Better pics of WW-wing (56K no way)
#1
Better pics of WW-wing (56K no way)
Winter is coming and i wont be using the car much more... IŽl let the wing be on the car until spring arrives.
#2
The main reason I don't like the wing is that it's to high. The stock Trans Am spoiler fits the hood perfectly. If you had teh VFN 4" hood then that spoiler would look a little better but as is I personally don't think it flow's really well.
But it's your car so do what you like best.
But it's your car so do what you like best.
#4
Agreed. My only difference would be that I don't think it would look good even with the VFN 4". The rest of the car looks killer. I might steal the idea of the clear side markers and red L.E.D.
#5
I don't mind it, and I'm pretty stingy about what people do to F-Bodies...
I do, however, mind that your car is filthy! Wash that thing!
I do, however, mind that your car is filthy! Wash that thing!
#6
Originally Posted by TorqueDog
I don't mind it, and I'm pretty stingy about what people do to F-Bodies...
I do, however, mind that your car is filthy! Wash that thing!
I do, however, mind that your car is filthy! Wash that thing!
Im diggin it man... Definitly sets it off.
petrol! haha... I love that word.
#7
i think it looks really good from the front or from a front angle but when i see it from the back or the side i dont like it.
#9
sorry, but that wing needs a honda logo and type r stickers, anyone that likes it can not say anything about a ricer
#10
Originally Posted by archemedes
sorry, but that wing needs a honda logo and type r stickers, anyone that likes it can not say anything about a ricer
For the record, there are cars on this site (active users, I will not mention any names) that I would classify as ricer-esque, tasteless, or just plain tacky, before this car would ever receive that branding from me.
#11
Originally Posted by TorqueDog
Actually yes, we can. Last time I checked, you aren't an authority on "What is a ricer and what is not".
For the record, there are cars on this site (active users, I will not mention any names) that I would classify as ricer-esque, tasteless, or just plain tacky, before this car would ever receive that branding from me.
For the record, there are cars on this site (active users, I will not mention any names) that I would classify as ricer-esque, tasteless, or just plain tacky, before this car would ever receive that branding from me.
#13
#15
Wing just looks weird to me, looks kinda like a double decker type spoiler from a need for speed game.
On a side note, what does fuel cost over there? All I see is 8.14 in the pics, and I have no idea what that means.
On a side note, what does fuel cost over there? All I see is 8.14 in the pics, and I have no idea what that means.