Vid: 13.1 N/A DC5
04-25-2005 | 01:44 PM
#1
Thread Starter
GTcars Regular
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,059
Rep Power: 742 
Vid: 13.1 N/A DC5
This same kid hit 12.8's .9's. Wish i could find that vid 
Other than the slicks, all else is street trim...
...http://bsr.njsr.org/2004/061204/2.wmv
Other than the slicks, all else is street trim...
...http://bsr.njsr.org/2004/061204/2.wmv
04-25-2005 | 02:48 PM
#3
Originally Posted by lethal429
Wow, that yellow neon does work pretty good 
....nice (((("""""""""" N/A """""""""")))) DC5 ....
......your right i also seen him doing 12.9, i'll try to find it
Last edited by fastestcivic; 04-25-2005 at 02:52 PM.
04-25-2005 | 03:32 PM
#4
Thread Starter
GTcars Regular
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,059
Rep Power: 742
Originally Posted by lethal429
Wow, that yellow neon does work pretty good
a N/A 4 banger right next to it running 0.1sec less. well, he did have slicks, but still
04-25-2005 | 03:33 PM
#5
Originally Posted by ricernoob
kind of sad, though, if u think about it.
a N/A 4 banger right next to it running 0.1sec less. well, he did have slicks, but still
a N/A 4 banger right next to it running 0.1sec less. well, he did have slicks, but still
04-25-2005 | 04:25 PM
#8
Average GTcars Poster
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 480
From: Scarborough
Rep Power: 730
Originally Posted by ricernoob
kind of sad, though, if u think about it.
a N/A 4 banger right next to it running 0.1sec less. well, he did have slicks, but still
a N/A 4 banger right next to it running 0.1sec less. well, he did have slicks, but still
04-25-2005 | 05:35 PM
#9
Thread Starter
GTcars Regular
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,059
Rep Power: 742
Originally Posted by skillton
They were both built for different applications. The RSX has a high revving low torque naturally aspirated 4cyl, the neon has a low revving high torque 4cyl turbo. The turbo car is obviously making more power. It's trapping 4-5mph higher in a heavier body.
haha, just messing with u bro! But thanks for pointing out the obvious
....and both cars had mods to so i still give the bigger ups 
to the NA...
04-25-2005 | 11:19 PM
#14
Average GTcars Poster
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 480
From: Scarborough
Rep Power: 730
Originally Posted by jdmsleeper
N/A is the way to go, more reliable, and more consistent. Turbos have their bad days lol. That was a nice run by both of them :thumbsup
04-25-2005 | 11:49 PM
#15
Experienced GTcars Poster
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,518
From: Mississauga
Rep Power: 751
Originally Posted by jdmsleeper
N/A is the way to go, more reliable, and more consistent. Turbos have their bad days lol. That was a nice run by both of them :thumbsup
Yeah ing right... you're saying a 250hp naturally aspirated engine is more reliable then a 250hp turbocharged engine of the same displacement? I'm going to have to go ahead here and disagree with you...