is low. keep going
yeah i saw those but those arent LTs...theyre shorties
Old 04-21-2005 | 02:47 AM
  #7  
RFF's Avatar
RFF
Thread Starter
~~~ SITE SPONSOR ~~~
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,073
Rep Power: 902
RFF street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by NoRiceInside
yeah i saw those but those arent LTs...theyre shorties
Their actually called mid length headers, MAC doesn't make a shorty for the LT1's.
Old 04-21-2005 | 04:55 PM
  #8  
archemedes's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,868
From: Saraland AL
Rep Power: 1069
archemedes street rep is low. keep going
I'd say do the mid length since the gain is similar and a lower price (long tubes hurt the power band anyway that's why you don't see a graph with them just peak power)
Old 04-21-2005 | 05:56 PM
  #9  
RFF's Avatar
RFF
Thread Starter
~~~ SITE SPONSOR ~~~
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,073
Rep Power: 902
RFF street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by archemedes
I'd say do the mid length since the gain is similar and a lower price (long tubes hurt the power band anyway that's why you don't see a graph with them just peak power)
Very interesting point Arch, I remember people on other boards always saying that the LT's give you more power up top when the ST and MT's fall on their face. I'm taking it that LT's basically shift the power band to the upper RPM range correct?
Old 04-21-2005 | 06:08 PM
  #10  
SLPowerZ's Avatar
GTcars Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,313
From: Mentor on the Lake, OH
Rep Power: 747
SLPowerZ street rep is low. keep going
i like lts personally but i've heard alot of good stuff about mid lengths toos
Old 04-21-2005 | 06:19 PM
  #11  
RFF's Avatar
RFF
Thread Starter
~~~ SITE SPONSOR ~~~
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,073
Rep Power: 902
RFF street rep is low. keep going
Once you tack in shipping (macs cost a lot to ship for some reason) the Pacesetters cost about $100, however I'm not getting good feed back on the pacesetters for ground clearance it seems they might be just as bad as the hookers.
Old 04-21-2005 | 06:29 PM
  #12  
RFF's Avatar
RFF
Thread Starter
~~~ SITE SPONSOR ~~~
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,073
Rep Power: 902
RFF street rep is low. keep going
Ok the pacesetter come cermanic coated while the Macs come HTS coated, what is the difference?
Old 04-21-2005 | 06:51 PM
  #13  
archemedes's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,868
From: Saraland AL
Rep Power: 1069
archemedes street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by Rockford Fosgate Fan
Very interesting point Arch, I remember people on other boards always saying that the LT's give you more power up top when the ST and MT's fall on their face. I'm taking it that LT's basically shift the power band to the upper RPM range correct?
that's what I've always been told, not sure the difference in coatings
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
honda video
Honda Videos
0
02-22-2008 01:24 AM
SleekZ
Car Parts For Sale
2
02-10-2008 04:49 PM
SOMBirdV6
Car Parts For Sale
10
01-03-2008 09:17 AM
fgerle
chevy / gmc
9
10-11-2005 01:23 AM
Dr Jdm
Car Parts For Sale
0
04-20-2005 09:06 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Pacesetter LT's VS Mac MT's.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:35 PM.

Page generated in 0.07894 seconds with 6 queries